Literature DB >> 16294121

Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations.

Dianne S Ward1, Kelly R Evenson, Amber Vaughn, Anne Brown Rodgers, Richard P Troiano.   

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly interested in the potential of accelerometers to improve our ability to measure and understand the health impacts of physical activity. Although accelerometers have been available commercially for more than 25 yr, broad consensus about how to use these tools has not been established. At a scientific conference in December 2004, a number of scientists were invited to present papers, serve as reactors or moderators to papers, present posters of original research, or serve as members of an audience knowledgeable about the use of accelerometers. During 2 1/2 d, information about best practices of accelerometer use was presented and suggestions for future research were made. From the collective experience of papers presented and discussions held, five areas of accelerometer use were described. This paper summarizes the best practices and future research needs from those five areas: monitor selection, quality, and dependability; monitor use protocols; monitor calibration; analysis of accelerometer data; and integration with other data sources. Suggestions for reporting standards for journal articles also are presented.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16294121     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185292.71933.91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  228 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Mireille N M van Poppel; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial.

Authors:  Melissa A Napolitano; Kelley E Borradaile; Beth A Lewis; Jessica A Whiteley; Jaime L Longval; Alfred F Parisi; Anna E Albrecht; Christopher N Sciamanna; John M Jakicic; George D Papandonatos; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Comparing GPS, Log, Survey, and Accelerometry to Measure Physical Activity.

Authors:  Peter James; Jennifer Weissman; Jean Wolf; Karen Mumford; Cheryl K Contant; Wei-Ting Hwang; Lynne Taylor; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2016-01

4.  Adherence to accelerometry measurement of community ambulation poststroke.

Authors:  Sharon Barak; Samuel S Wu; Yunfeng Dai; Pamela W Duncan; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-12

5.  The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking.

Authors:  C G Ryan; P M Grant; W W Tigbe; M H Granat
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Age-related change in physical activity in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Russell R Pate; June Stevens; Larry S Webber; Marsha Dowda; David M Murray; Deborah R Young; Scott Going
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Do participants with children age 18 and under have suboptimal weight loss?

Authors:  Diane L Rosenbaum; Jocelyn E Remmert; Evan M Forman; Meghan L Butryn
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2018-03-01

8.  Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Catherine R Marinac; Katherine Ellis; Suneeta Godbole; Aaron Hipp; Karen Glanz; Jonathan Mitchell; Francine Laden; Peter James; David Berrigan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Increased physical activity and reduced adiposity in overweight Hispanic adolescents.

Authors:  Courtney E Byrd-Williams; Britni R Belcher; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis; Emily E Ventura; Louise Kelly; Kiros Berhane; Stanley Azen; Michael I Goran
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Physical activity level as an outcome measure for use in cancer cachexia trials: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Matthew Maddocks; Anthony Byrne; Colin D Johnson; Richard H Wilson; Kenneth C H Fearon; Andrew Wilcock
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.