| Literature DB >> 27862600 |
Laura E M Wisse1, Ana M Daugherty2, Rosanna K Olsen3, David Berron4, Valerie A Carr5,6, Craig E L Stark7, Robert S C Amaral8,9,10, Katrin Amunts11,12,13, Jean C Augustinack14, Andrew R Bender15, Jeffrey D Bernstein16, Marina Boccardi17, Martina Bocchetta18, Alison Burggren19, M Mallar Chakravarty8,9, Marie Chupin20, Arne Ekstrom21,22, Robin de Flores23, Ricardo Insausti24, Prabesh Kanel25, Olga Kedo11, Kristen M Kennedy26, Geoffrey A Kerchner16, Karen F LaRocque5, Xiuwen Liu25, Anne Maass27, Nicolai Malykhin28,29,30, Susanne G Mueller31,32, Noa Ofen33,34, Daniela J Palombo35, Mansi B Parekh36, John B Pluta1, Jens C Pruessner37,38, Naftali Raz33,34, Karen M Rodrigue26, Dorothee Schoemaker37,38, Andrea T Shafer33,34, Trevor A Steve39, Nanthia Suthana19,40, Lei Wang41, Julie L Winterburn8,9, Michael A Yassa7,42, Paul A Yushkevich1, Renaud la Joie23.
Abstract
The advent of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled in vivo research in a variety of populations and diseases on the structure and function of hippocampal subfields and subdivisions of the parahippocampal gyrus. Because of the many extant and highly discrepant segmentation protocols, comparing results across studies is difficult. To overcome this barrier, the Hippocampal Subfields Group was formed as an international collaboration with the aim of developing a harmonized protocol for manual segmentation of hippocampal and parahippocampal subregions on high-resolution MRI. In this commentary we discuss the goals for this protocol and the associated key challenges involved in its development. These include differences among existing anatomical reference materials, striking the right balance between reliability of measurements and anatomical validity, and the development of a versatile protocol that can be adopted for the study of populations varying in age and health. The commentary outlines these key challenges, as well as the proposed solution of each, with concrete examples from our working plan. Finally, with two examples, we illustrate how the harmonized protocol, once completed, is expected to impact the field by producing measurements that are quantitatively comparable across labs and by facilitating the synthesis of findings across different studies.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; harmonization; hippocampus; parahippocampal gyrus; segmentation
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27862600 PMCID: PMC5167633 DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hippocampus ISSN: 1050-9631 Impact factor: 3.899