Literature DB >> 18423295

Flapless implant surgery: review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computer-guided surgical approach.

Abbas Azari1, Sakineh Nikzad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Modern implantology uses techniques that can provide function, esthetics, and comfort with a minimally invasive surgical approach. Flapless implant surgery has been proposed to fulfill these requirements. Traditionally, flapless implant surgery was carried out by using a tissue punch technique, which may be potentially harmful because of the inherent blindness of the technique. The purpose of this article is to introduce a predictable flapless approach for treatment of 2 patients through principles of computer-guided implantology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using dedicated interactive computer software programs and 3D radiographic techniques such as computed tomography (CT), the precise location of each implant was planned. Using the concept "prosthetic-driven implantology," surgery was carried out for the rehabilitation of 2 patients.
RESULTS: The procedure of implant planning in this sophisticated technique has potential to yield substantial public health benefits.
CONCLUSION: Although this modern approach may have many advantages, transferring virtual planning to the patient's mouth has only been developed recently. Further research is required to justify this novel approach for implant rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18423295     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  8 in total

1.  Imaging, virtual planning, design, and production of patient-specific implants and clinical validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Per Dérand; Lars-Erik Rännar; Jan-M Hirsch
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-09

2.  Increasing volume of vestibular soft tissues in flapless implant surgery through a modified connective punch technique: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  M Andreasi Bassi; C Andrisani; S Lico; F Silvestre; M Gargari; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

Review 3.  In-Office Guided Implant Placement for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Daryoush Karami; Hamid Reza Alborzinia; Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Navid Yousefi; Sarina Badakhshan
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-07-19

4.  Open flap versus flapless placement of dental implants. A randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Enric Jané-Salas; Xavier Roselló-LLabrés; Enric Jané-Pallí; Siddharth Mishra; Raúl Ayuso-Montero; José López-López
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 5.  Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review.

Authors:  Gokce-Soganci Unsal; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Samantha Lakhia
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 6.  Computerized implant-dentistry: Advances toward automation.

Authors:  Minkle Gulati; Vishal Anand; Sanjeev Kumar Salaria; Nikil Jain; Shilpi Gupta
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

7.  A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template.

Authors:  Shin-Young Youk; Jee-Ho Lee; Ji-Man Park; Seong-Joo Heo; Hyun-Ki Roh; Eun-Jin Park; Im Hee Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Double Guided Surgery in All-on-4® Concept: When Ostectomy Is Needed.

Authors:  Gabriele Tonellini; Raquel Saez Vigo; Giorgio Novelli
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-02-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.