| Literature DB >> 33918363 |
Hui He1, Ling Xu2, Noelle Fields2.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the relations between pensions and depressive symptoms of Chinese older people, and whether intergenerational support mediated such association. Secondary data was drawn from Chinese Longitudinal Aging Social Survey (CLASS) 2014 (N = 6687). Depressive symptoms were measured by 12-item version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D). Intergenerational support was measured by financial, instrumental, and emotional support. About 80.1% of the participants had pension and the mean score of depressive symptoms of the participants was 17.10 (SD = 4.35) with a range from 12 to 36. The results from hierarchical linear regression revealed that there was significantly association between pensions and lower levels of depressive symptoms (B = -0.645, p < 0.000). Findings of mediation analyses also indicated that financial support from adult children played a mediating role between pensions and depressive symptoms (B = -0.039, 95% CI [-0.064, -0.018], z = -3.082, p = 0.002). Findings from this study enrich our theoretical and practical understanding of the roles of intergenerational support, and offer implications for social insurance policy, social work, and family support interventions for Chinese older adults.Entities:
Keywords: CLASS; depressive symptoms; intergenerational support; older adults; pensions
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918363 PMCID: PMC8038253 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Conceptual framework of this study.
Sample Characteristics (N = 6687).
| Variables | Mean (SD) | % | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0 | 68.96 (7.44) | 60–113 | |
| Gender | 0 | |||
| Male | 55.2 | |||
| Female | 44.8 | |||
| Living area | 0 | |||
| Urban | 67.3 | |||
| Rural | 32.7 | |||
| Marital status (being married) | 0.1 | 72.5 | ||
| Live with others (yes) | 0.5 | 87.5 | ||
| Having income (yes) | 0.1 | 19.4 | ||
| Chronic illness (yes) | 0.8 | 70.8 | ||
| Social networks | 17.7 | 15.40 (6.45) | 0–30 | |
| Emotional support | 1.0 | 4.67 (0.83) | 1–5 | |
| Instrumental support | 0.1 | 3.03 (1.64) | 1–5 | |
| Financial support | 4.1 | 4.62 (2.15) | 1–9 | |
| Pension | 1.8 | 80.1 | ||
| Depressive symptoms | 6.2 | 17.10 (4.35) | 12–36 |
Correlations among key variables (N = 6687).
| Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pension | 1 | ||||
| 2. Depressive symptoms | −0.085 ** | 1 | |||
| 3. Emotional support | 0.011 | −0.162 ** | 1 | ||
| 4. Instrumental support | 0.020 | −0.031 ** | 0.136 ** | 1 | |
| 5. Financial support | 0.053 ** | −0.128 ** | 0.087 ** | 0.070 ** | 1 |
** p < 0.01.
Mediating effects of IS in the association between pension insurance and depressive symptoms (N = 6687).
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (c) | (a1_ES) | (a2_IS) | (a3_FS) | (b & c′) | ||||||
| B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | |
| Age | −0.011 | 0.007 | 0.005 *** | 0.002 | 0.021 *** | 0.003 | −0.016 *** | 0.004 | −0.010 | 0.008 |
| Gender (ref = female) | −0.083 | 0.103 | −0.069 ** | 0.022 | −0.016 | 0.041 | −0.050 | 0.055 | −0.193 | 0.105 |
| Living area (ref = rural) | −1.255 *** | 0.110 | −0.084 *** | 0.023 | 0.019 | 0.043 | 0.227 *** | 0.058 | −1.293 *** | 0.111 |
| Marital status | −1.227 *** | 0.135 | 0.021 | 0.028 | −0.840 *** | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.072 | −1.177 *** | 0.139 |
| Income (yes) | −0.604 *** | 0.135 | 0.037 | 0.028 | −0.075 | 0.053 | −0.301 *** | 0.072 | −0.612 *** | 0.136 |
| Chronic illness (yes) | 1.539 *** | 0.109 | −0.076 ** | 0.023 | 0.047 | 0.043 | 0.045 | 0.059 | 1.489 *** | 0.111 |
| Social networks | −0.137 *** | 0.008 | 0.014 *** | 0.002 | 0.034 *** | 0.003 | 0.034 *** | 0.004 | −0.122 *** | 0.008 |
| Live with others | −1.21 *** | 0.171 | 0.088 ** | 0.036 | 1.194 *** | 0.068 | 0.151 | 0.092 | −1.136 *** | 0.178 |
| Pension | −0.645 *** | 0.129 | 0.034 | 0.027 | −0.131 * | 0.050 | 0.237 *** | 0.068 | −0.534 *** | 0.130 |
| Emotional support | −0.682 *** | 0.060 | ||||||||
| Instrumental support | −0.002 | 0.032 | ||||||||
| Financial support | −0.165 *** | 0.024 | ||||||||
| Constant | 22.374 *** | 4.121 *** | 0.694 *** | 4.791 *** | 25.937 *** | |||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.143 | 0.019 | 0.095 | 0.024 | 0.167 | |||||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Notes: Independent variable; pension; Dependent variable; depressive symptoms; In model 1, pension is the predictor, depressive symptoms is the outcome; In model 2, pension is the predictor and intergenerational support is the outcome (a1 for emotional support (ES), a2 for instrumental support (IS), and a3 for financial support (FS)); In model 3, pension is the predictor, intergenerational support is the mediator, and depressive symptoms is the outcome.