Literature DB >> 32354332

Heme metabolism genes Downregulated in COPD Cachexia.

Ava C Wilson1,2, Preeti L Kumar2, Sool Lee3, Margaret M Parker3, Itika Arora2, Jarrett D Morrow3, Emiel F M Wouters4, Richard Casaburi5, Stephen I Rennard6,7, David A Lomas8, Alvar Agusti9,10, Ruth Tal-Singer11, Mark T Dransfield2, J Michael Wells2, Surya P Bhatt2, George Washko12, Victor J Thannickal2, Hemant K Tiwari13, Craig P Hersh3,12, Peter J Castaldi3,12, Edwin K Silverman3,12, Merry-Lynn N McDonald14,15,16.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cachexia contributes to increased mortality and reduced quality of life in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and may be associated with underlying gene expression changes. Our goal was to identify differential gene expression signatures associated with COPD cachexia in current and former smokers.
METHODS: We analyzed whole-blood gene expression data from participants with COPD in a discovery cohort (COPDGene, N = 400) and assessed replication (ECLIPSE, N = 114). To approximate the consensus definition using available criteria, cachexia was defined as weight-loss > 5% in the past 12 months or low body mass index (BMI) (< 20 kg/m2) and 1/3 criteria: decreased muscle strength (six-minute walk distance < 350 m), anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dl), and low fat-free mass index (FFMI) (< 15 kg/m2 among women and < 17 kg/m2 among men) in COPDGene. In ECLIPSE, cachexia was defined as weight-loss > 5% in the past 12 months or low BMI and 3/5 criteria: decreased muscle strength, anorexia, abnormal biochemistry (anemia or high c-reactive protein (> 5 mg/l)), fatigue, and low FFMI. Differential gene expression was assessed between cachectic and non-cachectic subjects, adjusting for age, sex, white blood cell counts, and technical covariates. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed using MSigDB.
RESULTS: The prevalence of COPD cachexia was 13.7% in COPDGene and 7.9% in ECLIPSE. Fourteen genes were differentially downregulated in cachectic versus non-cachectic COPD patients in COPDGene (FDR < 0.05) and ECLIPSE (FDR < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Several replicated genes regulating heme metabolism were downregulated among participants with COPD cachexia. Impaired heme biosynthesis may contribute to cachexia development through free-iron buildup and oxidative tissue damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32354332      PMCID: PMC7193359          DOI: 10.1186/s12931-020-01336-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Res        ISSN: 1465-9921


Background

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a leading causes of death worldwide, and it maintains increasing morbidity and mortality [1]. COPD is diagnosed based on reduced, irreversible lung function however, comorbidities are common with COPD and negatively impact survival [2]. Muscle wasting and cachexia are relevant comorbidities among COPD patients with prevalence increasing with stage of illness [2]. Cachexia in COPD may be associated with underlying changes in gene expression that could provide valuable insights for surveillance and drug development. Collectively, there have been limited investigations examining differential gene expression in the context of COPD cachexia. Previous studies of gene expression changes in COPD cachexia have had small sample sizes, non-disease controls for comparison, employed a candidate-gene approach, or have focused on proxies for cachexia such as low fat-free mass index (FFMI) [3, 4]. Nonetheless, these studies have highlighted interesting genes with relevant biology to cachexia such as FOXO1 and FOXO3 [5]. The candidate-gene expression approach is limited to our understanding of known biology. In contrast, the genome-wide method is an agnostic, hypothesis-free approach, that has elucidated novel molecular mechanisms of COPD pathogenesis [6]. A challenge for implementing the genome-wide approach is that a large number of study participants are typically required to achieve a genome-wide level of significance. Although low FFMI and low BMI are components of the multifactorial definition of cachexia, these measures alone are not sufficient to monitor cachexia in the entire population at risk [7]. Our goal was to identify and explore differentially expressed genes associated with COPD cachexia. To achieve our objective, we utilized genome-wide expression data to conduct differential gene expression analyses aimed at deciphering the molecular mechanisms associated with cachexia in COPD patients from COPDGene [8]. We then tested whether significantly differentially expressed genes would be replicated in a second cohort of COPD patients from the ECLIPSE study [9].

