| Literature DB >> 32392800 |
K M Faridul Hasan1, Péter György Horváth1, Tibor Alpár1.
Abstract
Composite materials reinforced with biofibers and nanomaterials are becoming considerably popular, especially for their light weight, strength, exceptional stiffness, flexural rigidity, damping property, longevity, corrosion, biodegradability, antibacterial, and fire-resistant properties. Beside the traditional thermoplastic and thermosetting polymers, nanoparticles are also receiving attention in terms of their potential to improve the functionality and mechanical performances of biocomposites. These remarkable characteristics have made nanobiocomposite materials convenient to apply in aerospace, mechanical, construction, automotive, marine, medical, packaging, and furniture industries, through providing environmental sustainability. Nanoparticles (TiO2, carbon nanotube, rGO, ZnO, and SiO2) are easily compatible with other ingredients (matrix polymer and biofibers) and can thus form nanobiocomposites. Nanobiocomposites are exhibiting a higher market volume with the expansion of new technology and green approaches for utilizing biofibers. The performances of nanobiocomposites depend on the manufacturing processes, types of biofibers used, and the matrix polymer (resin). An overview of different natural fibers (vegetable/plants), nanomaterials, biocomposites, nanobiocomposites, and manufacturing methods are discussed in the context of potential application in this review.Entities:
Keywords: biocomposites; biofiber; functionality; nanobiocomposites; nanofiller; polymer; reinforcements
Year: 2020 PMID: 32392800 PMCID: PMC7284945 DOI: 10.3390/polym12051072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Natural fiber classification, according to the origin, with examples. Adapted with permission from Elsevier [9]. Copyright Elsevier, 2019.
A brief summary on the merits and demerits of biofiber-reinforced biocomposites (BCs) and NBCs over traditional petroleum-based composites [11].
| Number | Merits | Demerits |
|---|---|---|
| (a) | Comparatively lighter | Higher moisture absorption |
| (b) | Low cost | Low impact strength |
| (c) | Biodegradability | Poor flame retardancy |
| (d) | Renewability | Not suitable with a higher processing temperature |
| (e) | Better insulation and thermal performances | Poor resistance to microbial attack |
| (f) | Nontoxicity | Variation in quality |
| (g) | Environment-friendly | Complex supply chain of natural fibers for geographic locations and availability |
| (h) | No irritations with physical contact | / |
| (i) | Low energy consumption | / |
| (j) | Best alternatives for replacing synthetic fibers | / |
Figure 2Formation mechanism of nanobiocomposites (NBCs).
Figure 3Biodegradation of biofiber-based composites. Adapted with permission from Reference [8]. Copyright Polymedia Publisher GmbH, 2009.
Figure 4Different chemical structures of natural fibers: (a) Cellulose; (b) Hemicellulose; (c) Phenols in lignin; and (d) Pectin. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier [10]. Copyright Elsevier, 2015.
Chemical compositions of different natural fibers [11,38,39,40,41].
| Fibers | Cellulose | Hemi- | Lignin | Pectin | Waxes | Moisture Content/ | Ash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | 89 | 4 | 0.75 | 6 | 0.6 | -- | -- |
| Jute | 45 to 71.5 | 13.6 to 21 | 12 to 26 | 0.2 | -- | 12 | 0.5 to 2.0 |
| Hemp | 57 to 77 | 14 to 22.4 | 3.7 to 13 | 0.9 | -- | 9 | 0.8 |
| Flax | 71 | 18.6 to 20.6 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 8 to 12 | 5 to 10 |
| Coir | 32 to 43 | 0.15 to 0.25 | 40 to 45 | 3 to 4 | -- | 8 | |
| Sisal | 47 to 77 | 10 to 24 | 7 to 11 | 10 | -- | 11 | 0.6 to 1.0 |
| Kenaf | 53.5 | 21 | 17 | 2 | -- | -- | 2 to 5 |
| Sugarcane Bagasse | 32 to 34 | 19 to 24 | 25 to 32 | -- | -- | 6 to 12 | 2 to 6 |
| Bamboo | 73.83 | 12.49 | 10.15 | 0.37 | -- | 3.16-8.9 | -- |
| Ramie | 68.6 to 91 | 5 to 16.7 | 0.6 to 0.7 | 1.9 | -- | 9 | -- |
Typical properties of some selected natural fibers [11,34,53,54,55,56,57].
