Literature DB >> 32361063

Suspect and non-targeted screening of chemicals of emerging concern for human biomonitoring, environmental health studies and support to risk assessment: From promises to challenges and harmonisation issues.

Mariane Pourchet1, Laurent Debrauwer2, Jana Klanova3, Elliott J Price4, Adrian Covaci5, Noelia Caballero-Casero5, Herbert Oberacher6, Marja Lamoree7, Annelaure Damont8, François Fenaille8, Jelle Vlaanderen9, Jeroen Meijer10, Martin Krauss11, Denis Sarigiannis12, Robert Barouki13, Bruno Le Bizec1, Jean-Philippe Antignac14.   

Abstract

Large-scale suspect and non-targeted screening approaches based on high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) are today available for chemical profiling and holistic characterisation of biological samples. These advanced techniques allow the simultaneous detection of a large number of chemical features, including markers of human chemical exposure. Such markers are of interest for biomonitoring, environmental health studies and support to risk assessment. Furthermore, these screening approaches have the promising capability to detect chemicals of emerging concern (CECs), document the extent of human chemical exposure, generate new research hypotheses and provide early warning support to policy. Whilst of growing importance in the environment and food safety areas, respectively, CECs remain poorly addressed in the field of human biomonitoring. This shortfall is due to several scientific and methodological reasons, including a global lack of harmonisation. In this context, the main aim of this paper is to present an overview of the basic principles, promises and challenges of suspect and non-targeted screening approaches applied to human samples as this specific field introduce major specificities compared to other fields. Focused on liquid chromatography coupled to HRMS-based data acquisition methods, this overview addresses all steps of these new analytical workflows. Beyond this general picture, the main activities carried out on this topic within the particular framework of the European Human Biomonitoring initiative (project HBM4EU, 2017-2021) are described, with an emphasis on harmonisation measures.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Chemical of emerging concern; High resolution mass spectrometry; Metabolites; Non-targeted screening; Suspect screening

Year:  2020        PMID: 32361063     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Bay following a large-scale industrial fire using ion-mobility-spectrometry-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alan Valdiviezo; Noor A Aly; Yu-Syuan Luo; Alexandra Cordova; Gaston Casillas; MaKayla Foster; Erin S Baker; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 5.565

2.  Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization.

Authors:  James P McCord; Louis C Groff; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  Environmental risk factors of type 2 diabetes-an exposome approach.

Authors:  Joline W J Beulens; Maria G M Pinho; Taymara C Abreu; Nicole R den Braver; Thao M Lam; Anke Huss; Jelle Vlaanderen; Tabea Sonnenschein; Noreen Z Siddiqui; Zhendong Yuan; Jules Kerckhoffs; Alexandra Zhernakova; Milla F Brandao Gois; Roel C H Vermeulen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.

Authors:  Marc A Beal; Matthew Gagne; Sunil A Kulkarni; Grace Patlewicz; Russell S Thomas; Tara S Barton-Maclaren
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  Chemical Mixtures in the EU Population: Composition and Potential Risks.

Authors:  Sebastian Socianu; Stephanie K Bopp; Eva Govarts; Liese Gilles; Jurgen Buekers; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Thomas Backhaus; Antonio Franco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Nontargeted Analysis Study Reporting Tool: A Framework to Improve Research Transparency and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Katherine T Peter; Allison L Phillips; Ann M Knolhoff; Piero R Gardinali; Carlos A Manzano; Kelsey E Miller; Manuel Pristner; Lyne Sabourin; Mark W Sumarah; Benedikt Warth; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 8.008

7.  Chemical Characterization of Recycled Consumer Products Using Suspect Screening Analysis.

Authors:  Charles N Lowe; Katherine A Phillips; Kristin A Favela; Alice Y Yau; John F Wambaugh; Jon R Sobus; Antony J Williams; Ashley J Pfirrman; Kristin K Isaacs
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 8.  The Exposome and Toxicology: A Win-Win Collaboration.

Authors:  Robert Barouki; Karine Audouze; Christel Becker; Ludek Blaha; Xavier Coumoul; Spyros Karakitsios; Jana Klanova; Gary W Miller; Elliott J Price; Denis Sarigiannis
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.109

9.  Network Analysis to Identify Communities Among Multiple Exposure Biomarkers Measured at Birth in Three Flemish General Population Samples.

Authors:  Ilse Ottenbros; Eva Govarts; Erik Lebret; Roel Vermeulen; Greet Schoeters; Jelle Vlaanderen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 10.  Operationalizing the Exposome Using Passive Silicone Samplers.

Authors:  Zoe Coates Fuentes; Yuri Levin Schwartz; Anna R Robuck; Douglas I Walker
Journal:  Curr Pollut Rep       Date:  2022-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.