Literature DB >> 32363568

Immunochromatographic test and ELISA for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins as an alternative for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile-associated diarrhea in foals and neonatal piglets.

Carolina Pantuzza Ramos1, Emily Oliveira Lopes1, Carlos Augusto Oliveira Júnior1, Amanda Nádia Diniz1, Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato1, Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva2.   

Abstract

Considering the lack of studies evaluating the performance of commercially available methods for diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in animals, the present study aimed to assess an immunochromatographic test for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins of C. difficile, also evaluated by an ELISA kit, in foals and neonatal piglets. Intestinal contents of 47 piglets and feces of 35 foals were tested to GDH antigen and A/B toxins in a lateral flow method (Ecodiagnostica, Brazil). Also, these samples were submitted to A/B toxin detection by an ELISA kit (C. difficile Tox A/B II, Techlab Inc., USA), using the toxigenic culture (TC) as the reference method. The GDH component of the lateral flow test showed sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% and a high specificity in samples of piglets (82.61%) and foals (100%). Detection of A/B toxins using the lateral flow test and the ELISA resulted in a specificity of 100% in samples of both species. On the other hand, the sensibility ranged from 54.2 to 90% for the ELISA and from 12.5 to 60% for the lateral flow test for piglets' and foals' samples, respectively. In conclusion, the present work suggests that the lateral flow test for GDH detection could be a useful method for diagnosing CDI in these species. On the other hand, the low sensitivity of the lateral flow test for A/B toxins might compromise its utility in piglets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colitis; Horses; Nosocomial diarrhea; Swine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32363568      PMCID: PMC7455628          DOI: 10.1007/s42770-020-00275-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile testing: after 20 years, still challenging.

Authors:  Tracy D Wilkins; David M Lyerly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Impact of simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay on Clostridium difficile diagnosis and treatment in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in a university hospital of Brazil.

Authors:  Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva; Amanda Pontes Nader; Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato; Eduardo Garcia Vilela
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.029

3.  Validation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in feces of horses with acute diarrhea.

Authors:  C E Medina-Torres; J S Weese; H R Staempfli
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Johan S Bakken; Karen C Carroll; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Kevin W Garey; Carolyn V Gould; Ciaran Kelly; Vivian Loo; Julia Shaklee Sammons; Thomas J Sandora; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for Clostridium difficile colonization in dogs and cats hospitalized in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jennifer Clooten; Stephen Kruth; Luis Arroyo; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Authors:  Kerrie Eastwood; Patrick Else; André Charlett; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of two enzyme immunoassays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in swine.

Authors:  Michael A Anderson; J Glenn Songer
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Acute diarrhea in hospitalized horses.

Authors:  Ann M Chapman
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.792

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile infection in horses: a review.

Authors:  S S Diab; G Songer; F A Uzal
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in a small animal veterinary teaching hospital.

Authors:  J S Weese; J Armstrong
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of an immunochromatographic test for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in dogs.

Authors:  Carolina Pantuzza Ramos; Amanda Nádia Diniz; Suzana Martins Leite; Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato; Silvia Trindade Pereira; Mário Cesar Rennó; Eliane de Oliveira Ferreira; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 2.  Clostridioides difficile infection and One Health: an equine perspective.

Authors:  Natasza M R Hain-Saunders; Daniel R Knight; Mieghan Bruce; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.476

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.