Literature DB >> 32369604

Internationalization of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology.

Costanza Rovida1, Tara Barton-Maclaren2, Emilio Benfenati3, Francesca Caloni4, P. Charukeshi Chandrasekera5, Christophe Chesné6, Mark T D Cronin7, Joop De Knecht8, Daniel R Dietrich9, Sylvia E Escher10, Suzanne Fitzpatrick11, Brenna Flannery11, Matthias Herzler12, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou13, Bruno Hubesch14, Hennicke Kamp15, Jaffar Kisitu16, Nicole Kleinstreuer17, Simona Kovarich18, Marcel Leist1,16, Alexandra Maertens19, Kerry Nugent20, Giorgia Pallocca1, Manuel Pastor21, Grace Patlewicz22, Manuela Pavan23, Octavio Presgrave24, Lena Smirnova19, Michael Schwarz25, Takashi Yamada26, Thomas Hartung1,19.   

Abstract

Read-across (RAx) translates available information from well-characterized chemicals to a substance for which there is a toxicological data gap. The OECD is working on case studies to probe general applicability of RAx, and several regulations (e.g., EU-REACH) already allow this procedure to be used to waive new in vivo tests. The decision to prepare a review on the state of the art of RAx as a tool for risk assessment for regulatory purposes was taken during a workshop with international experts in Ranco, Italy in July 2018. Three major issues were identified that need optimization to allow a higher regulatory acceptance rate of the RAx procedure: (i) the definition of similarity of source and target, (ii) the translation of biological/toxicological activity of source to target in the RAx procedure, and (iii) how to deal with issues of ADME that may differ between source and target. The use of new approach methodologies (NAM) was discussed as one of the most important innovations to improve the acceptability of RAx. At present, NAM data may be used to confirm chemical and toxicological similarity. In the future, the use of NAM may be broadened to fully characterize the hazard and toxicokinetic properties of RAx compounds. Concerning available guidance, documents on Good Read-Across Practice (GRAP) and on best practices to perform and evaluate the RAx process were identified. Here, in particular, the RAx guidance, being worked out by the European Commission’s H2020 project EU-ToxRisk together with many external partners with regulatory experience, is given.

Entities:  

Keywords:  new approach method; read-across; regulatory toxicology; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32369604      PMCID: PMC9201788          DOI: 10.14573/altex.1912181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.250


  88 in total

1.  Food for thought ... why no new in vitro tests will be done for REACH by registrants.

Authors:  Costanza Rovida
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  An evaluation of global QSAR models for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Authors:  S J Enoch; M T D Cronin; T W Schultz; J C Madden
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 3.  Using chemical categories to fill data gaps in hazard assessment.

Authors:  K van Leeuwen; T W Schultz; T Henry; B Diderich; G D Veith
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals.

Authors:  Simon John More; Vasileios Bampidis; Diane Benford; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Claude Bragard; Thorhallur Ingi Halldorsson; Antonio F Hernández-Jerez; Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Hanspeter Naegeli; Josef R Schlatter; Vittorio Silano; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Dieter Schrenk; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Emilio Benfenati; Laurence Castle; Nina Cedergreen; Anthony Hardy; Ryszard Laskowski; Jean Charles Leblanc; Andreas Kortenkamp; Ad Ragas; Leo Posthuma; Claus Svendsen; Roland Solecki; Emanuela Testai; Bruno Dujardin; George En Kass; Paola Manini; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Jean-Lou Cm Dorne; Christer Hogstrand
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2019-03-25

6.  Evidence-based absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) and its interplay with alternative toxicity methods.

Authors:  Katya Tsaioun; Bas J Blaauboer; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.043

7.  A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty.

Authors:  Karen Blackburn; Sharon B Stuard
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Predicting estrogen receptor activation by a group of substituted phenols: An integrated approach to testing and assessment case study.

Authors:  Francina Webster; Matthew Gagné; Grace Patlewicz; Prachi Pradeep; Nicholas Trefiak; Richard S Judson; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Aligning nanotoxicology with the 3Rs: What is needed to realise the short, medium and long-term opportunities?

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Karin Aschberger; Qasim Chaudhry; Martin J D Clift; Paul Fowler; Helinor Johnston; Robert Landsiedel; Joanna Rowland; Vicki Stone; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments.

Authors:  Diane Benford; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Michael John Jeger; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Simon More; Hanspeter Naegeli; Hubert Noteborn; Colin Ockleford; Antonia Ricci; Guido Rychen; Josef R Schlatter; Vittorio Silano; Roland Solecki; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Peter Craig; Andrew Hart; Natalie Von Goetz; Kostas Koutsoumanis; Alicja Mortensen; Bernadette Ossendorp; Laura Martino; Caroline Merten; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Anthony Hardy
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2018-01-24
View more
  14 in total

1.  Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization.

Authors:  James P McCord; Louis C Groff; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Comparing the performance and coverage of selected in silico (liver) metabolism tools relative to reported studies in the literature to inform analogue selection in read-across: A case study.

Authors:  Matthew Boyce; Brian Meyer; Chris Grulke; Lucina Lizarraga; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Generalised Read-Across prediction using genra-py.

Authors:  Imran Shah; Tia Tate; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 6.931

4.  Evolving Science and Practice of Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Pamela R D Williams
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  25th anniversary of the Berlin workshop on developmental toxicology: DevTox database update, challenges in risk assessment of developmental neurotoxicity and alternative methodologies in bone development and growth.

Authors:  Philip Marx-Stoelting; Marize de L M Solano; Hiroaki Aoyama; Ralf H Adams; Anna Bal-Price; Jochen Buschmann; Ibrahim Chahoud; Ruth Clark; Tian Fang; Michio Fujiwara; Michael Gelinsky; Konstanze Grote; Masao Horimoto; Susanne Hougaard Bennekou; Rupert Kellner; Makiko Kuwagata; Marcel Leist; Annemarie Lang; Weihua Li; Alberto Mantovani; Susan L Makris; Francisco Paumgartten; Monique Perron; Magdalini Sachana; Anne Schmitt; Steffen Schneider; Gilbert Schönfelder; Frank Schulze; Kohei Shiota; Roland Solecki
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Setting the stage for next-generation risk assessment with non-animal approaches: the EU-ToxRisk project experience.

Authors:  M J Moné; G Pallocca; S E Escher; T Exner; M Herzler; S Hougaard Bennekou; H Kamp; E D Kroese; Marcel Leist; T Steger-Hartmann; B van de Water
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Flame: an open source framework for model development, hosting, and usage in production environments.

Authors:  Manuel Pastor; José Carlos Gómez-Tamayo; Ferran Sanz
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  Acute effects of the imidacloprid metabolite desnitro-imidacloprid on human nACh receptors relevant for neuronal signaling.

Authors:  Udo Kraushaar; Marcel Leist; Dominik Loser; Karin Grillberger; Maria G Hinojosa; Jonathan Blum; Yves Haufe; Timm Danker; Ylva Johansson; Clemens Möller; Annette Nicke; Susanne H Bennekou; Iain Gardner; Caroline Bauch; Paul Walker; Anna Forsby; Gerhard F Ecker
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Collection of Controlled Nanosafety Data-The CoCoN-Database, a Tool to Assess Nanomaterial Hazard.

Authors:  Harald F Krug
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Investigating Molecular Mechanisms of Immunotoxicity and the Utility of ToxCast for Immunotoxicity Screening of Chemicals Added to Food.

Authors:  Olga V Naidenko; David Q Andrews; Alexis M Temkin; Tasha Stoiber; Uloma Igara Uche; Sydney Evans; Sean Perrone-Gray
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.