Literature DB >> 32355622

The Value of a Modified Wiltse Approach for Deformity Correction in Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

David Christopher Kieser1, Chrishan Thakar2, Gregory Cunningham2, Hrvoje Vidakovic1, Niels Hammer3, Colin Nnadi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wiltse approaches have been shown to reduce operative blood loss and enhance recovery in lumbar spinal surgery; however, their efficacy in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) deformity correction has never been assessed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of deformity correction requiring pelvic fixation in NMS performed through a Wiltse approach in contrast to a standard midline approach.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 24 consecutive children with NMS undergoing deformity correction by a single surgeon in our institution. Patient demographic data, operative time, blood loss, curve correction, length of stay, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: In 16 children, the procedure was performed through a Wiltse approach and in 8 through a midline approach. There was no significant difference in age, sex, preoperative Cobb angle, or number of levels fused. Patients who underwent a Wiltse approach had significantly less blood loss yet similar curve correction. The hospital length of stay and complication rate were not significantly different between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A modified Wiltse approach can be safely used for NMS deformity correction. This approach achieves similar curve corrections to a traditional midline approach with less blood loss and no need for iliac screw connectors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wiltse; iliac screw; neuromuscular; scoliosis; spinal fusion; spine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355622      PMCID: PMC7188105          DOI: 10.14444/7023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: Galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws.

Authors:  Michael W Peelle; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A comparison of the Wiltse versus midline approaches in degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  John T Street; R Andrew Glennie; Nicolas Dea; Christian DiPaola; Zhi Wang; Michael Boyd; Scott J Paquette; Brian K Kwon; Marcel F Dvorak; Charles G Fisher
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-04-22

Review 3.  Management of neuromuscular scoliosis.

Authors:  R E McCarthy
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  A Comparison of Early Clinical and Radiographic Complications of Iliac Screw Fixation Versus S2 Alar Iliac (S2AI) Fixation in the Adult and Pediatric Populations.

Authors:  Haariss Ilyas; Howard Place; Aki Puryear
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-05

5.  Brace treatment in neuromuscular spine deformity.

Authors:  Y Olafsson; H Saraste; Z Al-Dabbagh
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation.

Authors:  Arash Emami; Vedat Deviren; Sigurd Berven; Jason A Smith; Serena S Hu; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Iliac screw fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis.

Authors:  Jonathan H Phillips; James P Gutheil; D Raymond Knapp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The sacroiliac joint: a potential cause of pain after lumbar fusion to the sacrum.

Authors:  Victor Katz; Jerome Schofferman; James Reynolds
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-02

9.  Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kee-Yong Ha; Jun-Seok Lee; Ki-Won Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron; Robert S Bray
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.