| Literature DB >> 30407082 |
Jacek Sroka1, Ewa Bilska-Zając1, Angelina Wójcik-Fatla2, Violetta Zając2, Jacek Dutkiewicz2, Jacek Karamon1, Weronika Piotrowska1, Tomasz Cencek1.
Abstract
Raw and undercooked meat are regarded as important sources of Toxoplasma gondii infection of people in Europe; however, data concerning this issue in Poland are still insufficient. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of T. gondii DNA isolated from raw meat products retailed in Poland. The molecular characteristics of detected DNA were also performed. Samples of cured bacon, raw or smoked sausages, ham, and minced meat were examined for the presence of T. gondii DNA. Samples were digested by pepsin solution, followed by the DNA isolation. Nested and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed based on the amplification of 35-fold-repetitive B1 fragment gene of T. gondii. For selected B1-positive samples, multiplex PCR was performed using SAG1, SAG2 (5'-SAG2 and 3'-SAG2), altSAG2, SAG3, GRA6, BTUB, C29-2, and L358 genetic markers. Amplicons were sequenced and analyzed with NCBI database. Among 3223 examined samples, 175 (5.4%) were PCR positive. The highest percentages of positive results were found for samples originating from south-east regions of Poland-Podkarpackie (17.9%), Małopolskie (12.6%), and Lubelskie (10.8%) (p < 0.001). The percentages of positive results for particular types of meat products-sausages, smoked meat products, ham, and minced meat-ranged from 4.5% to 5.8% and the differences between them were not significant (p > 0.05). Sequence analysis of selected B1-positive samples demonstrated mostly the alleles of clonal type III (49.0%), and less-type II (17.3%), and type I (10.2%) based on nine used genetic markers. The combinations of types I/II or II/III or I/III alleles at different loci were also found in 23.5% of cases. Detection of T. gondii DNA in raw meat products may indicate the potential health threat for consumers in Poland; however, for complete risk assessment of T. gondii infection, the additional studies, including detection of live parasite, are needed.Entities:
Keywords: PCR; Poland; Toxoplasma gondii; genotyping; prevalence; raw meat products
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30407082 PMCID: PMC6434587 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foodborne Pathog Dis ISSN: 1535-3141 Impact factor: 3.171
Results of
| N | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoked meat products | 9/74 | 11/61 | 8/95 | 3/77 | 3/85 | 3/23 | 2/42 | 1/72 | 1/61 | 1/87 | 2/48 | 4/79 | 0/52 | 48/856 |
| 12.2% (6.5–21.5) | 18.0% (10.4–29.5) | 8.4% (4.3–15.7) | 3.9% (1.3–10.9) | 3.4% (1.2–9.9) | 13% (4.5–32.1) | 4.8% (1.3–15.8) | 1.4% (0.3–7.5) | 1.6% (0.2–8.7) | 1.1% (0.2–6.2) | 4.2% (1.2–14.0) | 5.1% (2–12.3) | 0.0% (0.0–6.9) | 5.7% (4.3–7.4) | |
| Sausages | 18/101 | 18/93 | 5/65 | 4/112 | 3/201 | 4/66 | 10/98 | 5/92 | 0/77 | 0/156 | 2/70 | 5/143 | 5/81 | 79/1355 |
| 17.8% (11.6–26.4) | 19.4% (12.6–28.5) | 7.7% (3.3–16.8) | 3.6% (1.4–8.8) | 1.5% (0.5–4.3) | 6.1% (2.4–14.6) | 1.0% (5.6–11.8) | 5.4% (5.2–11.6) | 0.0% (0.0–4.8) | 0.0% (0.0–2.4) | 2.9% (0.8–9.8) | 3.5% (1.5–7.9) | 6.2% (2.7–13.7) | 5.8% (4.7–7.2) | |
| Ham | 3/16 | 9/31 | 2/19 | n/e | 0/26 | 0/9 | 0/28 | 0/20 | 0/9 | 0/34 | 0/18 | 0/19 | 0/27 | 14/256 |
| 18.8% (6.6–43.0) | 29.0% (16.1–46.6) | 10.5% (2.9–31.4) | 0.0% (0.0–12.8) | 0.0%/(0.0–29.9) | 0.0% (0.0–12.1) | 0.0% (0.0–16.1) | 0.0% (0.0–29.9) | 0.0% (0.0–10.2) | 0.0% (0.0–17.6) | 0.0% (0.0–16.8) | 0.0% (0.0–12.5) | 5.5% (3.3–9.0) | ||
| Minced meat | 3/70 | 4/50 | 10/53 | 2/55 | 3/102 | 0/30 | 2/45 | 0/100 | 7/94 | 0/100 | 0/6 | n/e | 3/51 | 34/756 |
| 4.3% (1.5–11.9) | 8.0% (3.2–18.8) | 18.9% (10.6–31.4) | 3.6% (0.6–13.6) | 2.9% (1.0–8.3) | 0.0% (0.0–11.4) | 4.4% (1.2–14.8) | 0.0% (3.7–14.6) | 7.4% (3.7–14.6) | 0.0% (0.0–3.7) | 0.0% (0.0–39.0) | 5.9% (2.0–15.9) | 4.5% (3.3–9.0) | ||
| Total | 33/261 | 42/235 | 25/232 | 9/244 | 9/414 | 7/128 | 14/213 | 6/284 | 8/241 | 1/377 | 4/142 | 9/241 | 8/211 | 175/3223 |
| 12.6%[ | 17.9%[ | 10.8%[ | 3.7% (2.0–6.9) | 2.2% (1.2–4.1) | 5.5% (2.7–10.9) | 6.6% (4.0–10.7) | 2.1% (1.0–4.5) | 3.3% (1.7–6.4) | 0.3% (0.0–1.5) | 2.8% (1.1–7.0) | 3.7% (2.0–7.0) | 3.8% (2.0–7.3) | 5.4% (4.7–6.3) | |
Significant differences in percentages of positive results in comparison with other regions of Poland (p < 0.05).
