| Literature DB >> 32393382 |
Barbara Hinney1, Julia Schoiswohl2, Lynsey Melville3, Vahel J Ameen4,5, Walpurga Wille-Piazzai6, Karl Bauer7, Anja Joachim6, Jürgen Krücken4, Philip J Skuce3, Reinhild Krametter-Frötscher2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infections of small ruminants with trichostrongyloid nematodes often result in reduced productivity and may be detrimental to the host. Anthelmintic resistance (AR) against most anthelmintic drug classes is now widespread amongst the trichostrongyloids. Baseline establishment, followed by regular monitoring of the level of AR, is necessary for farmers and veterinarians to make informed decisions about parasite management. The detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is a sensitive method to detect AR against benzimidazoles (BZs), one of the most widely used anthelmintic classes. Alpine transhumance constitutes a special type of pasturing of sheep from many different farms, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of benzimidazole resistance alleles in this particular management system.Entities:
Keywords: Anthelmintic resistance; Nematode; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Trichostrongyloids, pyrosequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32393382 PMCID: PMC7216349 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02353-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Frequencies of alleles containing the F167Y, E198A and F200Y exchanges correlating with benzimidazole resistance for Haemonchus contortus, Teladorsagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis. (< 5% = below background threshold)
| Farm | N larvae in pooled samples | % of trichostrongyloid species in pooled third stage larval samples used for pyrosequencing | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (FT)* | 1566 | 4 | 7 | 32 | 49; 71a | n.a. | < 5 | 100 | < 5 |
| 2 (FT)** | 17,600 | 48 | 2 | 36 | 96 | 66 | < 5 | 99 | < 5 |
| 5* | 1600 | 36 | 5 | 39 | 87 | 18 | n.a. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 6** | 500 | 0 | 8 | 66 | n.a. | < 5 | < 5 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 7** | 8500 | 30 | 12 | 39 | 98 | n.a. | n.a. | n.d. | n.d. |
| 8* | 61,666 | 21 | 2 | 42 | n.a. | 48 | < 5 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 10 (FT)** | 2000 | 39 | 8 | 50 | 100 | 11 | n.a. | 100 | < 5 |
| 11* | 2666 | 14 | 2 | 14 | 94 | 40 | < 5 | n.d. | n.d. |
| 12 (FT) | 42,666 | 16 | 8 | 53 | n.a. | 47 | < 5 | 98 | 7 |
| 13 (FT)** | 2666 | 2 | 22 | 58 | 100; 94a | 31 | < 5 | 95 | 9 |
| 14* | n.d. | 11 | 9 | 36 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 82 | 19 |
| 15 (FT)* | n.d. | 3 | 17 | 61 | n.a. | n.a. | < 5 | 100 | 6 |
n.d. No data (no DNA left for analysis); n.a. No amplicon generated; FT Full-time farms, all other farms were sideline enterprises (small-holder farms); *: indicates farms that used dewormers once a year; **: indicates farms that used dewormers two times a year; bold letters: farms where a reduced efficacy of moxidectin had been observed; aTwo samples were examined
Description of primers used
| Targeted trichostrongyloid species; primer name | Sequence 5′ to 3′ | Size [base pairs] | Tm [°C] | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HcPy2PCR For | GAC GCA TTC ACT TGG AGG AG | 400 | 53 | [ |
| HcPy2PCR Rev | Biotin-CAT AGG TTG GAT TTG TGA GTT | |||
| F200Y_FOR | Biotin- ACC TTA CAA TGC CAC TCT TTC TG | 100 | 58 | [ |
| F200Y_REV | GCG GAA GCA GAT ATC GTA CAG | |||
| F167Y_FOR | GCA TTC TTT GGG AGG AGG TA | 200 | 58 | |
| F167Y_REV | Biotin-TGC ACC TCG AGA ACC TGT ACA TA | |||
| FOR | TAC CCA GAT CGG ATT ATG TCT TC | 58 | [ | |
| REV | Biotin – GGC AAG TCG TGA CAC CAG ACA | |||
| Hc200PySeq1 ( | TAG AGA ACA CCG ATG AAA | Not applicable | [ | |
| T. circ. F200Y_SEQ ( | RGA GCY TCA TTA TCG ATR | [ | ||
| T. circ. F167Y_SEQ ( | CGG ATA GAA TCA TGG CT | [ | ||
| GCA GTA CTC GTG TC | [ | |||
| CGG ATA GAA TCA TGG CT | ||||
Abbreviations
AR Anthelmintic resistanceBZ Benzimidazole anthelminticsGIN Gastrointestinal nematodesSNP Single nucleotide polymorphismML Macrocyclic lactonesFECRT Faecal egg count reduction testEHT Egg hatch test