Literature DB >> 35299161

Quantifying stability of parameter estimates forin vivonearly incompressible transversely-isotropic brain MR elastography.

Dhrubo Jyoti1, Matthew McGarry1, Elijah Van Houten2, Damian Sowinski1, Philip V Bayly3, Curtis L Johnson4, Keith Paulsen1,5.   

Abstract

Easily computable quality metrics for measured medical data at point-of-care are important for imaging technologies involving offline reconstruction. Accordingly, we developed a new data quality metric forin vivotransversely-isotropic (TI) magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) based on a generalization of the widely accepted octahedral shear-strain calculation. The metric uses MRE displacement data and an estimate of the TI property field to yield a 'stability map' which predicts regions of low versus high accuracy in the resulting material property reconstructions. We can also calculate an average TI parameter stability (TIPS) score over all voxels in a region of interest for a given measurement to indicate how reliable the recovered mechanical property estimate for the region is expected to be. The calculation is rapid and places little demand on computing resources compared to the computationally intensive material property reconstruction from non-linear inversion (TI-NLI) of displacement fields, making it ideal for point-of-care evaluation of data quality. We test the predictions of the stability map for both simulated phantoms andin vivohuman brain data. We used a range of different displacement datasets from vibrations applied in the anterior-posterior (AP), left-right (LR) and combined AP + LR directions. The TIPS and variability maps (noise sensitivity or variation from the mean of repeated MRE scans) were consistently anti-correlated. Notably, Spearman correlation coefficients ∣R∣>0.6 were found between variability and TIPS score for individual white matter tracts within vivodata. These observations demonstrate the reliability and promise of this data quality metric to screen data rapidly in realistic clinical MRE applications.
© 2022 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR elastography; anisotropy; brain; data quality metric; in vivo; material property reconstruction; octahedral shear strain

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35299161      PMCID: PMC9272913          DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac5ebe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express        ISSN: 2057-1976


  24 in total

1.  In vivo waveguide elastography of white matter tracts in the human brain.

Authors:  Anthony Romano; Michael Scheel; Sebastian Hirsch; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Individual differences in the neurobiology of fluid intelligence predict responsiveness to training: Evidence from a comprehensive cognitive, mindfulness meditation, and aerobic exercise intervention.

Authors:  Ana M Daugherty; Bradley P Sutton; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Trends Neurosci Educ       Date:  2019-11-05

3.  Exercise training effects on memory and hippocampal viscoelasticity in multiple sclerosis: a novel application of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Brian M Sandroff; Curtis L Johnson; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Measurements of mechanical anisotropy in brain tissue and implications for transversely isotropic material models of white matter.

Authors:  Yuan Feng; Ruth J Okamoto; Ravi Namani; Guy M Genin; Philip V Bayly
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-04-17

5.  Relative identifiability of anisotropic properties from magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Renee Miller; Arunark Kolipaka; Martyn P Nash; Alistair A Young
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Requirements for accurate estimation of anisotropic material parameters by magnetic resonance elastography: A computational study.

Authors:  D J Tweten; R J Okamoto; P V Bayly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Regional brain stiffness changes across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

Authors:  Matthew C Murphy; David T Jones; Clifford R Jack; Kevin J Glaser; Matthew L Senjem; Armando Manduca; Joel P Felmlee; Rickey E Carter; Richard L Ehman; John Huston
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Combining viscoelasticity, diffusivity and volume of the hippocampus for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lea M Gerischer; Andreas Fehlner; Theresa Köbe; Kristin Prehn; Daria Antonenko; Ulrike Grittner; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Hippocampal stiffness in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy measured with MR elastography: Preliminary comparison with healthy participants.

Authors:  Graham R Huesmann; Hillary Schwarb; Daniel R Smith; Ryan T Pohlig; Aaron T Anderson; Matthew D J McGarry; Keith D Paulsen; Tracey Mencio Wszalek; Bradley P Sutton; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Standard-space atlas of the viscoelastic properties of the human brain.

Authors:  Lucy V Hiscox; Matthew D J McGarry; Hillary Schwarb; Elijah E W Van Houten; Ryan T Pohlig; Neil Roberts; Graham R Huesmann; Agnieszka Z Burzynska; Bradley P Sutton; Charles H Hillman; Arthur F Kramer; Neal J Cohen; Aron K Barbey; Keith D Paulsen; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.