BACKGROUND: Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a quantitative measure of variability in the size of circulating erythrocytes with higher values reflecting greater heterogeneity in cell sizes. Recent studies have shown that higher RDW is associated with increased mortality risk in patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whether RDW is prognostic in more representative community-based populations is unclear. METHODS: Seven relevant community-based studies of older adults with RDW measurement and mortality ascertainment were identified. Cox proportional hazards regression and meta-analysis on individual participant data were performed. RESULTS: Median RDW values varied across studies from 13.2% to 14.6%. During 68,822 person-years of follow-up of 11,827 older adults with RDW measured, there was a graded increased risk of death associated with higher RDW values (p < .001). For every 1% increment in RDW, total mortality risk increased by 14% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.17). In addition, RDW was strongly associated with deaths from CVD (adjusted HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.12-1.25), cancer (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), and other causes (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.18). Furthermore, the RDW-mortality association occurred in all major demographic, disease, and nutritional risk factor subgroups examined. Among the subset of 1,603 older adults without major age-associated diseases, RDW remained strongly associated with total mortality (adjusted HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.21-1.44). CONCLUSIONS: RDW is a routinely reported test that is a powerful predictor of mortality in community-dwelling older adults with and without age-associated diseases. The biologic mechanisms underlying this association merit investigation.
BACKGROUND: Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a quantitative measure of variability in the size of circulating erythrocytes with higher values reflecting greater heterogeneity in cell sizes. Recent studies have shown that higher RDW is associated with increased mortality risk in patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whether RDW is prognostic in more representative community-based populations is unclear. METHODS: Seven relevant community-based studies of older adults with RDW measurement and mortality ascertainment were identified. Cox proportional hazards regression and meta-analysis on individual participant data were performed. RESULTS: Median RDW values varied across studies from 13.2% to 14.6%. During 68,822 person-years of follow-up of 11,827 older adults with RDW measured, there was a graded increased risk of death associated with higher RDW values (p < .001). For every 1% increment in RDW, total mortality risk increased by 14% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.17). In addition, RDW was strongly associated with deaths from CVD (adjusted HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.12-1.25), cancer (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), and other causes (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.18). Furthermore, the RDW-mortality association occurred in all major demographic, disease, and nutritional risk factor subgroups examined. Among the subset of 1,603 older adults without major age-associated diseases, RDW remained strongly associated with total mortality (adjusted HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.21-1.44). CONCLUSIONS: RDW is a routinely reported test that is a powerful predictor of mortality in community-dwelling older adults with and without age-associated diseases. The biologic mechanisms underlying this association merit investigation.
Authors: Brydon J B Grant; Deepa P Kudalkar; Paola Muti; Susan E McCann; Maurizio Trevisan; Jo L Freudenheim; Holger J Schünemann Journal: Chest Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Richard C Woodman; Stefania Bandinelli; Fulvio Lauretani; Anna Maria Corsi; Paulo H M Chaves; William B Ershler; Dan L Longo Journal: Am J Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Kushang V Patel; Dan L Longo; William B Ershler; Binbing Yu; Richard D Semba; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: David de Gonzalo-Calvo; Benjamín Fernández-García; Beatriz de Luxán-Delgado; Susana Rodríguez-González; Marina García-Macia; Francisco Manuel Suárez; Juan José Solano; María Josefa Rodríguez-Colunga; Ana Coto-Montes Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2012-01-04
Authors: Richard D Semba; Kushang V Patel; Luigi Ferrucci; Kai Sun; Cindy N Roy; Jack M Guralnik; Linda P Fried Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Suely Meireles Rezende; Willem M Lijfering; Frits R Rosendaal; Suzanne C Cannegieter Journal: Haematologica Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 9.941