Literature DB >> 24076504

Evaluation of impact of shale gas operations in the Barnett Shale region on volatile organic compounds in air and potential human health risks.

A G Bunch1, C S Perry, L Abraham, D S Wikoff, J A Tachovsky, J G Hixon, J D Urban, M A Harris, L C Haws.   

Abstract

Shale gas exploration and production (E&P) has experienced substantial growth across the U.S. over the last decade. The Barnett Shale, in north-central Texas, contains one of the largest, most active onshore gas fields in North America, stretching across 5000 square miles and having an estimated 15,870 producing wells as of 2011. Given that these operations may occur in relatively close proximity to populated/urban areas, concerns have been expressed about potential impacts on human health. In response to these concerns, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality established an extensive air monitoring network in the region. This network provides a unique data set for evaluating the potential impact of shale gas E&P activities on human health. As such, the objective of this study was to evaluate community-wide exposures to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the Barnett Shale region. In this current study, more than 4.6 million data points (representing data from seven monitors at six locations, up to 105 VOCs/monitor, and periods of record dating back to 2000) were evaluated. Measured air concentrations were compared to federal and state health-based air comparison values (HBACVs) to assess potential acute and chronic health effects. None of the measured VOC concentrations exceeded applicable acute HBACVs. Only one chemical (1,2-dibromoethane) exceeded its applicable chronic HBACV, but it is not known to be associated with shale gas production activities. Annual average concentrations were also evaluated in deterministic and probabilistic risk assessments and all risks/hazards were below levels of concern. The analyses demonstrate that, for the extensive number of VOCs measured, shale gas production activities have not resulted in community-wide exposures to those VOCs at levels that would pose a health concern. With the high density of active wells in this region, these findings may be useful for understanding potential health risks in other shale play regions.
© 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality; Human health; Natural gas; Risk assessment; Shale

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076504     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  26 in total

1.  Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Public Participation in Air Sampling and Water Quality Test Kit Development to Enable Citizen Science.

Authors:  Erin N Haynes; Timothy J Hilbert; Rusty Roberts; John Quirolgico; Rachael Shepler; Gerry Beckner; Jennifer Veevers; Jeff Burkle; Roman Jandarov
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

Review 3.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Extraction into Air.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  The role of toxicological science in meeting the challenges and opportunities of hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein; Bryan W Brooks; Steven D Cohen; Alexander E Gates; Michael E Honeycutt; John B Morris; Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta; Trevor M Penning; John Snawder
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Impact of natural gas extraction on PAH levels in ambient air.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Risk assessment of occupational exposure to benzene using numerical simulation in a complex geometry of a reforming unit of petroleum refinery.

Authors:  Majid Bayatian; Khosro Ashrafi; Mansour Rezazadeh Azari; Mohammad Javad Jafari; Yadollah Mehrabi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Air monitoring of volatile organic compounds at relevant receptors during hydraulic fracturing operations in Washington County, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Joshua R Maskrey; Allison L Insley; Erin S Hynds; Julie M Panko
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.