Literature DB >> 32384370

Epidemiological trends of surgical admissions to the intensive care unit in the United States.

Victor Vakayil1, Nicholas E Ingraham, Alexandria J Robbins, Rebecca Freese, Elise F Northrop, Melissa E Brunsvold, Kathryn M Pendleton, Anthony Charles, Jeffrey G Chipman, Christopher J Tignanelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic assessment of surgical admissions into intensive care units (ICUs) provides a framework to evaluate health care system efficiency and project future health care needs.
METHODS: We performed a 9-year (2008-2016), retrospective, cohort analysis of all adult admissions to 88 surgical ICUs using the prospectively and manually abstracted Cerner Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Outcomes database. We stratified patients into 13 surgical cohorts and modeled temporal trends in admission, mortality, surgical ICU length of stay (LOS), and change in functional status (FS) using generalized mixed-effects and Quasi-Poisson models to obtain risk-adjusted outcomes.
RESULTS: We evaluated 78,053 ICU admissions and observed a significant decrease in admissions after transplant and thoracic surgery, with a concomitant increase in admissions after otolaryngological and facial reconstructive procedures (all p < 0.05). While overall risk-adjusted mortality remained stable over the study period; mortality significantly declined in orthopedic, cardiac, urologic, and neurosurgical patients (all p < 0.05). Cardiac, urologic, gastrointestinal, neurosurgical, and orthopedic admissions showed significant reductions in LOS (all p < 0.05). The overall rate of FS deterioration increased per year, suggesting ICU-related disability increased over the study period.
CONCLUSION: Temporal analysis demonstrates a significant change in the type of surgical patients admitted to the ICU over the last decade, with decreasing mortality and LOS in selected cohorts, but an increasing rate of FS deterioration. Improvement in ICU outcomes may highlight the success of health care advancements within certain surgical cohorts, while simultaneously identifying cohorts that may benefit from future intervention. Our findings have significant implications in health care systems planning, including resource and personnel allocation, education, and surgical training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision, level IV.Epidemiologic, level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32384370      PMCID: PMC7799916          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.697


  42 in total

Review 1.  Chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Christopher E Cox; Aluko A Hope; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Critical Care Beds and Resource Utilization: Current Trends and Controversies.

Authors:  Nicholas S Ward; David H Chong
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 3.  Health services research in critical care using administrative data.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; David A Harrison; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Reliability of a measure of severity of illness: acute physiology of chronic health evaluation--II.

Authors:  A M Damiano; M Bergner; E A Draper; W A Knaus; D P Wagner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Five-Year Trends of Critical Care Practice and Outcomes.

Authors:  Craig M Lilly; Sunil Swami; Xinggang Liu; Richard R Riker; Omar Badawi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Hospital volume and the outcomes of mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Christopher H Goss; Patrick J Heagerty; Andrew A Kramer; Chelsea R O'Brien; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.

Authors:  Greg S Martin; David M Mannino; Stephanie Eaton; Marc Moss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Quality of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. A summary of effects.

Authors:  W H Rogers; D Draper; K L Kahn; E B Keeler; L V Rubenstein; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The impact of changes in intensive care organization on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness-a narrative review.

Authors:  Alexander F van der Sluijs; Eline R van Slobbe-Bijlsma; Stephen E Chick; Margreeth B Vroom; Dave A Dongelmans; Alexander P J Vlaar
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2017-01-25

Review 10.  Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults.

Authors:  Neill K J Adhikari; Robert A Fowler; Satish Bhagwanjee; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Discordant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Code Status at Death.

Authors:  Alexandria J Robbins; Nicholas E Ingraham; Adam C Sheka; Kathryn M Pendleton; Rachel Morris; Alexander Rix; Victor Vakayil; Jeffrey G Chipman; Anthony Charles; Christopher J Tignanelli
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Morbidity and Mortality Trends of Pancreatitis: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Nicholas E Ingraham; Samantha King; Jennifer Proper; Lianne Siegel; Emily J Zolfaghari; Thomas A Murray; Victor Vakayil; Adam Sheka; Ruoying Feng; Gabriel Guzman; Samit Sunny Roy; Dhannanjay Muddappa; Michael G Usher; Jeffrey G Chipman; Christopher J Tignanelli; Kathryn M Pendleton
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.150

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.