| Literature DB >> 32363007 |
Kirtana Ramadugu1, Freida Blostein1, Deesha Bhaumik1, Wenwen Jiang1, Elyse Davis1, Elizabeth Salzman1, Usha Srinivasan1, Carl F Marrs1, Katherine Neiswanger2,3, Daniel W McNeil3,4, Mary L Marazita2,3,5, Betsy Foxman1,3,4.
Abstract
Objective: The interactions between yeast and streptococci species that lead to dental decay and gingivitis are poorly understood. Our study describes these associations among a cohort of 101 post-partum women enrolled in the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia, 2012-2013.Entities:
Keywords: Dental caries; gingivitis; mitis streptococci; salivary microbiome
Year: 2020 PMID: 32363007 PMCID: PMC7178893 DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1746494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Microbiol ISSN: 2000-2297 Impact factor: 5.474
Sociodemographic characteristics of selected samplea of Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia Cohort 2 at the 2-month visit by study site
| Pennsylvania (N = 77) | West Virginia (N = 24) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mother’s Age: | 0.02 | ||
| 18–24 | 10 (13.0%) | 9 (37.5%) | |
| 25–34 | 54 (70.1%) | 10 (41.7%) | |
| 35+ | 13 (16.9%) | 5 (20.8%) | |
| Delivery Route: | 0.88 | ||
| C-section | 22 (28.6%) | 8 (33.3%) | |
| Missing | 2 (2.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Vaginal | 53 (68.8%) | 16 (66.7%) | |
| Household Income: | 0.10 | ||
| Missing | 2 (2.6%) | 1 (4.2%) | |
| Under $25,000 | 18 (23.4%) | 8 (33.3%) | |
| Between $25,000 and $50,000 | 13 (16.9%) | 8 (33.3%) | |
| Between $50,000 and $100,000 | 28 (36.4%) | 6 (25.0%) | |
| Over $100,000 | 16 (20.8%) | 1 (4.2%) | |
| Education Status: | 0.03 | ||
| High school or less | 13 (16.9%) | 9 (37.5%) | |
| Associate’s degree or less | 21 (27.3%) | 8 (33.3%) | |
| Bachelor’s degree | 27 (35.1%) | 4 (16.7%) | |
| Graduate school degree | 16 (20.8%) | 2 (8.3%) | |
| Missing | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (4.2%) |
p-values compare visits within sites.
aSampled from COHRA 2 participants enrolled between 2012 and 2013. Women with no decayed missing or filled teeth (DMFT = 0) were oversampled (n = 21); the remaining participants were selected by ordering by DMFT and taking a systematic sample to represent the range of DMFT among participants enrolled by 2013.
Oral health and health behaviors of selected samplea of Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia (COHRA) Cohort 2 at 2-month visit by study site
| Pennsylvania | West Virginiab | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ~ 2-month visit | ~12-month visit | ~ 2-month visit | ~24-month visit | |||
| No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | |||
| Active Decay Detected | 21 (27.3%) | 26 (33.8%) | 0.48 | 13 (54.2%) | 16 (72.7%) | 0.34 |
| Currently Breastfeeding | 48 (62.3%) | 25 (32.5%) | <0.001 | 13 (54.2%) | 1 (4.55%) | <0.001 |
| Currently Smoking | 19 (24.7%) | 22 (28.9%) | 0.68 | 10 (43.5%) | 11 (50.0%) | 0.53 |
| Currently Drinking Alcohol | 46 (59.7%) | 62 (81.6%) | 0.005 | 3 (13.0%) | 10 (45.5%) | 0.03 |
| Decayed, Missing and Filled Tooth (DMFT) | 0.82 | 0.97 | ||||
| DMFT 1–7 | 29 (37.7%) | 31 (40.3%) | 12 (50.0%) | 9 (40.9%) | ||
| DMFT 8+ | 32 (41.6%) | 33 (42.9%) | 10 (41.7%) | 11 (50.0%) | ||
| No Caries | 16 (20.8%) | 13 (16.9%) | 2 (8.3%) | 2 (9.1%) | ||
| Generalized gingivitis | 10 (13.0%) | 15 (19.5%) | 0.38 | 5 (20.8%) | 11 (50.0%) | 0.07 |
| Localized gingivitis | 49 (63.6%) | 42 (54.5%) | 0.33 | 6 (25.0%) | 9 (40.9%) | 0.35 |
p-values compare visits within sites.
