Literature DB >> 32377936

La définition des moments critiques et non critiques en salle d'opération : une étude de consensus Delphi modifiée.

Sylvain Boet1,2,3, Cole Etherington4,5, Agnes Crnic1, Julie Kenna6, James Jung7,8, Martin Cairns1, Glen Posner9, Teodor Grantcharov7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the operating room (OR) has significantly benefited from aviation strategies to improve safety, the rate of avoidable human errors remains relatively high. One key aviation strategy that has yet to be formally established in the OR is the "sterile cockpit" rule, which prohibits all non-essential behaviours during critical moments of a flight. Applying this rule to the OR may enhance patient safety, but the critical moments of surgery need to be defined first.
METHODS: This study used a modified Delphi methodology to determine critical moments during surgery according to OR team members across institutions, professions, and specialties. Analysis occurred after each round. The stopping criterion was consensus on 80% of survey items or no change in the mean score for any individual item between two consecutive rounds.
RESULTS: The first round included 304 respondents. Of these, 115 completed the second-round survey, and 75 completed all three rounds (27 nurses, 29 anesthesiologists, 19 surgeons). Critical moments obtained by consensus were: induction of anesthesia; emergence from anesthesia; preoperative briefing; final counts at the end of the procedure; anesthesiologist- or surgeon-relevant intraoperative event; handovers; procedure-specific high-risk surgical moments; crisis resource management situations; medication and equipment preparation; and key medication administration.
CONCLUSIONS: By defining the most critical moments of surgery, future research can determine the relative importance of behaviour and actions at each stage and target interventions to these stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32377936     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01688-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  5 in total

1.  Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion.

Authors:  Ralitsa B Akins; Homer Tolson; Bryan R Cole
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Communicating, coordinating, and cooperating when lives depend on it: tips for teamwork.

Authors:  Eduardo Salas; Katherine A Wilson; Carrie E Murphy; Heidi King; Mary Salisbury
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-06

3.  The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies.

Authors:  Marieke Zegers; Martine C de Bruijne; Bertus de Keizer; Hanneke Merten; Peter P Groenewegen; Gerrit van der Wal; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2011-05-20

4.  A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Aveling; Peter McCulloch; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Communication in interdisciplinary teams: exploring closed-loop communication during in situ trauma team training.

Authors:  Maria Härgestam; Marie Lindkvist; Christine Brulin; Maritha Jacobsson; Magnus Hultin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Staff perceptions of the implementation of a trauma video review program at a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Katie N Dainty; M Bianca Seaton; Melissa McGowan; Brodie Nolan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.