Methods

Study design and ethics

Institutional Review Board approval for all analyses was obtained from the University of Alabama at Birmingham and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All subjects included in this analysis provided written informed consent prior to their inclusion in the respective studies mentioned below. All statistical analyses were performed in R (version 3.5.3).

Study populations

For both cohorts, COPD was defined as airflow obstruction using post-bronchodilator spirometry as GOLD grade 2 (FEV1/FVC < 0.7 and 50% < FEV1 < 80% predicted; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second, FEV1/FVC: FEV1 expressed as a percentage of forced vital capacity) or higher [10]. Discovery analyses were performed in 400 participants with COPD from the COPDGene study (NCT00608764; www.copdgene.org). COPDGene is a multicenter, observational study intent on characterizing progression of and genetic susceptibility to COPD, the details of which have been described previously [8]. In brief, COPDGene enrolled Non-Hispanic White and African American current or former smokers, with at least a 10 pack-year smoking history, aged 45 to 80 years to follow longitudinally, with two visits 5 years apart. RNA samples were collected at the five-year follow-up visit. Replication analyses were performed in 114 participants with GOLD 2–4 COPD enrolled in the ECLIPSE (Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints; SCO104960, NCT00292552; www.eclipse-copd.com) cohort. In ECLIPSE, phenotype data was obtained via the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP accession: phs001252.v1.p1) and gene expression data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO: GSE76705). In brief, ECLIPSE [9] was a three-year observational study of subjects with COPD aged 45 to 75 years with a smoking history of ten or more pack-years. Like COPDGene, smaller numbers of control subjects were enrolled in ECLIPSE, who were not included in analysis. Forty-six centers across twelve countries collected data at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and then every 6 months for three years. The main goal of ECLIPSE was to identify biomarkers associated with the progression of disease severity.

Phenotype data

In COPDGene, cachexia was defined at visit two, approximately five years from baseline, as either self-reported, unintentional weight loss greater than 5% in the past year or low BMI (< 20 kg/m2) in addition to one of three criteria: low 6MWD (< 350 m; a surrogate for decreased muscle strength), anemia (hemoglobin< 12 g/dl) or low FFMI (FFMI < 15 kg/m2 among women and FFMI < 17 kg/m2 among men). Low 6MWD and anemia were classified using visit two data. FFMI was derived from an algorithm incorporating pectoralis muscle area on baseline chest computed tomography scans [11]. In ECLIPSE cachexia was defined according to the Evans consensus definition [12] at year 1 of the study as: weight loss greater than 5 % in the past 12 months or low BMI (< 20 kg/m2) and at least three of the five criteria: low six-minute walking distance (a surrogate for decreased muscle strength), anorexia, abnormal biochemistry (anemia or high CRP), fatigue, and low FFMI [12]. FFM was measured using bioelectrical impedance. Low FFMI was defined as < 15 kg/m2 among women and < 17 kg/m2 among men. Abnormal biochemistry was defined as having anemia (hemoglobin< 12 g/dl) or high CRP (> 5 mg/l). Six-minute walking distance (6MWD) < 350 m [13] was used to classify decreased muscle strength [13]. Anorexia and fatigue were only available at baseline and end of study. Anorexia was classified if a participant reported not feeling like eating for 3 or more days in the week prior to either the baseline or 3-year follow-up visit. Fatigue was defined at either baseline or 3-year visits as a FACIT (Function Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) questionnaire score less than 34 [14].

