Literature DB >> 34562233

Evaluation of an immunochromatographic test for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in dogs.

Carolina Pantuzza Ramos1, Amanda Nádia Diniz1, Suzana Martins Leite2, Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato1, Silvia Trindade Pereira3, Mário Cesar Rennó4, Eliane de Oliveira Ferreira2, Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate an immunochromatographic test used to detect glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in dogs. Fecal samples of 119 diarrheic dogs were subjected to toxigenic culture as the "gold standard" method and to GDH detection (Ecodiagnostica, Brazil). Samples positive for toxigenic C. difficile strains and those positive in the GDH test were also subjected to A/B toxin detection using an enzyme immunoassay kit (C. difficile Tox A/B II, Techlab Inc., USA). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were measured for GDH detection and compared with the toxigenic culture results. A total of 19 (15.9%) dogs were positive for toxigenic C. difficile. Of these, 10 (52.6%) dogs were positive for A/B toxins using the enzyme immunoassay kit and 18 (15.2%) were positive in the GDH test, leading to a sensitivity and NPV of 89.4% and 97.9%, respectively. Three animals, two of which were colonized with non-toxigenic strains, were positive for GDH, though not confirmed with CDI, resulting in a high specificity (97%) and PPV (85%). The results suggest that the lateral flow test for GDH detection could be a useful method for diagnosing CDI in dogs, similar to that previously described for humans and other animal species.
© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canine; Colitis; Dysbiosis; Hemorrhagic; Nosocomial diarrhea

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34562233      PMCID: PMC8578347          DOI: 10.1007/s42770-021-00615-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.214


  28 in total

1.  Dogs are carriers of Clostridioides difficile lineages associated with human community-acquired infections.

Authors:  Olivia Graaf Bjöersdorff; Sanna Lindberg; Kristoffer Kiil; Søren Persson; Luca Guardabassi; Peter Damborg
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  A prospective study of the roles of clostridium difficile and enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens in equine diarrhoea.

Authors:  J S Weese; H R Staempfli; J F Prescott
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Johan S Bakken; Karen C Carroll; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Kevin W Garey; Carolyn V Gould; Ciaran Kelly; Vivian Loo; Julia Shaklee Sammons; Thomas J Sandora; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin and Clostridium difficile toxin A/B do not play a role in acute haemorrhagic diarrhoea syndrome in dogs.

Authors:  K Busch; J S Suchodolski; K A Kühner; Y Minamoto; J M Steiner; R S Mueller; K Hartmann; S Unterer
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 5.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

6.  More than 50% of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Pet Dogs in Flagstaff, USA, Carry Toxigenic Genotypes.

Authors:  Nathan E Stone; Lindsay C Sidak-Loftis; Jason W Sahl; Adam J Vazquez; Kristin B Wiggins; John D Gillece; Nathan D Hicks; James M Schupp; Joseph D Busch; Paul Keim; David M Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile in infants in Oxfordshire, UK: Risk factors for colonization and carriage, and genetic overlap with regional C. difficile infection strains.

Authors:  Nicole Stoesser; David W Eyre; T Phuong Quan; Heather Godwin; Gemma Pill; Emily Mbuvi; Alison Vaughan; David Griffiths; Jessica Martin; Warren Fawley; Kate E Dingle; Sarah Oakley; Kazimierz Wanelik; John M Finney; Melina Kachrimanidou; Catrin E Moore; Sherwood Gorbach; Thomas V Riley; Derrick W Crook; Tim E A Peto; Mark H Wilcox; A Sarah Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile infection: review.

Authors:  Jacek Czepiel; Mirosław Dróżdż; Hanna Pituch; Ed J Kuijper; William Perucki; Aleksandra Mielimonka; Sarah Goldman; Dorota Wultańska; Aleksander Garlicki; Grażyna Biesiada
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  The incidence of Clostridioides difficile and Clostridium perfringens netF-positive strains in diarrheic dogs.

Authors:  Amanda Nadia Diniz; Fernanda Morcatti Coura; Maja Rupnik; Vicki Adams; Thomas L Stent; Julian I Rood; Carlos Augusto de Oliveira; Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.331

10.  Enteric Organisms Detected in Feces of Dogs With Bloody Diarrhea: 45 Cases.

Authors:  Carolina Pantuzza Ramos; Amanda Nádia Diniz; Marcio Garcia Ribeiro; Carolina Lechinski de Paula; Érica Azevedo Costa; Luciana Sonne; Silvia Trindade Pereira; Carlos Eduardo Bastos Lopes; Mário Cesar Rennó; Rodrigo Otávio Silveira Silva
Journal:  Top Companion Anim Med       Date:  2021-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.