| Literature DB >> 32357416 |
Petros Kokkinos1, Dionissios Mantzavinos1, Danae Venieri2.
Abstract
Water resources contamination has a worldwide impact and is a cause of global concern. The need for provision of clean water is becoming more and more demanding. Nanotechnology may support effective strategies for the treatment, use and reuse of water and the development of next-generation water supply systems. The excellent properties and effectiveness of nanomaterials make them particularly suitable for water/wastewater treatment. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the main categories of nanomaterials used in catalytic processes (carbon nanotubes/graphitic carbon nitride (CNT/g-C3N4) composites/graphene-based composites, metal oxides and composites, metal-organic framework and commercially available nanomaterials). These materials have found application in the removal of different categories of pollutants, including pharmaceutically active compounds, personal care products, organic micropollutants, as well as for the disinfection of bacterial, viral and protozoa microbial targets, in water and wastewater matrices. Apart from reviewing the characteristics and efficacy of the aforementioned nanoengineered materials for the removal of different pollutants, we have also recorded performance limitations issues (e.g., toxicity, operating conditions and reuse) for their practical application in water and wastewater treatment on large scale. Research efforts and continuous production are expected to support the development of eco-friendly, economic and efficient nanomaterials for real life applications in the near future.Entities:
Keywords: carbon based; catalytic processes; composites; degradation; disinfection; graphene; metal organic frameworks; metal oxides; microorganisms; nanomaterials; pharmaceuticals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32357416 PMCID: PMC7248945 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25092016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Different categories of nanomaterials presented in the present review (carbon nanotubes/graphitic carbon nitride (CNT/g-C3N4) composites/graphene-based composites, metal oxides and composites, metal organic frameworks and commercially available nanomaterials).
Figure 2Water contaminants of emerging concern.
Selected publications on the development and application of carbon nanotubes, graphitic carbon nitride (CNT/g-C3N4) nanomaterials for advanced water treatment.
| Nanomaterial | Name | Mechanism | Target | Light Irradiation | Efficiency | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ni−Ti Layered Double Hydroxide@Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheet | g-C3N4@Ni−Ti LDH NCs | Photocatalytic/ | Antibiotics (amoxicillin-AMX) | Visible | 99.5% AMX degradation within 75 min | [ |
| Magnetic Fe3O4/multi-walled carbon nanotubes | Fe3O4/MWCNT | Catalytic wet peroxide oxidation | Diclofenac (DCF) | 95% DCF removal after 3 h | [ | |
| Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets | g-C3N4 | Photocatalytic | Fluazaindolizine (FZDL) | Simulated sunlight | 86% FZDL degradation after 18 h | [ |
| Carbon quantum dots-modified porous g-C3N4 | CQDs modified g-C3N4 | Photocatalytic | Diclofenac (DCF) | Visible | 15 times greater degradation than with pure g-C3N4 | [ |
| Multi wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT)/TiO2 nano-composite | MWCNT/TiO2 | Photocatalytic | Tetracyclin (TC) | UVC | TC removal after 100 min. 83% mineralization after 300 min. COD and TOCremoval of 84.9% and 82.3% for realpharmaceutical wastewater in 240 min. | [ |
| Pd–Cu alloy NPs embedded in hollow octahedral N-doped porous carbon | Pd–Cu@HONPC | Catalytic oxidation | Hydrocarbons | Highest conversion of 89% for fluorene | [ | |
| Ti/RuO2–TiO2 electrode in the presence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) | Ti/RuO2–TiO2/MWCNTs | Electrocatalytic | Diclofenac (DCF) | 99.8% DCF removal at 20 mA/cm2, current density | [ |
Selected publications on graphene based composites for the treatment of emerging water micropollutants and pathogens.
| Name/Nanomaterial | Method of Preparation | Target | Matrix | Light Irradiation | Efficiency | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe(VI)-Fe3O4/GE system | co-precipitation method | ciprofloxacin | simulated water | visible light | 98.5% of ciprofloxacin | [ |
| silver decorated grapheme oxide (Ag/GO) composite | reduction process |
| aqueous solution | external light source (35 W Xenon lamp with emission spectra similar to the solar spectrum) | best sterilization under visible light for 60 min; bactericidal rate of 81.2–97.7% | [ |
| SnO2-doped nanocomposites (SnO2 used as a dopant in sulphonated GO and CNT) | hydrothermal method | TSB petri plates/disc diffusion method | visible light | photocatalytic SnO2-doped nanocomposites induced 50% antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| Ag NPs/GA composite homogenously loaded on graphene aerogel (GA) | hydrothermal method | deionized water | none | bactericidal performance for 8–lg of | [ | |
| nano zinc oxide incorporated graphene oxide/nanocellulose (ZnO-GO/NC) nano composite | GO by modified Hummers and Offman’s | ciprofloxacin | aqueous solution (and superficial water samples) | visible light | maximum degradation efficiency of 98% for ciprofloxacin | [ |
| nickel doped CdS nanoparticles anchored on graphene nanosheets (G-NiCdS) | microwave-furnace assisted method | cephalexin and sulfamethoxazole | aqueous solution | visible light | cephalexin almost eliminated within 180 min (95%); sulfamethoxazole removed to (95%) within 240 min by G-NiCdS | [ |
Selected publications on metal organic frameworks (MOFs)-based nanomaterials for the treatment of emerging water micropollutants and pathogens.
| Name/Nanomaterial | Method of Preparation | Target | Light Irradiation | Efficiency | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yolk-shell Co3O4@MOFs nanoreactor | one-pot solvothermal method | 4-chlorophenol | none | almost 100% within 60 min (in the presence of peroxymonosulfate) | [ |
| UiO-66@AgI | solvothermal method/in situ growth method | sulfamethoxazole | visible light | 99.6% of the sulfamethoxazole (5 ppm) in 20 min | [ |
| Pd@MIL-100(Fe) nanocomposite | alcohol reduction | ibuprofen, theophylline and bisphenol A | visible light | ibuprofen (69.2), theophylline (45.2) and bisphenol A (20.5) | [ |
| core–shell In2S3@MIL-125(Ti) (MLS) photocatalytic adsorbent | solvothermal method | tetracycline | visible light | photodegradation efficiency of 63.3% | [ |
| Fe-based metal organic framework (MOF) | hydrothermalmethod | sulfamethoxazole, and additionally carbamazepine, cephalexin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline (in real wastewater matrices) | visible light | 98.9% for sulfamethoxazole (>90% in different wastewater conditions) | [ |
| metal organic | hydrothermal | sulfamethazine | none | 100% within 3 h | [ |
| MIL-101(Fe)@TiO2 | solvothermal method | tetracycline | solar light | 92.76% and 93.8% in 10 min | [ |
| polylactic acid (PLA) fibers containing Co-SIM-1, a cobalt-based substituted | electrospinning | none | higher sensitivity of | [ | |
| Four mixed Ti-Zr-MOFs (TiZr15, TiZr30, TiZr60, TiZr80) by partial | solvothermal method | acetaminophen | solar light | crystalline TiZr15 yielded the highest activity (100% of acetaminophen after 90 min) | [ |
| [Zn2(fum)2(bpy)] and [Zn4O(bdc)3] (fum = fumaric acid; bpy = 21 | solid state approach | amodiaquine drug | none | maximum adsorption capacities for amodiaquine of 0.478 and 47.62 mg/g on the [Zn2(fum)2(bpy)] and [Zn4O(bdc)3] MOFs, respectively | [ |