Literature DB >> 32325583

Life cycle assessment of bagasse fiber reinforced biocomposites.

Diana Ita-Nagy1, Ian Vázquez-Rowe1, Ramzy Kahhat1, Isabel Quispe2, Gary Chinga-Carrasco3, Nicolás M Clauser4, María Cristina Area4.   

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the life cycle environmental implications of producing fiber-reinforced biocomposite pellets, compared with sugarcane- and petroleum-based polyethylene (PE) pellets. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology is used to evaluate the production of four types of pellets. LCA allows the evaluation of the benefits of improving the production of biobased materials by replacing part of the sugarcane bioPE with bagasse fibers. The functional unit selected was the production of 1 kg of plastic pellets. Primary data were collected from laboratory tests designed to obtain pulp fibers from bagasse and mix them with sugarcane bioPE. Two processes were studied to obtain fibers from bagasse: soda fractionation and hot water-soda fractionation. The results from the LCA show environmental improvements when reducing the amount of bioPE by replacing it with bagasse fibers in the categories of global warming, ozone formation, terrestrial acidification and fossil resource scarcity, when comparing to 100% sugarcane bioPE, and a reduction in global warming and fossil resource scarcity when compared to fossil-based PE. In contrast, results also indicate that there could be higher impacts in terms of ozone formation, freshwater eutrophication, and terrestrial acidification. Even though biocomposites result as a preferred option to bioPE, several challenges need to be overcome before a final recommendation is placed. The sensitivity analysis showed the importance of the energy source on the impacts of the processing of fibers. Thus, using clean energy to produce biobased materials may reduce the impacts related to the production stage. These results are intended to increase the attention of the revalorization of these residues and their application to generate more advanced materials. Further outlook should also consider a deeper evaluation of the impacts during the production of a plastic object and possible effects of the biobased materials during final disposal.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biobased materials; Biocomposites; Biopolymers; GHG emissions; Life cycle assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32325583     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

Review 1.  The limitations of bioeconomy LCA studies for understanding the transition to sustainable bioeconomy.

Authors:  Nishtha Talwar; Nicholas M Holden
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.257

2.  Biocomposites of Bio-Polyethylene Reinforced with a Hydrothermal-Alkaline Sugarcane Bagasse Pulp and Coupled with a Bio-Based Compatibilizer.

Authors:  Nanci Vanesa Ehman; Diana Ita-Nagy; Fernando Esteban Felissia; María Evangelina Vallejos; Isabel Quispe; María Cristina Area; Gary Chinga-Carrasco
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  Lignocellulosic Materials for the Production of Biofuels, Biochemicals and Biomaterials and Applications of Lignocellulose-Based Polyurethanes: A Review.

Authors:  Antonio M Borrero-López; Concepción Valencia; José M Franco
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 4.  Potential Natural Fiber Polymeric Nanobiocomposites: A Review.

Authors:  K M Faridul Hasan; Péter György Horváth; Tibor Alpár
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.329

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.