| Literature DB >> 32363738 |
Seyedeh Zahra Bakhti1, Saeid Latifi-Navid1, Reza Safaralizadeh2.
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori is known as an important determinant of preneoplastic lesions or gastric cancer (GC) risk. The bacterial genotypes may determine the clinical outcomes. However, the evidence for these associations has varied between and within continents, and the actual effect of each gene and corresponding allelic variants are still debatable. In recent years, two new models have been proposed to predict the risk of GC; the phylogeographic origin of H. pylori strains and a disrupted co-evolution between H. pylori and its human host, which potentially explain the geographic differences in the risk of H. pylori-related cancer. However, these models and earlier ones based on putative virulence factors of the bacterium may not fully justify differences in the incidence of GC, reflecting that new theories should be developed and examined. Notably, the new findings also support the role of ancestry-specific germline alteration in contributing to the ethnic/population differences in cancer risk. Moreover the high and low incidence areas of GC have shown differences in transmission ecology, largely affecting the composition of H. pylori populations. As a new hypothesis, it is proposed that any high-risk population may have its own specific risk loci (or variants) as well as new H. pylori strains with national/maybe regional gene pools that should be considered. The latter is seen in the Americas where the rapid evolution of distinct H. pylori subpopulations has been occurred. It is therefore proposed that the deep sequencing of both H. pylori and its human host is simultaneously performed in GC patients and age-sex-matched controls from high-risk areas. The expression and functional activities of the identified new determinants of GC must then be assessed and matched with human and pathogen ancestry, because some of risk loci are ancestry-specific. In addition, potential study-level covariates and moderator variables (eg physical conditions, life styles, gastric microbiome, etc) linked to causal relationships, and their impact, should be recognized and controlled.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Helicobacter pylorizzm321990; ancestry; co-evolution; gastric cancer; risk predictor; virulence genes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32363738 PMCID: PMC7333836 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
Ancestry of global Helicobacter pylori strains
|
| Geographic distribution |
|---|---|
|
| Europe, Middle East, India, Bangladesh, Iran, Colombia, Portugal, Brazil, Cape Verde, Angola, Morocco, Algeria, Israel, Lebanon, Spain, France, Germany, Estonia, Finland, Russia, UK, Turkey, Palestine, Italy |
|
| |
|
| East Asians, China, Japan, Korea, Bhutan |
|
| Taiwan Aboriginals, Melanesians, Polynesians |
|
| Native Americans, North and South America, Bhutan |
|
| |
|
| Western Africa, Senegal, Colombia, Brazil, South America, Burkina Faso, Angola, South Africa, Cameroon, Morocco, Cape Verde, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Guatemala |
|
| South Africa, Madagascar, Brazil, Angola, South Africa, Namibia, Cameroon, Mozambique |
|
| Cameroon |
|
| South Africa, Angola |
|
| Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Northern Nigeria, Algeria |
|
| Northern India, Bangladesh, Thailand, Malaysia |
|
| Australia Aboriginals and Papua New Guineans, Tasmania |