| Fibers | Elongation (%) | Density (g/cm3) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Decomposition Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | 3 to 10 | 1.5 to 1.6 | 5.5 to 12.6 | 287 to 597 | 232 |
| Jute | 1.5 to 1.8 | 1.3 to 1.46 | 10 to 30 | 393 to 800 | 215 |
| Hemp | 1.6 | 1.48 | 70 | 550 to 900 | 215 |
| Flax | 1.2 to 3.2 | 1.4 to 1.5 | 27.6 to 80 | 345 to 1500 | 220 |
| Coir | 15 to 30 | 1.2 | 4 to 6 | 175 to 220 | 285 to 465 |
| Sisal | 2 to 14 | 1.33 to 1.5 | 9 to 38 | 400 to 700 | 205 to 220 |
| Kenaf | 1.6 to 4.3 | 0.6 to 1.5 | 11 to 60 | 223 to 1191 | 229 |
| Sugarcane Bagasse | 6.3 to 7.9 | 1.1 to 1.6 | 5.1 to 6.2 | 170 to 350 | 232 |
| Bamboo | 1.9 to 3.2 | 1.2 to 1.5 | 27 to 40 | 500 to 575 | 214 |
| Ramie | 2.3 to 3.8 | 1.5 | 44 to 128 | 220 to 938 | 240 |
Figure 5Images of natural biofibers [34,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68].
Application, manufacturing method, and matrix materials of some potential natural fibers.
| Reinforcing Fibers | Polymeric Matrix | Manufacturing Method | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | Polylactic acid (PLA), silane, and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) | Extrusion and injection molding | Building, automotive, furniture, and food packaging | [ |
| Jute | Polyester and PP | Compression/injection molding and hand lay-up | Door panels, ropes, roofing, durable chairs, kitchen sinks, sanitary latrines (slab and rings), helmets, and chest guards | [ |
| Hemp | Polyethylene (PE), polyurethane (PU), and PP | Compression molding and resin transfer molding (RTM) | Automotives and furniture | [ |
| Flax | Epoxy, PLA, polyester, and PP | Vacuum infusion, RTM, and hand lay-up | Textile, automotive and structural | [ |
| Coir | PE, PP, and epoxy resin | Extrusion and injection molding | Building boards, insulation boards, roofing sheets, and automotive structural components | [ |
| Sisal | Polystyrene(PS), PP, and epoxy resin | Compression molding and hand lay-up | Body parts of automobiles and roofing sheets | [ |
| Kenaf | Epoxy resin, PLA, and PP | Pultrusion and compression molding | Bearings, automotive parts, and tooling | [ |
| Sugarcane Bagasse | HDPE and poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) | Compression molding, injection molding, and extrusion | Interior of automotives (side panels, seat frames, and central consuls) | [ |
| Bamboo | Epoxy resin and PLA | Compression molding | Hardware for electronics, furniture, and toys | [ |
| Ramie | PLA, PP, and polyolefin | Injection molding through extrusion | Civil and bulletproof vests | [ |
Figure 6Images of bacterial nanocellulose, a cellulose nanofiber, and cellulose nanocrystals. Adapted with permission from reference [98,99]. Copyright MDPI, 2020 (BNC and CNF). Copyright NAS (National Academy of Sciences of United States of America), 2018 (CNC).
The melting temperature (Tm) and glass transition temperature (Tg) of some commonly used resins [11].
| Resin | Melting Temperature ( | Glass Transition Temperature ( |
|---|---|---|
| PLA | 150 to 162 | 58 |
| PP | 160 to 176 | 0.9 to 1.55 |
| Nylon 6 | 22 | 40 |
| Polyester | 250 to 300 | 60 |
| LDPE | 105 to 116 | 120 |
| HDPE | 120 to 140 | 80 |
| Epoxy | - | 70 to 67 |
| Starch | 110 to 115 | 60 |
| Polystyrene | - | 110–135 |
Figure 7Reaction mechanism of a biofiber and maleic anhydride. Adapted from Elsevier [111]. Copyright Elsevier, 2012.
Figure 8Tensile test for the PLA/flax fiber composites breaking area after the test. Figure republished from Alpár, Markó, and Koroknai (2017), with permission from John Wiley & Sons [123]. Copyright John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
Figure 9Nano objects used for nanobiocomposites, according to ISO/TS27687 (2008). Adapted from reference [135]. Copyright IntechOpen, 2011.
Figure 10Sustainable features and potentiality of NBCs.
Figure 11Different applications of BCs and NBCs. Under floor protection trims and S class of Mercedes are produced with the permission from Elsevier, 2008; Nanocellulose diaphragm (2011) was reprinted with the permission from author [171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179].