Literature DB >> 32364468

Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research.

Neal W Dickert1, Amanda Michelle Bernard2, JoAnne M Brabson2, Rodney J Hunter3, Regina McLemore2, Andrea R Mitchell1, Stephen Palmer2, Barbara Reed2, Michele Riedford2, Raymond T Simpson2, Candace D Speight1, Tracie Steadman2, Rebecca D Pentz2.   

Abstract

Clinical trials for acute conditions such as myocardial infarction and stroke pose challenges related to informed consent due to time limitations, stress, and severe illness. Consent processes should be sensitive to the context in which trials are conducted and to needs of patients and surrogate decision-makers. This manuscript describes a collaborative effort between ethicists, researchers, patients, and surrogates to develop patient-driven, patient-centered approaches to consent for clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction and stroke.Our group identified important ways in which existing consent processes and forms for clinical trials fail to meet patients' and surrogates' needs in the acute context. We collaborated to create model forms and consent processes that are substantially shorter and, hopefully, better-matched to patients' and surrogates' needs and expectations from the perspective of content, structure, and tone. These changes, however, challenge some common conventions regarding consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Informed consent; acute care; myocardial infarction; patient-centered care; research ethics; stroke

Year:  2020        PMID: 32364468     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  7 in total

1.  Bridging the Researcher-Participant Gap: A Research Agenda to Build Effective Research Relationships.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Devan M Duenas; Hannah Lewis; Seema K Shah
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Parental Enrollment Decision-Making for a Neonatal Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Elliott Mark Weiss; Katherine F Guttmann; Aleksandra E Olszewski; Brooke E Magnus; Sijia Li; Scott Y H Kim; Anita R Shah; Sandra E Juul; Yvonne W Wu; Kaashif A Ahmad; Ellen Bendel-Stenzel; Natalia A Isaza; Andrea L Lampland; Amit M Mathur; Rakesh Rao; David Riley; David G Russell; Zeynep N I Salih; Carrie B Torr; Joern-Hendrik Weitkamp; Uchenna E Anani; Taeun Chang; Juanita Dudley; John Flibotte; Erin M Havrilla; Alexandra C O'Kane; Krystle Perez; Brenda J Stanley; Seema K Shah; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Consent for Acute Care Research and the Regulatory "Gray Zone".

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Christopher J Lindsell; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Promoting Disclosure and Understanding in Informed Consent: Optimizing the Impact of the Common Rule "Key Information" Requirement.

Authors:  Kathryn M Porter; Elliott M Weiss; Stephanie A Kraft
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin.

Authors:  Marieke A R Bak; Rens Veeken; Marieke T Blom; Hanno L Tan; Dick L Willems
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Demonstrating 'respect for persons' in clinical research: findings from qualitative interviews with diverse genomics research participants.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Erin Rothwell; Seema K Shah; Devan M Duenas; Hannah Lewis; Kristin Muessig; Douglas J Opel; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Alternative Consent Models in Pragmatic Palliative Care Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Joan G Carpenter; Connie Ulrich; Nancy Hodgson; Laura C Hanson; Mary Ersek
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.