| Literature DB >> 34783092 |
Connor P Dolan1,2,3, Felisha Imholt1, Tae-Jung Yang1, Rihana Bokhari1, Joshua Gregory1, Mingquan Yan1, Osama Qureshi1, Katherine Zimmel1, Kirby M Sherman1, Alyssa Falck4, Ling Yu1, Eric Leininger5, Regina Brunauer1, Larry J Suva1, Dana Gaddy4, Lindsay A Dawson1, Ken Muneoka1,5.
Abstract
Amputation of the mouse digit tip results in blastema-mediated regeneration. In this model, new bone regenerates de novo to lengthen the amputated stump bone, resulting in a functional replacement of the terminal phalangeal element along with associated non-skeletal tissues. Physiological examples of bone repair, such as distraction osteogenesis and fracture repair, are well known to require mechanical loading. However, the role of mechanical loading during mammalian digit tip regeneration is unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that reducing mechanical loading inhibits blastema formation by attenuating bone resorption and wound closure, resulting in the complete inhibition of digit regeneration. Mechanical unloading effects on wound healing and regeneration are completely reversible when mechanical loading is restored. Mechanical unloading after blastema formation results in a reduced rate of de novo bone formation, demonstrating mechanical load dependence of the bone regenerative response. Moreover, enhancing the wound-healing response of mechanically unloaded digits with the cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive Dermabond improves wound closure and partially rescues digit tip regeneration. Taken together, these results demonstrate that mammalian digit tip regeneration is mechanical load-dependent. Given that human fingertip regeneration shares many characteristics with the mouse digit tip, these results identify mechanical load as a previously unappreciated requirement for de novo bone regeneration in humans.Entities:
Keywords: BLASTEMA; DE NOVO BONE FORMATION; DIGIT; HINDLIMB UNLOADING; MAMMALIAN REGENERATION; MECHANICAL UNLOADING
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34783092 PMCID: PMC9400037 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bone Miner Res ISSN: 0884-0431 Impact factor: 6.390