Literature DB >> 27862600

A harmonized segmentation protocol for hippocampal and parahippocampal subregions: Why do we need one and what are the key goals?

Laura E M Wisse1, Ana M Daugherty2, Rosanna K Olsen3, David Berron4, Valerie A Carr5,6, Craig E L Stark7, Robert S C Amaral8,9,10, Katrin Amunts11,12,13, Jean C Augustinack14, Andrew R Bender15, Jeffrey D Bernstein16, Marina Boccardi17, Martina Bocchetta18, Alison Burggren19, M Mallar Chakravarty8,9, Marie Chupin20, Arne Ekstrom21,22, Robin de Flores23, Ricardo Insausti24, Prabesh Kanel25, Olga Kedo11, Kristen M Kennedy26, Geoffrey A Kerchner16, Karen F LaRocque5, Xiuwen Liu25, Anne Maass27, Nicolai Malykhin28,29,30, Susanne G Mueller31,32, Noa Ofen33,34, Daniela J Palombo35, Mansi B Parekh36, John B Pluta1, Jens C Pruessner37,38, Naftali Raz33,34, Karen M Rodrigue26, Dorothee Schoemaker37,38, Andrea T Shafer33,34, Trevor A Steve39, Nanthia Suthana19,40, Lei Wang41, Julie L Winterburn8,9, Michael A Yassa7,42, Paul A Yushkevich1, Renaud la Joie23.   

Abstract

The advent of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled in vivo research in a variety of populations and diseases on the structure and function of hippocampal subfields and subdivisions of the parahippocampal gyrus. Because of the many extant and highly discrepant segmentation protocols, comparing results across studies is difficult. To overcome this barrier, the Hippocampal Subfields Group was formed as an international collaboration with the aim of developing a harmonized protocol for manual segmentation of hippocampal and parahippocampal subregions on high-resolution MRI. In this commentary we discuss the goals for this protocol and the associated key challenges involved in its development. These include differences among existing anatomical reference materials, striking the right balance between reliability of measurements and anatomical validity, and the development of a versatile protocol that can be adopted for the study of populations varying in age and health. The commentary outlines these key challenges, as well as the proposed solution of each, with concrete examples from our working plan. Finally, with two examples, we illustrate how the harmonized protocol, once completed, is expected to impact the field by producing measurements that are quantitatively comparable across labs and by facilitating the synthesis of findings across different studies.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; harmonization; hippocampus; parahippocampal gyrus; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27862600      PMCID: PMC5167633          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  67 in total

1.  Hippocampal subfield volumes at 7T in early Alzheimer's disease and normal aging.

Authors:  Laura E M Wisse; Geert Jan Biessels; Sophie M Heringa; Hugo J Kuijf; Dineke H L Koek; Peter R Luijten; Mirjam I Geerlings
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: evidence of validity.

Authors:  Giovanni B Frisoni; Clifford R Jack; Martina Bocchetta; Corinna Bauer; Kristian S Frederiksen; Yawu Liu; Gregory Preboske; Tim Swihart; Melanie Blair; Enrica Cavedo; Michel J Grothe; Mariangela Lanfredi; Oliver Martinez; Masami Nishikawa; Marileen Portegies; Travis Stoub; Chadwich Ward; Liana G Apostolova; Rossana Ganzola; Dominik Wolf; Frederik Barkhof; George Bartzokis; Charles DeCarli; John G Csernansky; Leyla deToledo-Morrell; Mirjam I Geerlings; Jeffrey Kaye; Ronald J Killiany; Stephane Lehéricy; Hiroshi Matsuda; John O'Brien; Lisa C Silbert; Philip Scheltens; Hilkka Soininen; Stefan Teipel; Gunhild Waldemar; Andreas Fellgiebel; Josephine Barnes; Michael Firbank; Lotte Gerritsen; Wouter Henneman; Nikolai Malykhin; Jens C Pruessner; Lei Wang; Craig Watson; Henrike Wolf; Mony deLeon; Johannes Pantel; Clarissa Ferrari; Paolo Bosco; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Simon Duchesne; Henri Duvernoy; Marina Boccardi
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Congenital absence of the mammillary bodies: a novel finding in a well-studied case of developmental amnesia.