The regions of Poland: Mp, Małopolskie; Pk, Podkarpackie; Lb, Lubelskie; Pl, Podlaskie; W-m, Warmińsko-Mazurskie; Pm, Pomorskie; Wk, Wielkopolskie; Dl, Dolnośląskie; Śl, Śląskie; Św, Świętokrzyskie; Zp, Zachodniopomorskie; M, Mazowieckie; Kp, Kujawsko-pomorskie.
n/e, not examined; CI, 95% confidence interval.

Results of DNA detection in raw meat products from selected regions of Poland.
Distribution of
| 1 | 1 | n/a | n/a | III | n/a | II | n/a | — | — | — |
| 1 | II | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||
| 2 | 1 | II/III | III | n/a | III | n/a | n/a | — | — | — |
| 3 | 1 | II/III | III | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1 | I | n/a | n/a | III | n/a | n/a | — | — | — |
| 2 | II/III | III | ||||||||
| 5 | 1 | I | n/a | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | — | — | — |
| 1 | II/III | I/II[ | ||||||||
| 1 | II/III | n/a | II | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||
| 6 | 1 | n/a | n/a | III | III | n/a | n/a | — | — | — |
| 7 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | III | I/II[ | n/a | — | — | — |
| 1 | I/III[ | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||
| 1 | II | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||
| 2 | III | III | — | — | — | |||||
| 8 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | III | n/a | I/III[ | — | — | — |
| 9 | 6 | II/III | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | -/n/a | -/n/a | -/n/a |
| 1 | II/III | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||
| 10 | 6 | n/a | n/a | n/a | III | n/a | n/a | — | — | — |
| 2 | I | |||||||||
| 3 | II | |||||||||
| 11 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | I/II[ | n/a | — | — | — |
| 3 | II | -/n/a | -/n/a | -/n/a | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||
| III | -/n/a | -/n/a | -/n/a | |||||||
| 12 | 2 | n/a | n/a | I/II[ | n/a | n/a | n/a | — | — | — |
| 2 | III | -/n/a | -/n/a | -/n/a | ||||||
| 13 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | I/III[ | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1 | I | II | n/a | II | I | n/a | III | n/a | II |
| 15 | 1 | n/a | n/a | III | III | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 16 | 1 | n/a | n/a | III | III | III | n/a | III | n/a | n/a |
| 17 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | III | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | II |
| 18 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | II | n/a | n/a | II | n/a | n/a |
| 19 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | I | n/a | n/a | n/a | I | n/a |
| 1 | II | III | ||||||||
| 20 | 1 | n/a | I/III[ | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 21 | 2 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | III |
| 22 | 1 | I | n/a | I/II[ | I | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 23 | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | III | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | III |
GenBank accession numbers for selected sequences: MH429059- MH429071, MH536007- MH536012, and MH606148–MH606184.
At SAG1 locus, types II and III are indistinguishable.
Distinction between these types was not possible, probably a mix of T. gondii strains occurred.
—, not examined; n/a, product not amplified; -/n/a, part of samples not examined, for next part of samples − product not amplified.
The Summary of
| N | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| 31 | 4 | 7 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 98 | 10[ | 17[ | 48[ | 6[ | 13[ | 4[ |
Distinction between these types was not possible, probably a mix of T. gondii strains occurred.
N of T. gondii DNA samples (percentage).
The Summary of Genotyping in Relation to the Regions of Study (Poland)
| N | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kujawsko-Pomorskie | 9 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Małopolskie | 40 | 5 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 11[ | 2 |
| Mazowieckie | 10 | 0 | 2 | 7[ | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Podkarpackie | 13 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Wielkopolskie | 14 | 1 | 3 | 7[ | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Zachodniopomorskie | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 10 (10.2%) | 17 (17.3%) | 48 (49.0%) | 6 (6.1%) | 13 (13.3%) | 4 (4.1%) |
Distinction between these types was not possible, probably a mix of T. gondii strains occurred.
Significant differences in the number of genotypes determined for particular amplicons, in comparison with other regions of Poland (p < 0.05).
The Number of Meat Product Samples with the Homologous Genotypes Obtained at Used Markers, in Relation to the Regions of Study
| Kujawsko–Pomorskie | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Małopolskie | 2 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Mazowieckie | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Podkarpackie | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Wielkopolskie | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Zachodniopomorskie | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Total | 3 (9.7%) | 7 (22.6%) | 21 (67.7%) | 31 |
The Summary of Genotyping in Sixty-One Meat Products Samples, in Relation to Their Types
| Sausages | 37 | 5 | 4 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Smoked meat products | 24 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 1 |
| Hams | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Minced meat (total), including | 30 | 5 | 9[ | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Pork | 8 | 0 | 0 | 7[ | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Beef | 22 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 98 | 10 (10.2%) | 17 (17.3%) | 48 (49.0%) | 6 (6.1%) | 13 (13.3%) | 4 (4.1%) |
Distinction between these types was not possible, probably a mix of T. gondii strains occurred.
Significant differences in the number of genotypes determined for particular amplicons, in comparison with other types of meat products or in a particular group of meat products (p < 0.05).