The development of anthelmintic resistance with best practice control of nematodes on commercial sheep farms in the UK.

Antimicrobial resistance threatens the effective prevention and treatment of an ever-increasing range of infections. The widespread development of anthelmintic resistance is a major global issue affecting the effective control of parasite diseases in grazing livestock production. Sustainable control strategies that reduce dependence on antimicrobials have the potential to slow the further development of resistance but there is little data on the effect of control strategies on resistance development in the field. This report documents a study undertaken to measure the temporal effect of the UK sustainable control of parasites in sheep (SCOPS) guidelines on the development of anthelmintic resistance. Farms carrying out SCOPS or traditional worm control (TRADITIONAL) were tested for resistance to the benzimidazole and imidazothiazole anthelmintics in vitro using a discriminating dose (dd) larval development test (LDT) in year 1 and then 7 years later. In years 5 and 7, resistance was also measured using a dose-response LDT assay. There was a significant increase in Teladorsagia survivors at the benzimidazole dd assay between year 1 and year 7 for both treatment groups, but the increase in survivors was greater for the farms carrying out their traditional worm control compared to the SCOPS farms. There was also a significant difference between benzimidazole dd results generated across years for Trichostrongylus, but the year and treatment interaction was not significant. Only one of the farm Teladorsagia populations had survivors in the imidazothiazole dd assay in years 1 and 7 and none of the Trichostrongylus populations survived in year 1 compared to isolates from three of the farms in year 7. Dose-response data showed a significant effect for time for both the benzimidazole and imidazothiazole anthelmintics and the increase was again significantly higher for the Teladorsagia populations in the TRADITIONAL group compared to the SCOPS group. This data suggests an increased sensitivity both to detect and to measure changes in response to anthelmintics with the dose-response assay compared to the dd and this is important particularly when allele frequencies are low as might be the case when novel compounds are released to the market. Anthelmintic use across years 5-7 was significantly lower for the farms in the SCOPS group compared to the TRADITIONAL group and farmers in the SCOPS group had selected products from the benzimidazole group less often than farmers in the TRADITIONAL group. Both groups had made minimal use of the imidazothiazole anthelmintic classes and the majority of ewe treatments were selected from the macrocyclic lactone class. Further research is required to determine the effect of these anthelmintic choices on the development of resistance to the macrocyclic lactones. Crown