Authors:  R Shayna Rosenbaum; Fuqiang Gao; Kie Honjo; Charles Raybaud; Rosanna K Olsen; Daniela J Palombo; Brian Levine; Sandra E Black
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Roles of human hippocampal subfields in retrieval of spatial and temporal context.

Authors:  Colin T Kyle; Dana N Smuda; Abdul S Hassan; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Ultra-high resolution in-vivo 7.0T structural imaging of the human hippocampus reveals the endfolial pathway.

Authors:  Mansi B Parekh; Brian K Rutt; Ryan Purcell; Yuanxin Chen; Michael M Zeineh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Measurement of hippocampal subfields and age-related changes with high resolution MRI at 4T.

Authors:  S G Mueller; L Stables; A T Du; N Schuff; D Truran; N Cashdollar; M W Weiner
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 7.  Comparative anatomy of the hippocampal dentate gyrus in adult and developing rodents, non-human primates and humans.

Authors:  László Seress
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Investigation of hippocampal substructures in focal temporal lobe epilepsy with and without hippocampal sclerosis at 7T.

Authors:  Brendan G Santyr; Maged Goubran; Jonathan C Lau; Benjamin Y M Kwan; Fateme Salehi; Donald H Lee; Seyed M Mirsattari; Jorge G Burneo; David A Steven; Andrew G Parrent; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Robert R Hammond; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  High-resolution fMRI of content-sensitive subsequent memory responses in human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Alison R Preston; Aaron M Bornstein; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Meghan E Gaare; Gary H Glover; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  54 in total

1.  Recognition Memory Dysfunction Relates to Hippocampal Subfield Volume: A Study of Cognitively Normal and Mildly Impaired Older Adults.

Authors:  Ilana J Bennett; Shauna M Stark; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Hippocampal maturity promotes memory distinctiveness in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Attila Keresztes; Andrew R Bender; Nils C Bodammer; Ulman Lindenberger; Yee Lee Shing; Markus Werkle-Bergner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic architecture of hippocampal subfields on standard resolution MRI: How the parts relate to the whole.

Authors:  Jeremy A Elman; Matthew S Panizzon; Nathan A Gillespie; Donald J Hagler; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Lisa T Eyler; Linda K McEvoy; Michael C Neale; Michael J Lyons; Carol E Franz; Anders M Dale; William S Kremen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Parcellation of the human hippocampus based on gray matter volume covariance: Replicable results on healthy young adults.

Authors:  Ruiyang Ge; Paul Kot; Xiang Liu; Donna J Lang; Jane Z Wang; William G Honer; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Functional Imbalance of Anterolateral Entorhinal Cortex and Hippocampal Dentate/CA3 Underlies Age-Related Object Pattern Separation Deficits.

Authors:  Zachariah M Reagh; Jessica A Noche; Nicholas J Tustison; Derek Delisle; Elizabeth A Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Regionally specific changes in the hippocampal circuitry accompany progression of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Christine L Tardif; Gabriel A Devenyi; Robert S C Amaral; Sandra Pelleieux; Judes Poirier; Pedro Rosa-Neto; John Breitner; M Mallar Chakravarty
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Optimization and validation of automated hippocampal subfield segmentation across the lifespan.

Authors:  Andrew R Bender; Attila Keresztes; Nils C Bodammer; Yee Lee Shing; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Ana M Daugherty; Qijing Yu; Simone Kühn; Ulman Lindenberger; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Characterizing the human hippocampus in aging and Alzheimer's disease using a computational atlas derived from ex vivo MRI and histology.

Authors:  Daniel H Adler; Laura E M Wisse; Ranjit Ittyerah; John B Pluta; Song-Lin Ding; Long Xie; Jiancong Wang; Salmon Kadivar; John L Robinson; Theresa Schuck; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman; John A Detre; Mark A Elliott; Jon B Toledo; Weixia Liu; Stephen Pickup; Michael I Miller; Sandhitsu R Das; David A Wolk; Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Pattern Separation and Source Memory Engage Distinct Hippocampal and Neocortical Regions during Retrieval.

Authors:  Rebecca F Stevenson; Zachariah M Reagh; Amanda P Chun; Elizabeth A Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hippocampal Subfields and Limbic White Matter Jointly Predict Learning Rate in Older Adults.

Authors:  Andrew R Bender; Andreas M Brandmaier; Sandra Düzel; Attila Keresztes; Ofer Pasternak; Ulman Lindenberger; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.