| Literature DB >> 32394015 |
Helge C Kniep1, Peter B Sporns2, Gabriel Broocks3, André Kemmling4, Jawed Nawabi3,5, Thilo Rusche2, Jens Fiehler3, Uta Hanning3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Triage of patients with basilar artery occlusion for additional imaging diagnostics, therapy planning, and initial outcome prediction requires assessment of early ischemic changes in early hyperacute non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) scans. However, accuracy of visual evaluation is impaired by inter- and intra-reader variability, artifacts in the posterior fossa and limited sensitivity for subtle density shifts. We propose a machine learning approach for detecting early ischemic changes in pc-ASPECTS regions (Posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) based on admission NCCTs.Entities:
Keywords: Basilar artery occlusion; CT imaging; Computer-assisted radiographic image interpretation; Early infarct signs; Machine learning; Stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32394015 PMCID: PMC7419359 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09859-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurol ISSN: 0340-5354 Impact factor: 4.849
Fig. 1Conceptual overview of the proposed machine learning approach showing the major processing steps: CT-based image acquisition and segmentation, feature extraction (n = 1218), and statistical learning (random forest algorithm). NCCT non-contrast computed tomography, pc-ASPECTS Posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early CT Score, FUCT follow-up computed tomography, PCA posterior cerebral artery
Baseline characteristics of the study patients
| Patient characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Age at admission (year) [median (IQR)] | 74 (60; 80) |
| Female | 37 (52.1) |
| Baseline NIHSS [median (IQR)] | 11 (4; 17) |
| Intravenous thrombolysis [ | 42 (60.9) |
| Diabetes mellitus [ | 22 (31.9) |
| Hypercholesterolemia [ | 18 (26.1) |
| Arterial hypertension [ | 50 (72.5) |
| Arterial fibrillation [ | 30 (43.5) |
| Smoking [ | 8 (11.6) |
| Etiology atherosclerosis [ | 32 (46.6) |
| Etiology cardioembolism [ | 7 (10.1) |
| Etiology other [ | 1 (1.4) |
| Etiology unknown [ | 29 (42) |
NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, FUCT follow-up non-contrast computed tomography, pc-ASPECTS Posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, FU follow-up, PCA posterior cerebral artery
Fig. 2Receiver operating characteristic curves and neuroradiologist readings operating points for detecting early ischemic changes in pc-ASPECTS regions based on acute NCCT scans. Left graphs: machine learning classifier receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with optimal operating point at maximum MCC (sensitivity; specificity), grey rectangles define cut-out areas shown in graphs on the right; right graphs: cut-outs of left figures showing neuroradiologist reader rating results (sensitivity; specificity). Blue lines depict ROC curves, grey areas shows 95% confidence intervals (CI). Red crosses show cut-off points/prediction performance. AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval, ROC receiver operating characteristics, NCCT non-contrast computed tomography, pc-ASPECTS Posterior circulation Acute Stroke Prognosis Early CT Score, MCC Matthews correlation coefficient, PCA posterior cerebral artery
Per-region classification performance for detection of early ischemic changes
| Region | Prediction | Cut-off point | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | Accuracy (%) | Youden index | MCC (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thalamus | Reader 1 + 2 | – | 24% (12%; 36%) | 91% (87%; 94%) | 79 | 0.15 | 0.17 (0.00; 0.32) |
| Classifier | Specificity R1 + R2 | 39% (33%; 45%) | 91% (89%; 92%) | 80 | 0.30 | 0.33* (0.17; 0.47) | |
| Classifier | Maximum MCC | 82% (78%; 87%) | 71% (68%; 73%) | 73 | 0.53 | 0.44** (0.29; 0.57) | |
| Midbrain | Reader 1 + 2 | – | 19% (7%; 31%) | 82% (75%; 90%) | 63 | 0.01 | 0.02 (− 0.22; 0.25) |
| Classifier | Specificity R1 + R2 | 48% (41%; 54%) | 82% (78%; 85%) | 71 | 0.29 | 0.30* (0.07; 0.50) | |
| Classifier | Maximum MCC | 66% (60%; 73%) | 75% (71%; 78%) | 72 | 0.41 | 0.39** (0.17; 0.57) | |
| PCA | Reader 1 + 2 | – | 33% (22%; 45%) | 88% (84%; 92%) | 75 | 0.21 | 0.24 (0.08; 0.39) |
| Classifier | Specificity R1 + R2 | 47% (41%; 52%) | 88% (87%; 91%) | 79 | 0.35 | 0.38 (0.23; 0.51) | |
| Classifier | Maximum MCC | 80% (76%; 85%) | 64% (61%; 67%) | 68 | 0.44 | 0.38* (0.23; 0.51) | |
| Pons | Reader 1 + 2 | – | 8% (1%; 16%) | 91% (85%; 97%) | 62 | − 0.01 | − 0.01 (− 0.23; 0.25) |
| Classifier | Specificity R1 + R2 | 26% (21%; 32%) | 91% (87%; 92%) | 68 | 0.16 | 0.21* (0.00; 0.43) | |
| Classifier | Maximum MCC | 68% (62%; 74%) | 79% (75%; 83%) | 75 | 0.47 | 0.46** (0.25; 0.63) | |
| Cerebellum | Reader 1 + 2 | – | 39% (30%; 51%) | 89% (84%; 93%) | 74 | 0.28 | 0.32 (0.16; 0.46) |
| Classifier | Specificity R1 + R2 | 30% (26%; 35%) | 89% (87%; 91%) | 71 | 0.19 | 0.23 (0.07; 0.38) | |
| Classifier | Maximum MCC | 60% (56%; 65%) | 70% (67%; 73%) | 67 | 0.31 | 0.29 (0.12; 0.44) |
Classifier metrics are shown at cut-off points according to neuroradiologist readers’ specificities and at the classifiers optimal operating point
MCC Matthews correlation coefficient, CI confidence interval, PCA posterior cerebral artery
*P value < 0.05; **P value < 0.01. P values refer to significance of difference between classifier and human readers MCC values
Fig. 3Feature importance contribution of employed 20 most important features in %. a By applied filter and pc-ASPECTS region; b by feature class and pc-ASPECTS region. Texture feature class includes gray level size zone matrix, gray level dependence matrix, gray level run length matrix and gray level co-occurrence matrix. ROI region of interest, PCA posterior cerebral artery