Literature DB >> 32354954

Evaluation of the Differences Between Measurements in Multiple Institutions and Calculation Modeled by Representative Beam Data in Prostate VMAT Plan.

Hironao Goto1, Hirokazu Mizuno2, Yuichi Akino3, Masaru Isono4, Yoshihiro Tanaka5, Norihisa Masai6, Toshijiro Yamamoto7, Masahiko Koizumi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to investigate the potential differences between multi-institutional measurements and treatment planning system (TPS) calculation modeled by representative beam data for patient-specific quality assurance (QA), including multi-leaf collimator (MLC) parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven TrueBeam from nine institutions were used in this study. Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plan for verification was created using Eclipse. The point dose of the CC13 ionization chamber and the dose distribution of the GAFCHROMIC EBT3 film were measured and analyzed.
RESULTS: Point dose differences in patient-specific QA provided a mean±standard deviation of 1.0%±0.6%. Mean gamma pass rates of dose distribution were in excess of 99% and 96% for 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm gamma criteria, respectively.
CONCLUSION: There was good agreement between measurements and calculations, indicating the small influence of complex VMAT in the underlying processes. Therefore, implementation of the same MLC parameters on TPS among different institutions with the same planning policy should be considered to ensure consistency and efficiency in radiation treatment processes. Copyright
© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MLC transmission; Treatment planning system; dose distribution; dosimetric leaf gap; irradiation; volumetric arc therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32354954      PMCID: PMC7279782          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  21 in total

1.  Delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional multileaf collimator: comparison of dynamic and segmental methods.

Authors:  C S Chui; M F Chan; E Yorke; S Spirou; C C Ling
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Tolerances on MLC leaf position accuracy for IMRT delivery with a dynamic MLC.

Authors:  Alejandra Rangel; Peter Dunscombe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  T LoSasso; C S Chui; C C Ling
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Commissioning and dosimetric characteristics of TrueBeam system: composite data of three TrueBeam machines.

Authors:  Zheng Chang; Qiuwen Wu; Justus Adamson; Lei Ren; James Bowsher; Hui Yan; Andrew Thomas; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Verification of dosimetric accuracy on the TrueBeam STx: rounded leaf effect of the high definition MLC.

Authors:  Kayla N Kielar; Ed Mok; Annie Hsu; Lei Wang; Gary Luxton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Commissioning of the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  C Glide-Hurst; M Bellon; R Foster; C Altunbas; M Speiser; M Altman; D Westerly; N Wen; B Zhao; M Miften; I J Chetty; T Solberg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Technical Report: Reference photon dosimetry data for Varian accelerators based on IROC-Houston site visit data.

Authors:  James R Kerns; David S Followill; Jessica Lowenstein; Andrea Molineu; Paola Alvarez; Paige A Taylor; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The sliding slit test for dynamic IMRT: a useful tool for adjustment of MLC related parameters.

Authors:  I Chauvet; A Petitfils; C Lehobey; J Y Kristner; Y Brunet; R Lembrez; G Gaboriaud; A Mazal; S Zefkili; J C Rosenwald
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of prostate radiotherapy: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  David Palma; Emily Vollans; Kerry James; Sandy Nakano; Vitali Moiseenko; Richard Shaffer; Michael McKenzie; James Morris; Karl Otto
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Commissioning measurements for photon beam data on three TrueBeam linear accelerators, and comparison with Trilogy and Clinac 2100 linear accelerators.

Authors:  Gloria P Beyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.