aSampled from COHRA 2 participants with a 2-month visit between 2012 and 2013. Women with no decayed missing or filled teeth (DMFT = 0) were oversampled (n = 21); the remaining participants were selected by ordering by DMFT and taking a systematic sample to represent the range of DMFT among participants with a 2-month visit by 2013.
bIn addition, we included a 12-month visit for two West Virginia participants. One of these participants had a DMFT of 1–7 the other a DMFT of 8+; one had generalized gingivitis and the other active decay.
Figure 1.(a) Waffle plots of the average relative abundance for the four community state types (CSTs) at the genus level. Each square represents a one percent contribution to the average relative abundance. (b1) Dynamics of CST between 2-months (n = 77) and 12-months (n = 75) post-partum (Pennsylvania participants). (b2). Dynamics of CST between 2 months (n = 24) and 12 (n = 2) or 24 (n = 22) months post-partum (West Virginia participants). Women participating in the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia Cohort 2 from Pennsylvania and West Virginia
Figure 2.Heat map showing the relative abundance of salivary taxa at 2 months and 12 months (n = 77) post-partum (Pennsylvania participants) and 2 and 12 (n = 2) or 2 and 24 (n = 22) months post-partum (West Virginian participants). Women participating in the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia Cohort 2. Each column represents results from one sample; each individual appears twice. Dendrogram shows Bray-Curtis distance between salivary microbiomes by the overall distribution of taxa. The top three rows under the dendrogram indicate community state type (CST), presence of active decay, and generalized gingivitis of each individual, respectively. CSTs were identified using Dirichlet multinomial mixed models and named based on the organisms present
Figure 3.Colonization with mitis streptococci and Candida albicans and association with dental decay including samples from all included visits (n = 202). (a) Venn diagram showing the overlap in colonization among selected mitis streptococci and C. albicans. C. albicans mainly occurs in the presence of S. mutans. (b) Prevalence of selected mitis streptococci and C. albicans, by community state type. (c) Association with active decay by the presence of C. albicans. Prevalence of active decay increases in the presence of C. albicans. Women participating in the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia Cohort 2 from Pennsylvania (n = 77) and West Virginia (n = 24)
Marginal models predicting active dental decay in 101 Appalachian mothers at 2 points during the post-partum perioda
| Models including all 185 participants with complete information | Models including all 202 participants (missing values are imputed) | |
|---|---|---|
| qPCR Detection Models | ||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| S. | 1.84 (0.83, 4.1) | 2.04 (0.94, 4.41) |
| C. | 1.47 (0.66, 3.28) | 1.53 (0.7, 3.38) |
| Currently drinking alcohol | 0.58 (0.3, 1.13) | 0.55 (0.29, 1.05) |
| Generalized gingivitis | 4.18 (1.79, 9.75) | 4.31 (1.91, 9.72) |
| West Virginia | 1.91 (0.7, 5.19) | 2.05 (0.75, 5.56) |
| Currently Breastfeeding | 0.49 (0.27, 0.88) | 0.41 (0.22, 0.75) |
| Currently Smoking | 3.59 (1.62, 7.98) | 4.00 (1.79, 8.93) |
| Both S. | 2.72 (1.12, 6.62) | 3.13 (1.26, 7.75) |
| Community State Type (CST) Models | ||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| CST (reference: Mixed Species) | ||
| | 2.89 (1.08, 7.7) | 2.97 (1.11, 7.97) |
| | 1.94 (0.75, 5.03) | 2.16 (0.82, 5.64) |
| | 1.16 (0.1, 12.8) | 2.01 (0.26, 15.59) |
| C. | 1.69 (0.65, 4.39) | 1.70 (0.67, 4.31) |
| Currently drinking alcohol | 0.58 (0.31, 1.08) | 0.53 (0.29, 0.98) |
| Generalized gingivitis | 4.52 (1.78, 11.46) | 5.13 (2.03, 12.95) |
| West Virginia | 2.16 (0.8, 5.86) | 2.25 (0.83, 6.14) |
| Currently Breastfeeding | 0.48 (0.26, 0.89) | 0.41 (0.22, 0.77) |
| Currently Smoking | 3.07 (1.32, 7.11) | 3.18 (1.34, 7.52) |
aParticipants in the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia Cohort 2: 77 Pennsylvania women who donated saliva at the 2-month and 12-month visits and 24 West Virginia women who donated saliva at the 2-month and 12 or 24-month post-partum visit.