Gene expression data

In COPDGene, RNA-sequencing was performed using whole-blood samples collected at visit 2 (~Year 5) from 400 current or former smokers with COPD. RNA-sequencing alignment and quality control was previously describe in detail [6]. Transcripts were included in analyses if expressed at levels > 1 count per million mapped reads in > 10 subjects. Potential batch effects and unknown artifacts were removed using the SVAseq R package [15] to estimate surrogate variables (SV’s) while accounting for the presence of known covariates: age, sex, library construction batch, and white blood cell (WBC) count percentages. Principle component analysis (PCA) was performed on SV residualized expression data to ensure minimal systematic bias (Supplementary Figure 1). In ECLIPSE, normalized gene expression data was obtained from GEO (GEO: GSE76705). Sample preparation and quality control for gene expression data obtained from ECLIPSE have been previously described [16, 17]. Briefly, gene expression in ECLIPSE was obtained from whole-blood samples collected at baseline and profiled using the Affymetrix Human U133 Plus2 array. Gene expression data were log-transformed, normalized, then background corrected through multi-array averaging and quantile normalization using the affy Bioconductor package [18]. Probes with low variance (< 50%) and those which did not annotate within a specific gene were removed, leaving a dataset of 21,156 probes for analysis in 114 COPD cases. The amount of missing data for each probe was assessed for quality control, and no probes were removed due to missingness, defined as missing in more than 3% of samples.

Differential gene expression analysis

Differential gene expression analysis comparing cachectic and non-cachectic COPD patients from COPDGene was performed using the voom [19] and limma [20] R packages. Linear regression models were fit for each transcript and adjusted to control for age, gender, white blood cell (WBC) percentages, and significant SVs (N = 27). Significance for differentially expressed transcripts in COPDGene was defined as an FDR p-value < 0.05 adjusted for number of transcripts (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Volcano plot of differential gene expression of cachectic vs. non-cachectic COPD patients from COPDGene. The plot shows the log2 fold change on the x-axis and the unadjusted p-value on the y-axis (on the -log10 scale). Blue dots represent genes with a fold changed greater than or equal to + 1 and a p-value < 0.05

Volcano plot of differential gene expression of cachectic vs. non-cachectic COPD patients from COPDGene. The plot shows the log2 fold change on the x-axis and the unadjusted p-value on the y-axis (on the -log10 scale). Blue dots represent genes with a fold changed greater than or equal to + 1 and a p-value < 0.05 In ECLIPSE, only probes mapping to a gene that was significantly differentially expressed in COPDGene were evaluated using linear regression models. A P < 0.05 was considered to be a significant replication in ECLIPSE. Models were adjusted to control for age, gender, and WBC percentages. In instances were multiple probes mapped to a single gene, the probe with the highest mean expression value was selected [21]. Gene overlap enrichment between genes significantly differentially expressed in COPDGene and ECLIPSE were calculated using the GeneOverlap R package [22] using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact to calculate the FDR corrected p-value between overlapping genes.

Pathway analysis

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of genes significantly differentially expressed in COPDGene and for those that replicated in ECLIPSE was performed using the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) v6.1 [23]. This included gene set collections comprised of the hallmark gene set (N = 50 gene sets), curated gene sets (N = 4762 gene sets), Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets (N = 5917 gene sets), oncogenic signatures (N = 189 gene sets), and immunogenic signatures (N = 4872 gene sets). GSEA significance was defined as having an FDR-q p-value less than 0.05.

Results

Demographics

The prevalence of cachexia was 13.7% in COPDGene participants with COPD (Table 1).
Table 1

COPDGene Sample Demographics. Descriptive values for COPD patients (N = 400) in COPDGene with gene expression data by Cachectic (N = 55) and Non-Cachectic (N = 345) co-morbid status. Unless otherwise noted values denote mean (SD)

DemographicCachecticNon-CachecticP-value
N (%)55 (13.7)345 (86.3)
Age68.1 + 9.268.8 + 8.10.52
Sex N(%)0.049
 Male26 (47.3)215 (62.3)
 Female29 (52.7)130 (37.7)
FEV1pp (%)44.0 + 18.154.0 + 18.1< 0.001
Pack Years Smoking46.8 + 19.253.5 + 26.00.027
BMI (kg/m2)22.0 + 4.928.8 + 6.0< 0.001