Figure 1Helicobacter pylori ancestry and global age‐standardized incidence rates (ASR) of gastric cancer (GC). The figure explains how different H. pylori ancestries are distributed in the high‐ moderate‐, and low‐incidence areas of GC, and whether a particular sub‐population has a greater tendency to the areas with the high incidence of cancer. Among the bacterial ancestries, hspEAsia (a sub‐population of hpEastAsia) has been globally distributed in regions (East Asian countries) with the high incidence of GC, and hpEurope in areas with the low and moderate incidence of GC. The rest of populations are globally distributed in areas with low incidence of GC, which also include hpAfrica1 (hspSAfrica, hspWAfrica, and hspCAfrica), hpAfrica2, hpNEAfrica, hpAsia2, hpSahul, and other sub‐populations of hpEastAsia; hspAmerind, and hspMaori
Prevalence (percentage) of the H. pylori vacA alleles and cagA genotype in the world
| ASR‐Both Sexes (GLOBOCAN 2012) | Population of World | AM | GM | AM m1 (vs m2) | GM m1 (vs m2) | AM i1 (vs i2) | GM i1 (vs i2) | AM d1 (vs d2) | GM d1 (vs d2) | AM | GM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | South‐Central Asia | 80.36% | 78.93% | 47.90% | 41.92% | 49.55% | 50.06% | 47.42% | 49.56% | 70.81% | 68.62% |
| 9.5 | Western Asia | 76.17% | 76.02% | 29.65% | 29.19% | — | — | — | — | 59.71% | 58.83% |
| 6.0 | South‐Eastern Asia | 98.43% | 98.21% | 60.83% | 60.09% | 94.52% | 93.89% | — | — | 89.08% | 86.14% |
| 3.4 | Northern Africa | 56.23% | 58.03% | 49.13% | 32.51% | 47.53% | 57.62% | — | — | 59.40% | 51.53% |
| 5.4 | Northern Europe | 93.86% | 92.13% | 51.44% | 49.89% | — | — | — | — | 59.25% | 59.60% |
| 6.3 | Western Europe | 74.70% | 76.28% | 42.00% | 41.49% | — | — | — | — | 71.38% | 71.41% |
| 8.6 | Southern Europe | 55.99% | 52.32% | 35.67% | 31.67% | 50.64% | 51.25% | — | — | 52.74% | 49.98% |
| 9.3 | Central America | 84.41% | 84.28% | 73.38% | 76.29% | — | — | — | — | 68.28% | 73.56% |
| 10.3 | South America | 78.03% | 75.86% | 73.36% | 65.023% | 73.33% | 74.36% | — | — | 72.82% | 67.58% |
| 13.5 | Central and Eastern Europe | 77.81% | 76.78% | 41.59% | 40.68% | 63.76% | 63.86% | — | — | 73.59% | 63.41% |
| 24.2 | Eastern Asia | 97.23% | 97.76% | 55.51% | 49.95% | 90.14% | 92.55% | 97.95% | 97.96% | 92.44% | 93.23% |
Arithmetic mean.
Geometric mean.
Prevalence (percentage) of the H. pylori vacA alleles and cagA genotype in the low‐, moderate‐, and high‐incidence areas of gastric cancer
| ASR‐both sexes (GLOBOCAN 2012) | AM | GM | AM m1 (vs m2) | GM m1 (vs m2) | AM i1 (vs i2) | GM i1 (vs i2) | AM d1 (vs d2) | GM d1 (vs d2) | AM | GM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRs‐ Both sexes < 10 | 80.32% | 79.38% | 49.79% | 44.24% | 58.66% | 57.72% | 53.33% | 51.53% | 70.31% | 68.04% |
| ASRs‐ Both sexes = 10.3 | 78.03% | 75.86% | 73.36% | 65.02% | 73.33% | 74.36% | — | — | 72.82% | 67.58% |
| ASRs‐ Both sexes = 11‐19 | 77.81% | 76.78% | 41.59% | 40.68% | 63.76% | 63.86% | — | — | 73.59% | 63.41% |
| ASRs‐ Both sexes ≥ 20 | 97.23% | 97.76% | 55.51% | 49.95% | 90.14% | 92.55% | 97.95% | 97.96% | 92.44% | 93.23% |
Arithmetic mean.
Geometric mean.
Include Eastern Africa, Middle Africa, Northern Africa, Southern Africa, Western Africa, Caribbean, Central America, Northern America, South‐Eastern Asia, South‐Central Asia, Western Asia, Northern Europe, Southern Europe, Western Europe, Australia/New Zealand, and Melanesia.
Include South America.
Include Central and Eastern Europe.
Include Eastern Asia.
