| Literature DB >> 32366276 |
Jacek Sroka1, Jacek Karamon2, Angelina Wójcik-Fatla3, Weronika Piotrowska2, Jacek Dutkiewicz3, Ewa Bilska-Zając2, Violetta Zając3, Maciej Kochanowski2, Joanna Dąbrowska2, Tomasz Cencek2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma gondii infection may pose a severe medical problem especially in a congenital form and as an acquired infection in immunocompromised persons. Raw and undercooked meat of slaughtered animals is regarded as an important source of parasite infection; however, data concerning this issue in Poland are still insufficient. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of T. gondii infection in pigs and cattle slaughtered for human consumption in Poland using serological and molecular methods.Entities:
Keywords: Cattle; Meat; PCR; Pigs; Poland; Seroprevalence; Toxoplasma gondii
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32366276 PMCID: PMC7199313 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04106-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1The numbers of examined pigs and cattle from individual regions (voivodeships) in Poland
Results of direct agglutination test (DAT) for Toxoplasma gondii in pigs in Poland
| Region | Seroprevalence (%) | 95% CI | Titre range (%)a | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40–60 | 180–540 | 1620–4000 | 6000 | 18000 | ||||
| Dolnośląskie | 29/150 | 19.3* | 13.8–26.4 | 14.0 | 5.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kujawsko-Pomorskie | 39/300 | 13.0 | 9.7–17.3 | 8.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 0.3 |
| Lubelskie | 19/210 | 9.1 | 5.9–13.7 | 7.1 | 0 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 |
| Lubuskie | 10/182 | 5.5 | 3.0–9.8 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Łódzkie | 15/168 | 8.9 | 5.5–14.2 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 0 | 0 |
| Małopolskie | 21/200 | 10.5 | 7.0–15.5 | 9.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Mazowieckie | 32/206 | 15.5 | 11.2–21.1 | 13.6 | 0 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 |
| Opolskie | 51/288 | 17.7* | 13.7–22.5 | 14.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Podkarpackie | 46/141 | 32.6* | 25.4–40.7 | 21.3 | 0 | 11.3 | 0 | 0 |
| Podlaskie | 35/165 | 21.2* | 15.7–28.1 | 10.9 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 0 |
| Pomorskie | 1/105 | 1.0 | 0.2–5.2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Świętokrzyskie | 8/210 | 3.8 | 1.9–7.3 | 0.5 | 0 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 0 |
| Śląskie | 21/201 | 10.5 | 6.9–15.4 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Warmińsko-Mazurskie | 12/167 | 7.2 | 4.2–12.1 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Wielkopolskie | 10/218 | 4.6 | 2.5–8.2 | 4.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 |
| Zachodniopomorskie | 20/200 | 10.0 | 6.6–14.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Total | 369/3111 | 11.9 | 10.8–13.0 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
aPercent value in relation to the total number of animals examined in a given region
*Significant differences in percentages of positive results in comparison with other regions of Poland (P < 0.05)
Abbreviations: n, number of seropositive animals; N, number of animals tested; CI, confidence interval
Results of direct agglutination test (DAT) for Toxoplasma gondii in cattle in Poland
| Region | Seroprevalence (%) | 95% CI | Titre range (%)a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40–60 | 180–540 | 1620–4000 | ≥ 6000 | ||||
| Dolnośląskie | 5/50 | 10.0 | 4.4–21.4 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kujawsko-Pomorskie | 9/134 | 6.7 | 3.6–12.3 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0 |
| Lubelskie | 21/115 | 18.3 | 12.3–26.3 | 18.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Łódzkie | 13/150 | 8.7 | 5.1–14.3 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0 |
