Literature DB >> 32379942

Estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI by extracting long and short time-dependent features using an LSTM network.

Jiaren Zou1, James M Balter1,2, Yue Cao1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: T1 -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) is typically quantified by least squares (LS) fitting to a pharmacokinetic (PK) model to yield parameters of microvasculature and perfusion in normal and disease tissues. Such fitting is both time-consuming as well as subject to inaccuracy and instability in parameter estimates. Here, we propose a novel neural network approach to estimate the PK parameters by extracting long and short time-dependent features in DCE-MRI.
METHODS: A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, widely used for processing sequence data, was employed to map DCE-MRI time-series accompanied with an arterial input function to parameters of the extended Tofts model. Head and neck DCE-MRI from 103 patients were used for training and testing the LSTM model. Arterial input functions (AIFs) from 78 patients were used to generate synthetic DCE-MRI time-series for training, during which data augmentation was used to overcome the limited size of in vivo data. The model was tested on independent synthesized DCE data using AIFs from 25 patients. The LSTM performance was optimized for the numbers of layers and hidden state features. The performance of the LSTM was tested for different temporal resolution, total acquisition time, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and compared to the conventional LS fitting and a CNN-based method.
RESULTS: Compared to LS fitting, the LSTM model had comparable accuracy in PK parameter estimations from fully temporal-sampled DCE-MRI data (~3 s per frame), but much better accuracy for the data with temporally subsampling (4s or greater per frame), total acquisition time truncation by 48%-16%, or low CNR (5 and 10). The LSTM reduced normalized root mean squared error by 40.4%, 46.9%, and 53.0% for sampling intervals of 4s, 5s, and 6s, respectively, compared to LS fitting. Compared to the CNN model, the LSTM model reduced the error in the parameter estimates up to 55.2%. Also, the LSTM improved the inference time by ~ 14 times on CPU compared to LS fitting.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the LSTM model could achieve improved robustness and computation speed for PK parameter estimation compared to LS fitting and the CNN based network, particularly for suboptimal data.
© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE-MRI; contrast agent; long-short-term memory; machine learning; pharmacokinetic model; temporal correlation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32379942      PMCID: PMC7429301          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Fundamentals of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Paldino; Daniel P Barboriak
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 4.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  An efficient calculation method for pharmacokinetic parameters in brain permeability study using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Bolus arrival time estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of small animals based on spline models.

Authors:  Alina L Bendinger; Charlotte Debus; Christin Glowa; Christian P Karger; Jörg Peter; Martin Storath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  S Gaddikeri; R S Gaddikeri; T Tailor; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  ESPIRiT--an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA.

Authors:  Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Developing a Pipeline for Multiparametric MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy: Initial Results from a Phase II Clinical Trial in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michelle M Kim; Hemant A Parmar; Madhava P Aryal; Charles S Mayo; James M Balter; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Maximum Entropy Technique and Regularization Functional for Determining the Pharmacokinetic Parameters in DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Zahra Amini Farsani; Volker J Schmid
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.903

2.  Breast Tumor Identification in Ultrafast MRI Using Temporal and Spatial Information.

Authors:  Xueping Jing; Monique D Dorrius; Mirjam Wielema; Paul E Sijens; Matthijs Oudkerk; Peter van Ooijen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Modified Maximum Entropy Method and Estimating the AIF via DCE-MRI Data Analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Amini Farsani; Volker J Schmid
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Direct inference of Patlak parametric images in whole-body PET/CT imaging using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Neda Zaker; Kamal Haddad; Reza Faghihi; Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 10.057

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.