| Literature DB >> 32372247 |
Katarzyna Brzeźniakiewicz-Janus1, Joanna Rupa-Matysek2, Andrzej Tukiendorf3, Tomasz Janus4, Mirosław Franków5, Marcus Daniel Lancé6, Lidia Gil2.
Abstract
This study presents the statistical results of patients who had been recently discharged from hospital within one month after their treatment in the emergency department (ED). Using routine (14,881) MCV and RDW measurements and statistical tools, we could predict acute mortality in these patients (N = 1158), adjusted for age. It is likely that an increase in the MCV and RDW parameters may correlate in some of our older patients with a poor prognosis with an increased level of circulating IGF-I, which affects red blood cell parameters. The research presents the prognostic statistics of the analyzed clinical factors as well as speculates on the potential correlation of these parameters with the regenerative potential of stem-cell compartment. Analysis shows that both MCV and RDW are statistically significant (Area Under Curve [AUC], lower CI 95% >50%) predictors of acute mortality in ED patients. The classification of patients based on their MCV threshold (= 92.2 units) indicates a proper clinical prognosis in nearly 6 of 10 subjects (AUC >58%), whereas taking into account RDW (=13.8%) indicates a proper clinical prognosis in no more than 7 of 10 individuals. The report concludes that by employing strongly fitting (95%) quadratic modeling of the ORs against the biomarkers studied, one can notice a similar relationship between MCV and RDW as diagnostic tools to predict regenerative potential and clinical outcomes in older patients. Although RDW alone had a 10% higher diagnostic value in terms of predicting early death in the emergency department in patients that were admitted to the ED and subsequently hospitalized, also taking the MCV measurement improved accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes by 2.5% compared to RDW alone.Entities:
Keywords: Acute mortality; GH; IGF-I; MCV; Mean corpuscular volume; RDV; Red blood distribution width; VSELs
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32372247 PMCID: PMC7392927 DOI: 10.1007/s12015-020-09977-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep ISSN: 2629-3277 Impact factor: 5.739
Main descriptive statistics of ED patients according to sex and ICD10 classes of the first diagnoses
| Sex: | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICD–10 class | # of diagnoses | # of deaths(%) | Age ± st. dev. | # of diagnoses | # of deaths(%) | Age ± st. dev. |
| gastroenterological | 804 | 37(5%) | 55.9 ± 17.4 | 624 | 39(6%) | 61.5 ± 20.2 |
| infections (virus, bacterial, fungal) | 33 | 0(0%) | 52.1 ± 17.0 | 31 | 2(6%) | 60.7 ± 22.6 |
| cardiological | 3513 | 359(10%) | 65.2 ± 13.4 | 3049 | 343(11%) | 72.8 ± 13.6 |
| metabolic | 283 | 12(4%) | 62.2 ± 18.0 | 311 | 32(10%) | 71.9 ± 17.4 |
| urogenital | 484 | 18(4%) | 56.0 ± 19.0 | 421 | 28(7%) | 59.9 ± 21.4 |
| neurological | 565 | 5(1%) | 52.7 ± 17.0 | 422 | 7(2%) | 57.4 ± 19.5 |
| chronic haematopoietic diseases | 116 | 12(10%) | 67.2 ± 16.2 | 189 | 20(11%) | 71.8 ± 18.0 |
| ophtalamic and laryngological | 105 | 1(1%) | 58.0 ± 16.9 | 160 | 0(0%) | 61.8 ± 17.1 |
| cancer | 337 | 62(18%) | 65.0 ± 12.8 | 277 | 56(20%) | 66.2 ± 13.0 |
| psychiatric | 278 | 1(0%) | 46.5 ± 18.2 | 143 | 0(0%) | 52.3 ± 22.1 |
| pulmonary | 632 | 70(11%) | 65.5 ± 17.2 | 534 | 50(9%) | 70.6 ± 18.0 |
| orthopedic | 139 | 1(1%) | 53.0 ± 17.4 | 187 | 0(0%) | 59.6 ± 20.3 |
| dermatological | 47 | 2(4%) | 54.6 ± 18.3 | 39 | 1(3%) | 53.4 ± 20.1 |
| n= | 7336 | 580 | 6387 | 578 | ||
Odds ratios (ORs) MCV and RDW categories (adjusted by age) of acute mortality (until 1 month since the visit) in ED patients aged ≥18 with 95% confidence intervals and p values (multivariate logistic regression)
| Risk factor | Level | Mortality | OR | CI95% | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ≥18 | – | 1.035 | (1.031,1.038) | <0.0001 |
| MCV [fL] | <80 | 8.6% | 1.00 | (ref.) | – |
| 75–79.9 | 6.7% | 1.14 | (0.94,1.40) | 0.1839 | |
| 80–84.9 | 5.6% | 1.39 | (1.15,1.67) | 0.0006 | |
| 85–89.9 | 6.5% | 1.42 | (1.17,1.72) | 0.0003 | |
| 90–94.9 | 8.0% | 2.17 | (1.75,2.70) | <0.0001 | |
| ≥95 | 19.1% | 2.60 | (2.05,3.29) | <0.0001 | |
| RDW [%] | <13 | 3.0% | 1 | (ref.) | – |
| 13.0–13.4 | 4.8% | 1.22 | (1.03,1.43) | 0.0174 | |
| 13.5–13.9 | 7.9% | 1.61 | (1.36,1.90) | <0.0001 | |
| 14.0–14.4 | 7.6% | 1.46 | (1.21,1.76) | 0.0001 | |
| 14.5–14.9 | 11.4% | 1.99 | (1.67,2.38) | <0.0001 | |
| 15.0–15.4 | 13.2% | 2.43 | (1.97,3.00) | <0.0001 | |
| ≥15.5 | 19.2% | 3.47 | (2.99,4.03) | <0.0001 |
Fig. 1Model of acute mortality risk (until one month post-visit) in ED patients aged ≥18 (with frequency bars)
Fig. 2ORs for MCV categories (with quadratic approximation)
Fig. 3ORs for RDW categories (with quadratic approximation)
Quadratic approximations of ORs (Table 1.)
| Biomarker | Regression parameter | Mean | CI95% | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCV [fL] | Intercept | 0.92 | (0.75,1.09) | 0.0004 | 0.9637 |
| x2 | 0.05 | (0.04,0.06) | 0.0005 | ||
| RDW [%] | Intercept | 0.95 | (0.70,1.20) | 0.0007 | 0.9473 |
| x2 | 0.05 | (0.04,0.06) | 0.0002 |
Prognostic values of age and MCV following ROC analysis
| Risk factor | Threshold | Specificity [%] | Sensitivity [%] | AUC [%](CI 95%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCV [fL] | 92.2 | 81.1 | 34.6 | 58.2(56.3–60.2) |
| RDW [%] | 13.8 | 59.4 | 69.4 | 69.2(67.5–70.7) |
Fig. 4ROC curves with prognostic statistics of acute death of ED patients
Fig. 5MCV, RDW, and MCV + RDW ROC curves (with a comparison test for RDW and MCV + RDW characteristics)