| Literature DB >> 32375336 |
Xin Gao1, Tieying Feng1.
Abstract
Due to insufficient financial support and unceasing work, the rural elderly in China experience a range of mental disorders, and the most common one is depression. This study aims to investigate the association between public pension, labor force participation (LFP), and depressive symptoms for older men and women in rural China. A moderated mediation analysis is conducted using data in the 2015 wave extracted from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a continuous national social survey. A total of 2709 available surveys were obtained in our analysis. Using PROCESS, results revealed that the income from China's New Rural Pension Scheme (NRPS) was directly negatively related to depressive symptoms. However, LFP did not mediate the link between pension income (PI) and depressive symptoms in the total study population. The results of moderated mediation estimates indicated that gender significantly moderated the relationship between LFP and depressive symptoms. Specifically, for older women, the indirect effect of PI on depressive symptoms via LFP was significant, but not for the opposite sex. In order to improve the mental health of older adults in rural China, the policy makers and mental health therapists need to pay attention to the aforementioned factors.Entities:
Keywords: depressive symptoms; gender; labor force participation; new rural pension scheme; public pension
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375336 PMCID: PMC7246630 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Conceptual diagram of the moderated mediation analysis. Note: H1—Hypothesis 1; H2—Hypothesis 2; H3—Hypothesis 3.
Figure 2A simple mediation model (Model 4) in the path diagram form.
Figure 3A moderated mediation model (model 14) in the path diagram form.
Description of analytic variables.
| Variables | Total ( | Men ( | Women ( | Men vs. Women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ES | |
| Age | 68.3 | 6.1 | 68.7 | 6.2 | 68.0 | 6.0 | 0.127 |
| Marital Status | 0.122 | ||||||
| Have a life partner ( | 2132 | 78.7 | 1003 | 84.4 | 1129 | 74.3 | |
| Have no spouse ( | 577 | 21.3 | 186 | 15.6 | 391 | 25.7 | |
| Education Years | 3.0 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 0.768 |
| Functional Limitations | 6.9 | 1.9 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 2.0 | −0.095 |
| PI (Ln + 1) | 4.4 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 0.5 | −0.022 ns |
| PI (RMB) | 104.9 | 172.7 | 105.5 | 188.8 | 104.4 | 159.0 | 0.006 ns |
| LFP (Ln + 1) | 3.7 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 0.312 |
| LFP (Hours) | 779.0 | 1159.5 | 967.9 | 1277.3 | 631.3 | 1035.0 | 0.293 |
| Depressive Symptoms | 10.2 | 6.9 | 9.0 | 6.3 | 11.2 | 7.1 | −0.322 |
Note: PI—Pension Income; PI (Ln + 1)—Ln (PI + 1); LFP—Labor Force Participation; LFP (Ln + 1)—Ln (LFP + 1). The results of the Chi-square test (for the categorical variable) and Mann–Whitney U test (for continuous variables) were significant (p < 0.05) except those with superscript ns. ES = effect size estimates (Cramer’s V for categorical variable and Cohen’s d for continuous variables). The interpretations of effect sizes were built on the values: small effect size (Cramer’s V = 0.1/(q − 1)0.5, Cohen’s d = 0.2), medium effect size (Cramer’s V = 0.3/(q − 1)0.5, Cohen’s d = 0.5) and large effect size (Cramer’s V = 0.5/(q−1)0.5, Cohen’s d = 0.8), q is the minimum value between the number of rows and columns [54].
The results of mediation estimates.
| Variables | Unstandardized Coefficients | SE | Standardized Coefficients (β) | t |
| R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome: LFP (ln + 1) | |||||||
| Constant | 17.52 | 0.89 | 19.76 | 0.0000 | 0.1237 | ||
| PI (Ln + 1) | −0.31 | 0.12 | −0.047 | −2.59 | 0.0098 | ||
| Outcome: Depressive Symptoms | |||||||
| Constant | 13.62 | 1.88 | 7.23 | 0.0000 | 0.1252 | ||
| PI (Ln + 1) | −1.30 | 0.24 | −0.098 | −5.41 | 0.0000 | ||
| LFP (Ln + 1) | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.035 | 1.81 | 0.0707 | ||
| Unstandardized Indirect Effect | BootSE | LLCI | ULCI | ||||
| −0.0216 | 0.0157 | −0.0580 | 0.0023 | ||||
Note: PI (Ln + 1)—Ln (PI + 1); LFP—Labor Force Participation; LFP (Ln + 1)—Ln (LFP + 1); LLCI—lower 95% level confidence interval; ULCI—upper 95% level confidence interval.
The results of moderated mediation estimates.
| Variables | Unstandardized Coefficients | SE | Standardized Coefficients (β) | t |
| R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome: LFP (ln + 1) | ||||||
| Constant | 13.80 | 0.89 | 15.56 | 0.0000 | 0.1237 | |
| PI (Ln + 1) | −0.31 | 0.12 | −0.047 | −2.59 | 0.0098 | |
| Outcome: Depressive Symptoms | ||||||
| Constant | 12.56 | 1.84 | 6.82 | 0.0000 | 0.1381 | |
| PI (Ln + 1) | −1.34 | 0.24 | −0.101 | −5.66 | 0.0000 | |
| LFP (Ln + 1) | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.054 | 2.79 | 0.0053 | |
| Gender | 1.61 | 0.27 | 0.117 | 5.92 | 0.0000 | |
| LFP (Ln + 1) *Gender | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.039 | 2.17 | 0.0304 | |
| Index of Moderated Mediation | Index | BootSE | LLCI | ULCI | ||
| −0.0490 | 0.0312 | −0.1210 | −0.0009 | |||
| Conditional Indirect Effects | Gender | Effect | BootSE | LLCI | ULCI | |
| PI—LFP—Depressive Symptoms | Men | −0.0060 | 0.0183 | −0.0456 | 0.0311 | |
| Women | −0.0550 | 0.0276 | −0.1141 | −0.0092 | ||
Note: PI (Ln + 1)—Ln (PI + 1); LFP—Labor Force Participation; LFP (Ln + 1)—Ln (LFP + 1); LLCI—lower 95% level confidence interval; ULCI—upper 95% level confidence interval. The values of moderated mediation index and conditional indirect effects were unstandardized.
Figure 4Conditional effect of gender on the association between LFP and depressive symptoms.