FEV1pp – Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Percent Predicted, BMI - Body Mass Index, SD – Standard Deviation

COPDGene Sample Demographics. Descriptive values for COPD patients (N = 400) in COPDGene with gene expression data by Cachectic (N = 55) and Non-Cachectic (N = 345) co-morbid status. Unless otherwise noted values denote mean (SD) FEV1pp – Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Percent Predicted, BMI - Body Mass Index, SD – Standard Deviation There was no significant difference between the cachectic and non-cachectic COPD participants in COPDGene in terms of age (Table 1). On average, cachectic COPD subjects were more likely to be female (52.7% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.049), have lower lung function (FEV1% predicted 44.0 + 18.1 vs. 54.0 + 18.1, p < 0.001), and had less intensive smoking histories (46.8 + 19.2 vs. 53.5 + 26.0 pack years, p = 0.027) (Table 1). Cachectic COPD participants had lower BMI compared to non-cachectic COPD participants (22.0 + 4.9 vs 28.8 + 6.0, p < 0.001) (Table 1). As replication analyses were performed using data from the ECLIPSE study, we compared the characteristics of COPD participants included in the analyses in both studies in terms of age, sex, smoking duration, lung function, and BMI (Table 2). There were no significant differences between participants in COPDGene and ECLIPSE in terms of cumulative smoking exposure, lung function (FEV1 percent predicted), and BMI (Table 2). COPD participants in ECLIPSE were slightly younger (64.9 ± 5.3 vs. 68.7 ± 8.2 years, p < 0.05).
Table 2

Sample Demographics. Descriptive values for COPDGene and ECLIPSE subjects with COPD and gene expression data. Unless otherwise noted values denote mean + (SD)

DemographicCOPDGene StudyECLIPSE StudyP-value
N400114
Age68.7 + 8.264.9 + 5.3p < 0.05
Sex N(%)p < 0.05
 Male241(60.3)78 (68.4)
 Female159 (39.7)36 (31.6)
FEV1pp (%)52.7 + 18.450.5 + 15.10.20
Pack Years Smoking52.6 + 25.347.6 + 28.30.08
BMI (kg/m2)27.9 + 6.327.0 + 5.50.11

FEV1pp – Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Percent Predicted, BMI - Body Mass Index, SD – Standard Deviation

Sample Demographics. Descriptive values for COPDGene and ECLIPSE subjects with COPD and gene expression data. Unless otherwise noted values denote mean + (SD) FEV1pp – Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second Percent Predicted, BMI - Body Mass Index, SD – Standard Deviation

Differential gene expression in COPDGene

In COPDGene, 23 transcripts were significantly differentially expressed between cachectic and non-cachectic COPD participants (Table 2). Of these genes, 22 were downregulated among those with COPD cachexia.

Replication in ECLIPSE

In ECLIPSE, only 14 of the 23 significantly differentially expressed genes in COPDGene were measured on the Affymetrix expression array. All of which were also significantly differentially expressed among participants with COPD cachexia in ECLIPSE (Table 3). These genes include ALAS2, ANK1, ASCC2, CDC34, GUCD1, PLEK2, TNS1, SPTB, TRIM58, RILP, PPP2R5B, SMIM24, SLC25A39, and UBXN6 (Table 3). In addition, gene set overlap enrichment analysis of significantly differentially expressed genes in COPDGene and ECLIPSE identified these 14 genes as having a significant overlap (FDR-p = 7.9 × 10− 11).
Table 3

Genes significantly differentially expressed between cachectic1 and non-cachectic COPD