Associations of the H. pylori vacA alleles and cagA genotype with the risk of gastric cancer in the low‐, moderate‐, and high‐incidence areas of gastric cancer
| ASR‐Both sexes (GLOBOCAN 2012) | Population of World | Country | Study/ Publication Time | Genotype(s) Related to GC |
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.7 | South‐Central Asia | Iran/ Ardabil | Abdi et al. (2017) |
| .046 | 3.00 (1.08‐8.32) |
|
| .020 | 3.25 (1.21‐8.74) | ||||
|
| .038 | 4.28 (1.24‐14.73) | ||||
|
| .028 | 4.82 (1.21‐19.21) | ||||
| Iran | Bakhti et al. (2016) |
| 1.34e‐04 | 4.29 (2.03‐9.08) | ||
|
| 2.52e‐05 | 6.11 (2.63‐14.19) | ||||
|
| .003 | 3.18 (1.49‐6.76) | ||||
|
| 1.89e‐08 | 15.13 (5.86‐39.01) | ||||
|
| .03 | 2.59 (1.09‐6.12) | ||||
|
| 1.47e‐06 | 43.44 (9.35‐201.73) | ||||
|
| 4.00e‐06 | 37.77 (8.07‐176.85) | ||||
| Iran | Rhead et al. (2007) |
| <.05 | — | ||
|
| <.05 | — | ||||
|
| <.0005 | — | ||||
|
| <.005 | — | ||||
| Iran | Basiri et al. (2014) |
| .015 | 4.662 (1.345‐16.164) | ||
| Iran | Mottaghi et al. (2014) |
| .0 | 13.142 (3.116‐55.430) | ||
| Afghanistan | Yakoob et al. (2013) |
| .033 | — | ||
|
| .006 | — | ||||
|
| .007 | — | ||||
|
| .006 | — | ||||
| Pakistan | Yakoob et al. (2013) |
| .006 | — | ||
|
| .002 | — | ||||
|
| .001 | — | ||||
| Pakistan | Khan et al. (2013) |
| <.0005 | — | ||
|
| <.05 | — | ||||
| 9.5 | Western Asia | Turkey | Saribasak et al. (2004) |
| <.001 | — |
| Kurdistan Region, Northern Iraq | Rasheed |
| .002 | — | ||
| 3.4 | Northern Africa | morocco | El Khadir et al. (2017) |
| <.001 | — |
|
| <.001 | — | ||||
|
| <.001 | 29.73 (5.08‐173.73) | ||||
| 6.3 | Western Europe | Belgium | Memon et al. (2014) |
| .01 | 9.37 (1.16 −201.89) |
|
| .003 | 12.08 (1.50‐259.64) | ||||
|
| <.05 | Infinity (0.76‐infinity) | ||||
|
| <.02 | — | ||||
| Germany | Miehlke et al. (2000) |
| .005 | — | ||
|
| .01 | — | ||||
|
| .005 | — | ||||
| 8.6 | Southern Europe | Portugal | Ferreira et al. (2012) |
| <.001 | 22 (7.9‐63) |
| Italy | Basso et al. (2008) |
| <.001 | 8.28 (2.75‐24.95) | ||
|
| <.05 | 5.25 (1.03‐25.80) | ||||
|
| <.001 | 5.02 (2.10‐11.98) | ||||
|
| <.05 | 11.80 (3.43‐40.61) | ||||
| 9.3 | Central America | Southern Mexico | Roman‐Roman et al. (2017) |
| .001 | 6.58 (2.15‐20.08) |
| 10.3 | South America | northern region of Brazil | Vinagre RMDF et al. (2018) |
| .001 | G = 62.52 |
| 13.5 | Central and Eastern Europe | Russian/ Vladivostok | Stenkova et al. (2013) |
| <.04 | 1.3‐fold |
|
| — | — | ||||
| 24.2 | Eastern Asia | China | Wei et al. (2012) |
| <.05 | — |
| Okinawa, Japan | Matsunari et al. (2012) |
| .03 | — | ||
|
| .01 | — | ||||
|
| .04 | — | ||||
| East‐Asian‐type | .01 | — | ||||
|
| .006 | — | ||||
| East‐Asian‐type | .003 | — |
For each study, all the single genotypes associated with GC were considered. About the two‐ and three‐genotype combinations, the ones with the highest OR values were expressed.
Figure 2A, Interaction and co‐evolution between H. pylori and human host in gastric cancer (GC) susceptibility. B, Host responses and risk for GC progression