Literature DB >> 32367173

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer as a platform to build on: review of current evidence.

Pietro Achilli1, Fabian Grass2, David W Larson2.   

Abstract

Laparoscopy in colorectal surgery reduces the rate of postoperative complications, shortens the length of stay in hospital, and improves the quality of patient care. Despite these established benefits, the technical challenges of rectal resection for cancer have resulted in most operations being performed through open surgery in the USA. Moreover, controversy in the current literature questions the oncologic safety of a laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer. How then can surgeons innovate to overcome the technical challenges while preserving the critical oncological outcomes of high-quality rectal cancer surgery? Robotics may be a platform that allows us to overcome the technical challenges in the pelvis while maintaining both oncological outcomes and the benefits of a minimally invasive technique. Current evidence suggests that the quality of total mesorectal excision, the rates of circumferential margin involvement, and postoperative outcomes are comparable between robotic and laparoscopic surgery. While a robotic approach demonstrates lower conversion rates and reduced surgeon workload, the operative time is longer and initial costs are higher; however, time and future science will determine its true benefits. We review the current state of robotic surgery and its impact on rectal cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Rectal cancer; Robotic platform; Robotic surgery; Total mesorectal excision

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32367173     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02008-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  50 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Kellie L Mathis; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Diffusion of technology: Trends in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Aneel Damle; Rachelle N Damle; Julie M Flahive; Andrew T Schlussel; Jennifer S Davids; Paul R Sturrock; Justin A Maykel; Karim Alavi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; Mercedes Rubio-Dorado-Manzanares; José Manuel Díaz-Pavón; M Luisa Reyes-Díaz; Jorge Manuel Vazquez-Monchul; Ana M Garcia-Cabrera; Javier Padillo; Fernando De la Portilla
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  David W Larson; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Sexual function, body image, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  David W Larson; Michael M Davies; Eric J Dozois; Robert R Cima; Karen Piotrowicz; Kari Anderson; Sunni A Barnes; W Scott Harmsen; Tonia M Young-Fadok; Bruce G Wolff; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung-Yong Jeong; Ji Won Park; Byung Ho Nam; Sohee Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Tae-You Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang; Eui Kyu Chie; Sun Young Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  B L Green; H C Marshall; F Collinson; P Quirke; P Guillou; D G Jayne; J M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].

Authors:  Carolin Kastner; Joachim Reibetanz; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sakshi Bramhe; Swanand S Pathak
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 3.  The Role of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Rectal Cancer Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Elena Belloni; Edoardo Maria Muttillo; Salomone Di Saverio; Marcello Gasparrini; Antonio Brescia; Giuseppe Nigri
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion potentiates the risk for pathological metastasis to the lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Atsushi Hamabe; Masayuki Ishii; Koichi Onodera; Kenji Okita; Toshihiko Nishidate; Koichi Okuya; Emi Akizuki; Ryo Miura; Takahiro Korai; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Ichiro Takemasa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Comparison of Non-Oncological Postoperative Outcomes Following Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Colorectal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chetna Ravindra; Emmanuelar O Igweonu-Nwakile; Safina Ali; Salomi Paul; Shreyas Yakkali; Sneha Teresa Selvin; Sonu Thomas; Viktoriya Bikeyeva; Ahmed Abdullah; Aleksandra Radivojevic; Anas A Abu Jad; Anvesh Ravanavena; Prachi Balani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.