GeneNameCOPDGeneECLIPSE3
Log FCFDR-value2Log FCFDR-value2
ALAS25′-Aminolevulinate Synthase 2− 0.420.015−0.980.00010
ANK1Ankyrin 1, Erythrocytic−0.230.036−0.800.0060
ASCC2Activating Signal Cointegrator 1 Complex Subunit 2−0.210.0074−0.530.012
BACH2BTB Domain and CNC Homolog 2−0.170.0074
CDC34Cell Division Cycle 34−0.220.011−0.580.0066
CSF2RBColony Stimulating Factor 2 Receptor Beta Common Subunit−0.120.036
ENSG00000231393Novel Transcript−0.450.036
ENSG00000236283Novel Transcript−0.680.046
GUCD1Guanylyl Cyclase Domain Containing 1−0.170.0088−0.360.0060
IGHG1Immunoglobulin Heavy Constant Gamma 10.590.0074
MIR186MicroRNA 186−0.480.0074
PLEK2Pleckstrin 2−0.330.044− 1.040.0027
PPP2R5BProtein Phosphatase 2 Regulatory Subunit B’Beta−0.260.012−0.300.012
RILPRab Interacting Lysosomal Protein−0.240.012−0.510.012
RNF149Ring Finger Protein 149−0.0870.0078
SLC25A39Solute Carrier Family 25 Member 39−0.220.0074−0.570.0053
SMIM24Small Integral Membrane Protein 2−0.660.0074−0.710.025
SPTBSpectrin Beta, Erythrocytic−0.330.0074−0.770.0060
TICAM1Toll Like Receptor Adaptor Molecule 10.480.016
TNS1Tensin 1−0.310.018−1.070.0010
TRIM58Tripartite Motif Containing 58−0.340.0074−0.900.0036
TRPM2Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily M Member 20.300.016
UBXN6UBX Domain Protein 6−0.210.032−0.550.012

FC Fold Change

1In COPDGene, cachexia was defined at visit two, approximately five years from baseline, as either unintentional weight loss greater than 5% in the past year or low BMI in addition to one of three criteria: low 6MWD, anemia or low FFMI. Unintentional weight loss was calculated at visit two using self-reported unintentional weight loss in the past year. Low 6MWD and anemia were classified using visit two data. FFMI was derived from pectoralis muscle area on baseline chest computed tomography scans [18]. In ECLIPSE, cachexia was defined as weight loss greater than 5 % in the past 12 months or low BMI and at least three of the five criteria: low six-minute walking distance, anorexia, abnormal biochemistry (anemia or high CRP), fatigue, and low FFMI

2In COPDGene, FDR was calculated based on 65,988 transcripts. In ECLIPSE, FDR was calculated based on N = 14 significantly differently expressed probes present in COPDGene

3Missing values were not significantly replicated in ECLIPSE

Genes significantly differentially expressed between cachectic1 and non-cachectic COPD FC Fold Change 1In COPDGene, cachexia was defined at visit two, approximately five years from baseline, as either unintentional weight loss greater than 5% in the past year or low BMI in addition to one of three criteria: low 6MWD, anemia or low FFMI. Unintentional weight loss was calculated at visit two using self-reported unintentional weight loss in the past year. Low 6MWD and anemia were classified using visit two data. FFMI was derived from pectoralis muscle area on baseline chest computed tomography scans [18]. In ECLIPSE, cachexia was defined as weight loss greater than 5 % in the past 12 months or low BMI and at least three of the five criteria: low six-minute walking distance, anorexia, abnormal biochemistry (anemia or high CRP), fatigue, and low FFMI 2In COPDGene, FDR was calculated based on 65,988 transcripts. In ECLIPSE, FDR was calculated based on N = 14 significantly differently expressed probes present in COPDGene 3Missing values were not significantly replicated in ECLIPSE The 23 differentially expressed genes associated with COPD cachexia in the discovery cohort were significantly enriched for gene sets involved in heme metabolism (Hallmark Heme Metabolism, FDR p-value = 5.92 × 10− 7) and heme biosynthesis (GO Heme Biosynthetic Process, FDR p-value = 3.85 × 10− 2), among others (Table S2). The 14 significantly differentially expressed COPD cachexia genes in the discovery which replicated were enriched with genes involved in heme metabolism (Hallmark Heme Metabolism, FDR-p = 4.50 × 10− 8; ALAS2, ANK1, TNS1, SPTB, TRIM58, PPP2R5) and heme biosynthesis (GO Heme Biosynthetic Process, FDR-p = 2.45 × 10− 2; ALAS2, SLC25A39), among others (Table 4). ASCC2, CDC34, UBXN6, PLEK2, RILP, SMIM24 and GUCD1 were not enriched in any significant pathways.
Table 4

