| Literature DB >> 32385414 |
Die Xu1, Wenjuan Zou2, Yong Luo1, Xuan Gao1, Binglei Jiang1, Yaotai Wang1, Fujie Jiang1, Jie Xiong1, Chun Chen1, Yu Tang1, Hai Qiao1, Huanan Li1, Jianzhong Zou3.
Abstract
High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been recently shown as a rapidly developing new technique for non-invasive ablation of local tumors whose therapeutic efficiency can be significantly improved by changing the tissue acoustic environment (AET). Currently, the method of changing AET is mainly to introduce a medium with high acoustic impedance, but there are some disadvantages such as low retention of the introduced medium in the target area and a short residence time during the process. In our strategy, anaerobic bacterium Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum) which can colonize selectively in hypoxic regions of the animal body was successfully localized and shown to proliferate in the hypoxic zone of tumor tissue, overcoming the above disadvantages. This study aimed to explore the effects of Bifidobacteria on AET (including the structure and acoustic properties of tumor tissues) and HIFU ablation at different time. The results show that the injection of Bifidobacteria increased the collagen fibre number, elastic modulus and sound velocity and decreased neovascularization in tumor tissues. The number of collagen fibres and neovascularization decreased significantly over time. Under the same HIFU irradiation intensity, the B. longum injection increased the coagulative necrosis volume and decreased the energy efficiency factor (EEF). This study confirmed that Bifidobacteria can change the AET and increase the deposition of ultrasonic energy and thereby the efficiency of HIFU. In addition, the time that Bifidobacteria stay in the tumor area after injection is an important factor. This research provides a novel approach for synergistic biologically targeted HIFU therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32385414 PMCID: PMC7210962 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64661-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Gram staining of pathological tissue for evaluating the growth and distribution of Bifidobacterium longum in various normal tissues (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) and tumors (200× magnification). The Bifidobacteria are observed by blue staining, as indicated by the arrows.
Figure 2(a) The comparison of ultrasound velocity in tumor tissues in each group. (b) The comparison of attenuation of ultrasound energy in tumor tissues in each group.Attenuation of ultrasound energy in tumor tissue (n=10). (c) Stress-strain curve obtained by biomechanical testing (n=10). (d) The comparison of elastic modulus in tumor tissues in each group.
Figure 3(a1-a4) Masson staining of tumor tissues (200× magnification). The blue areas indicated by the arrows are collagen fibres. (b1-b4) Immunohistochemistry examination of tumor tissues (CD31 staining; 200× magnification). The arrows indicate new blood vessels. (c) The comparison of collagen fibre content of tumor tissues in each group. (d) The comparison of neovascular density of tumor tissues in each group.
Figure 4(a) In vivo ultrasound imaging of tumors (indicated by red arrows) before and after HIFU ablation. (b)The comparison of gray values of tumor tissues in each group after HIFU irradiation. (c) The comparison of coagulative necrotic volume of tumor tissues in each group after HIFU irradiation. (d) The comparison of EEF values of tumor tissues in each group after HIFU irradiation. (e) HE staining of tumor tissues of each group after HIFU irradiation (100 × magnification). (f) TTC staining of each group of tumor tissues after HIFU irradiation, Greyish white areas represent coagulative necrosis caused by HIFU irradiation.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of the devices for detection of the acoustic properties (sound velocity and sound attenuation) of tumor tissue.