Literature DB >> 35687196

Precision medicine using patient-specific modelling: state of the art and perspectives in dental practice.

Pierre Lahoud1,2,3, Reinhilde Jacobs1,2,4, Philippe Boisse5, Mostafa EzEldeen1,2,6, Maxime Ducret7,8,9, Raphael Richert10,11,12.   

Abstract

The dental practice has largely evolved in the last 50 years following a better understanding of the biomechanical behaviour of teeth and its supporting structures, as well as developments in the fields of imaging and biomaterials. However, many patients still encounter treatment failures; this is related to the complex nature of evaluating the biomechanical aspects of each clinical situation due to the numerous patient-specific parameters, such as occlusion and root anatomy. In parallel, the advent of cone beam computed tomography enabled researchers in the field of odontology as well as clinicians to gather and model patient data with sufficient accuracy using image processing and finite element technologies. These developments gave rise to a new precision medicine concept that proposes to individually assess anatomical and biomechanical characteristics and adapt treatment options accordingly. While this approach is already applied in maxillofacial surgery, its implementation in dentistry is still restricted. However, recent advancements in artificial intelligence make it possible to automate several parts of the laborious modelling task, bringing such user-assisted decision-support tools closer to both clinicians and researchers. Therefore, the present narrative review aimed to present and discuss the current literature investigating patient-specific modelling in dentistry, its state-of-the-art applications, and research perspectives.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Dental stress analysis; Finite element analysis; Oral diagnosis; Patient-specific modelling; Precision medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35687196     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04572-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.606


  66 in total

1.  Stress distribution with different restorations in teeth with curved roots: a finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Chayanee Chatvanitkul; Veera Lertchirakarn
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Roy Kerckhoffs
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  Prevalence of vertical root fracture as the reason for tooth extraction in dental clinics.

Authors:  Koichi Yoshino; Koji Ito; Masahiko Kuroda; Naoki Sugihara
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of occlusal loading conditions in a lower second premolar using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Ian R Grosse; Giorgio Gruppioni; Gerhard W Weber; Ottmar Kullmer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Evidence based dental care: integrating clinical expertise with systematic research.

Authors:  Mallika Kishore; Sunil R Panat; Ashish Aggarwal; Nupur Agarwal; Nitin Upadhyay; Abhijeet Alok
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  Recommended treatment of cracked teeth: Results from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Thomas J Hilton; Ellen Funkhouser; Jack L Ferracane; Michele Schultz-Robins; Valeria V Gordan; Bobby J Bramblett; R Mack Snead; Walter Manning; Jeffrey R Remakel
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 7.  Patient-specific bone modeling and analysis: the role of integration and automation in clinical adoption.

Authors:  Amir A Zadpoor; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Vertical root fracture in upper premolars with endodontic posts: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Andrea F V Santos; Carina B Tanaka; Raul G Lima; Camila O M Espósito; Rafael Y Ballester; Roberto R Braga; Josete B C Meira
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Is There a Difference in Cost Between Standard and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery?

Authors:  Cory M Resnick; Gino Inverso; Mariusz Wrzosek; Bonnie L Padwa; Leonard B Kaban; Zachary S Peacock
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 10.  A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study the load capacity and clinical behaviour of the root filled teeth.

Authors:  Ronald Ordinola-Zapata; Fei Lin; Sanket Nagarkar; Jorge Perdigão
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.165

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multifactorial Analysis of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Finite Element Models.

Authors:  Raphael Richert; Jean-Christophe Farges; Jean-Christophe Maurin; Jérôme Molimard; Philippe Boisse; Maxime Ducret
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.