Literature DB >> 25734827

Well water contamination in a rural community in southwestern Pennsylvania near unconventional shale gas extraction.

Shyama K Alawattegama1, Tetiana Kondratyuk, Renee Krynock, Matthew Bricker, Jennifer K Rutter, Daniel J Bain, John F Stolz.   

Abstract

Reports of ground water contamination in a southwestern Pennsylvania community coincided with unconventional shale gas extraction activities that started late 2009. Residents participated in a survey and well water samples were collected and analyzed. Available pre-drill and post-drill water test results and legacy operations (e.g., gas and oil wells, coal mining) were reviewed. Fifty-six of the 143 respondents indicated changes in water quality or quantity while 63 respondents reported no issues. Color change (brown, black, or orange) was the most common (27 households). Well type, when known, was rotary or cable tool, and depths ranged from 19 to 274 m. Chloride, sulfate, nitrate, sodium, calcium, magnesium, iron, manganese and strontium were commonly found, with 25 households exceeding the secondary maximum contaminate level (SMCL) for manganese. Methane was detected in 14 of the 18 houses tested. The 26 wells tested for total coliforms (2 positives) and E. coli (1 positive) indicated that septic contamination was not a factor. Repeated sampling of two wells in close proximity (204 m) but drawing from different depths (32 m and 54 m), revealed temporal variability. Since 2009, 65 horizontal wells were drilled within a 4 km (2.5 mile) radius of the community, each well was stimulated on average with 3.5 million gal of fluids and 3.2 million lbs of proppant. PA DEP cited violations included an improperly plugged well and at least one failed well casing. This study underscores the need for thorough analyses of data, documentation of legacy activity, pre-drill testing, and long term monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Marcellus shale; gas wells; hydraulic fracturing; water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25734827     DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2015.992684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng        ISSN: 1093-4529            Impact factor:   2.269


  6 in total

Review 1.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Detecting and explaining why aquifers occasionally become degraded near hydraulically fractured shale gas wells.

Authors:  Josh Woda; Tao Wen; David Oakley; David Yoxtheimer; Terry Engelder; M Clara Castro; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Exploring the endocrine activity of air pollutants associated with unconventional oil and gas extraction.

Authors:  Ashley L Bolden; Kim Schultz; Katherine E Pelch; Carol F Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.