| Małopolskie | 11/156 | 7.1 | 4.0–12.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Mazowieckie | 54/121 | 44.6* | 36.1–53.5 | 30.6 | 14.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Opolskie | 0/21 | 0 | 0.0–15.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Podkarpackie | 13/160 | 8.1 | 4.8–13.4 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 0 | 0 |
| Podlaskie | 39/139 | 28.1* | 21.3–36.0 | 20.1 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 0 |
| Pomorskie | 14/195 | 7.2 | 4.3–11.7 | 5.6 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Świętokrzyskie | 7/200 | 3.5 | 1.7–7.1 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Śląskie | 61/299 | 20.4* | 16.2–25.3 | 17.1 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0 |
| Warmińsko-Mazurskie | 34/125 | 27.2* | 20.2–35.6 | 23.2 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0 |
| Wielkopolskie | 25/399 | 6.3 | 4.3–9.1 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0 |
| Zachodniopomorskie | 7/147 | 4.8 | 2.3–9.5 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 313/2411 | 13.0 | 11.7–14.4 | 9.7 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0 |
aPercent value in relation to the total number of animals examined in a given region
*Significant differences in percentages of positive results in comparison with other regions of Poland (P < 0.05)
Abbreviations: n, number of seropositive animals; N, number of animals tested; CI, confidence interval
Toxoplasma gondii genotypes detected in tissues of pigs slaughtered in different regions of Poland
| DNA sample ID | Locality | Results of | Possible genotype (ToxoDB)c | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAG1a | SAG2 (3’ and/or 5’) | altSAG2 | SAG3 | BTUB | GRA6 | c22-8 | c29-2 | Apico | L358 | PK1 | |||
| 1 | LS | II/III | II | II | II | II | II | II | II | I | II | na | #3 |
| 2 | LS | II/III | II | II | II | II | II | II | na | I | na | II | #3 |
| 3 | PK | II/III | II | II | II | II | II | na | II | I | na | na | #3 |
| 4 | PK | II/III | II | na | II | II | II | na | II | I | na | na | #3 |
| 5 | PK | na | na | na | II | na | II | na | na | I | na | na | nd |
| 6 | SL | na | na | na | II | na | II | na | na | I | na | na | nd |
| 7 | SL | na | na | II | na | na | na | na | na | I | na | na | nd |
| 8 | PK | na | na | na | II | na | na | na | na | na | na | na | nd |
| 9 | LD | na | na | na | na | na | na | na | na | II | na | na | nd |
| 10 | SL | na | II | na | na | na | I | na | na | na | na | na | nd |
| 11 | SL | I | I | I | I | na | I | I | na | I | na | na | #10 or #27 |
| 12 | SL | na | I | na | na | na | na | na | na | I | na | na | nd |
| 13 | SL | na | I/IIIb | na | na | na | na | na | na | I | na | na | nd |
| 14 | LS | na | na | na | na | na | na | na | na | I | na | na | nd |
aAt the SAG1 locus, types II and III are indistinguishable
bOnly the 3’ SAG2 locus was determined, types I and III were indistinguishable
cAvailable at: https://toxodb.org/toxo/
Abbreviations: LS, Lubuskie region; PK, Podkarpackie region; SL, Śląskie region; LD, Łódzkie region; na, product not amplified; nd, not determined
Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity in pigs and cattle from Poland in relation to age, sex, farm size and rearing category
| Parameter | Species | No. of animals (% seropositive) | Odds ratio | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group (years) | Cattle | ≤ 1a | 217 (9.2) | 1 | ||
| > 1–2 | 1241 (10.6) | 1.18 | 0.70–2.01 | 0.534 | ||
| > 2–5 | 446 (15.2) | 1.65 | 0.93–2.93 | 0.087 | ||
| > 5–10 | 297 (21.5) | 2.42 | 1.33–4.40 | 0.004 | ||
| > 10 | 133 (17.3) | 1.71 | 0.83–3.53 | 0.147 | ||
| Sex | Pigs | Malea | 1054 (11.3) | 1 | ||
| Female | 1261 (12.5) | 0.73 | 0.43–1.24 | 0.247 | ||
| Cattle | Malea | 1128 (11.3) | 1 | |||
| Female | 1009 (16.7) | 1.18 | 0.85–1.64 | 0.323 | ||
| Farm size | Pigs | Small (≤ 30 animals) | 1885 (16.6) | 3.89 | 2.04–7.40 | < 0.0001 |
| Large (> 30 animals)a | 561 (6.6) | 1 | ||||
| Cattle | Small | 1566 (16.3) | 2.92 | 1.46–5.84 | 0.003 | |
| Largea | 164 (5.5) | 1 | ||||
| Rearing category | Fattening pigs | Open production system farms | 690 (7.8) | 2.67 | 1.42–5.02 | 0.002 |
| Closed production system farmsa | 323 (6.5) | 1 |
aReference group in analysis
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval