Literature DB >> 32379003

Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Human Hippocampal Subfields: CA3-Dentate Gyrus Viscoelasticity Predicts Relational Memory Accuracy.

Ana M Daugherty1, Hillary D Schwarb2, Matthew D J McGarry3, Curtis L Johnson4, Neal J Cohen2.   

Abstract

The hippocampus is necessary for binding and reconstituting information in relational memory. These essential memory functions are supported by the distinct cytoarchitecture of the hippocampal subfields. Magnetic resonance elastography is an emerging tool that provides sensitive estimates of microstructure vis-à-vis tissue mechanical properties. Here, we report the first in vivo study of human hippocampal subfield viscoelastic stiffness and damping ratio. Stiffness describes resistance of a viscoelastic tissue to a stress and is thought to reflect the relative composition of tissue at the microscale; damping ratio describes relative viscous-to-elastic behavior and is thought to generally reflect microstructural organization. Measures from the subiculum (combined with presubiculum and parasubiculum), cornu ammonis (CA) 1-2, and CA3-dentate gyrus (CA3-DG) were collected in a sample of healthy, cognitively normal men (n = 20, age = 18-33 years). In line with known cytoarchitecture, the subiculum demonstrated the lowest damping ratio, followed by CA3-DG and then combined CA1-CA2. Moreover, damping ratio of the CA3-DG-potentially reflective of number of cells and their connections-predicted relational memory accuracy and alone replicated most of the variance in performance that was explained by the whole hippocampus. Stiffness did not differentiate the hippocampal subfields and was unrelated to task performance in this sample. Viscoelasticity measured with magnetic resonance elastography appears to be sensitive to microstructural properties relevant to specific memory function, even in healthy younger adults, and is a promising tool for future studies of hippocampal structure in aging and related diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32379003      PMCID: PMC7577400          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  64 in total

1.  Fractal network dimension and viscoelastic powerlaw behavior: II. An experimental study of structure-mimicking phantoms by magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Oleg Posnansky; Sebastian Hirsch; Michael Scheel; Matthias Taupitz; Juergen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Double dissociation of structure-function relationships in memory and fluid intelligence observed with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Kevin M Horecka; Matthew D J McGarry; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; John Huston; Clifford R Jack; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Use of a Rayleigh damping model in elastography.

Authors:  Matthew D J McGarry; Elijah E W Van Houten
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  APOE ε4 worsens hippocampal CA1 apical neuropil atrophy and episodic memory.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Kerchner; Daniela Berdnik; Jadon C Shen; Jeffrey D Bernstein; Michelle C Fenesy; Gayle K Deutsch; Tony Wyss-Coray; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Interneurons of the hippocampus.

Authors:  T F Freund; G Buzsáki
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Age differences in hippocampal subfield volumes from childhood to late adulthood.

Authors:  Ana M Daugherty; Andrew R Bender; Naftali Raz; Noa Ofen
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation.

Authors:  Benjamin S Elkin; Evren U Azeloglu; Kevin D Costa; Barclay Morrison
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  A harmonized segmentation protocol for hippocampal and parahippocampal subregions: Why do we need one and what are the key goals?

Authors:  Laura E M Wisse; Ana M Daugherty; Rosanna K Olsen; David Berron; Valerie A Carr; Craig E L Stark; Robert S C Amaral; Katrin Amunts; Jean C Augustinack; Andrew R Bender; Jeffrey D Bernstein; Marina Boccardi; Martina Bocchetta; Alison Burggren; M Mallar Chakravarty; Marie Chupin; Arne Ekstrom; Robin de Flores; Ricardo Insausti; Prabesh Kanel; Olga Kedo; Kristen M Kennedy; Geoffrey A Kerchner; Karen F LaRocque; Xiuwen Liu; Anne Maass; Nicolai Malykhin; Susanne G Mueller; Noa Ofen; Daniela J Palombo; Mansi B Parekh; John B Pluta; Jens C Pruessner; Naftali Raz; Karen M Rodrigue; Dorothee Schoemaker; Andrea T Shafer; Trevor A Steve; Nanthia Suthana; Lei Wang; Julie L Winterburn; Michael A Yassa; Paul A Yushkevich; Renaud la Joie
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Magnetic resonance elastography reveals altered brain viscoelasticity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Kerstin Riek; Jason M Millward; Isabell Hamann; Susanne Mueller; Caspar F Pfueller; Friedemann Paul; Jürgen Braun; Carmen Infante-Duarte; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mechanical Properties of the Developing Brain are Associated with Language Input and Vocabulary Outcome.

Authors:  Julie M Schneider; Grace McIlvain; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.113

2.  Quantifying stability of parameter estimates forin vivonearly incompressible transversely-isotropic brain MR elastography.

Authors:  Dhrubo Jyoti; Matthew McGarry; Elijah Van Houten; Damian Sowinski; Philip V Bayly; Curtis L Johnson; Keith Paulsen
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2022-04-05

3.  Mapping heterogenous anisotropic tissue mechanical properties with transverse isotropic nonlinear inversion MR elastography.

Authors:  Matthew McGarry; Elijah Van Houten; Damian Sowinski; Dhrubo Jyoti; Daniel R Smith; Diego A Caban-Rivera; Grace McIlvain; Philip Bayly; Curtis L Johnson; John Weaver; Keith Paulsen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 13.828

4.  Evaluation of cerebral cortex viscoelastic property estimation with nonlinear inversion magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Lucy V Hiscox; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.174

5.  Effect of Aging on the Viscoelastic Properties of Hippocampal Subfields Assessed with High-Resolution MR Elastography.

Authors:  Peyton L Delgorio; Lucy V Hiscox; Ana M Daugherty; Faria Sanjana; Ryan T Pohlig; James M Ellison; Christopher R Martens; Hillary Schwarb; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Mechanical properties of murine hippocampal subregions investigated by atomic force microscopy and in vivo magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Anna S Morr; Marcin Nowicki; Gergely Bertalan; Rafaela Vieira Silva; Carmen Infante Duarte; Stefan Paul Koch; Philipp Boehm-Sturm; Ute Krügel; Jürgen Braun; Barbara Steiner; Josef A Käs; Thomas Fuhs; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.