Marginal models predicting generalized gingivitis in 101 Appalachian mothers at 2 time points during the post-partum perioda
| Models including all 185 participants with complete information | Models including all 202 participants (missing values are imputed) | |
|---|---|---|
| qPCR Detection Models | ||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| S. | 0.57 (0.2, 1.65) | 0.55 (0.21, 1.44) |
| C. | 2.41 (0.8, 7.24) | 2.33 (0.81, 6.75) |
| Currently drinking alcohol | 0.66 (0.27, 1.62) | 0.64 (0.28, 1.49) |
| Active Decay | 5.78 (1.91, 17.53) | 4.94 (1.63, 14.98) |
| West Virginia | 2.03 (0.62, 6.68) | 2.06 (0.67, 6.27) |
| Currently Breastfeeding | 0.15 (0.05, 0.46) | 0.21 (0.07, 0.61) |
| Currently Smoking | 1.78 (0.69, 4.61) | 1.74 (0.7, 4.34) |
| Both S. | 1.38 (0.44, 4.29) | 1.27 (0.41, 3.93) |
| Community State Type (CST) Models | ||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| CST (reference: Mixed Species) | ||
| | 0.22 (0.04, 1.12) | 0.23 (0.05, 0.97) |
| | 0.39 (0.1, 1.55) | 0.38 (0.11, 1.33) |
| | 0.17 (0.01, 2.15) | 0.16 (0.02, 1.36) |
| C. | 3.01 (0.96, 9.45) | 2.76 (0.88, 8.71) |
| Currently drinking alcohol | 0.58 (0.25, 1.36) | 0.54 (0.24, 1.17) |
| Active Decay | 7.69 (2.54, 23.31) | 6.63 (2.35, 18.73) |
| West Virginia | 1.87 (0.56, 6.2) | 1.75 (0.56, 5.53) |
| Currently Breastfeeding | 0.15 (0.04, 0.52) | 0.2 (0.06, 0.63) |
| Currently Smoking | 2.25 (0.77, 6.57) | 2.29 (0.81, 6.47) |
aParticipants in the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia Cohort 2: 77 Pennsylvania women who donated saliva at the 2-month and 12-month visits and 24 West Virginia women who donated saliva at the 2-month and 12 or 24-month post-partum visit.
Results of ALDEx2 analysis comparing women with the combination of active decay and generalized gingivitis to those with neither*. Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia Cohort 2 participants. Effect sizes of taxa with p values <0.02 at 2 or 12 months; those meeting this criterion are bolded. Negative values represent factors positively associated with active decay and gingivitis; positive values represent a negative association with active decay and gingivitis
| Effect Size | ||
|---|---|---|
| Taxa | 2 months | 12 months |
| 0.384 | ||
| 0.600 | ||
| −0.477 | ||
| −0.647 | ||
| 0.473 | ||
| 0.891 | ||
| 0.686 | ||
| 0.595 | −0.834 | |
| 0.481 | ||
| 0.733 | ||
| −0.771 | ||
| −0.167 | ||
| 0.104 | ||
*12 with active decay and generalized gingivitis and 64 with neither at 2-month post-partum; 15 with active decay and generalized gingivitis and 51 with neither at 12-month post-partum.
Note: Taxa not identified to the species level are given an arbitrary number. These sequences were further identified using NCBI BLAST in Supplemental Table 2.