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Genes Associated with COPD Cachexia in COPDGene which replicated in ECLIPSE

Gene Set NameN Genes in SetN Genes OverlapFDR p-value
GSE34205 RSV vs Flu INF Infant PBMC Up20073.27 × 10−10
Hallmark Heme Metabolism20064.50 × 10−8
Valk AML Cluster 72830.00023
GSE34205 Healthy vs RSV INF Infant PBMC Down20040.00067
Chyla CBFA2T3 Targets Down24240.0011
Steiner Erythrocyte Membrane Genes1520.017
GO Heme Biosynthetic Process2020.025
Welch GATA1 Targets2220.025
PRC2 SUZ12 Up V1 Up19130.025
REACTOME Interaction Between L1 AND Ankyrins2320.025
GSE16522 Anti CD3CD28 Stim VS Unstim Memory CD8 T-Cell Up19930.025
Valk AML Cluster 82620.025
GO Tetrapyrrole Biosynthetic Process2720.025
GO Heme Metabolic Process2920.029
GO Porphyrin Containing Compound Metabolic Process3620.041
Hofmann Cell Lymphoma Down3920.046
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of Genes Associated with COPD Cachexia in COPDGene which replicated in ECLIPSE

Discussion

In this study, we identified novel gene expression signatures associated with COPD cachexia in two independent cohorts of participants with moderate to severe COPD. All significant genes were downregulated among cachectic COPD patients. Several of these genes are involved in the regulation of heme metabolism (ALAS2, ANK1, TNS1, SPTB, TRIM58, PPP2R5) and biosynthesis (ALAS2 and SLC25A39). These findings may have implications for cachexia disease surveillance and drug development. Impaired heme metabolism and biosynthesis, decreased hepcidin production, and hemolysis may contribute to COPD cachexia through the induction of iron overloading leading to oxidative tissue damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and aberrant repair (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Summary of key findings in relationship to a putative role of iron in COPD cachexia. Genes in blue are significantly downregulated in COPD cachexia in manuscript analyses

Summary of key findings in relationship to a putative role of iron in COPD cachexia. Genes in blue are significantly downregulated in COPD cachexia in manuscript analyses Disruption of iron homeostasis in lung disease overall has received attention as a potential pathobiological mechanism in COPD [Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 ">24-26]. Recently, Sato et al. [26] reported mice fed an iron deficient diet were more susceptible to cigarette smoke developing severe emphysema and lung hyperinflation. This finding conflicts with an earlier report by Cloonan et al. [25] where mice fed an iron deficient diet or given an iron chelator were less susceptible to cigarette smoke exposure. In keeping with Cloonan et al. [25], our findings may point to a role for iron toxicity through impaired heme biosynthesis and metabolism as a number of genes involved with these processes were downregulated in COPD cachexia (Fig. 2). Heme is an essential component of hemoglobin and anemia is a component of the criteria used to define cachexia. Anemia is a common co-morbidity in COPD [24]. We performed a sensitivity analysis to evaluate whether the 23 genes significantly differentially expressed among subjects with COPD cachexia were also associated with anemia and found no significant association (data not shown). A genome-wide expression study of skeletal muscle biopsies from upper gastro-intestinal cancer patients highlighted ALAS1 as downregulated in patients with cancer cachexia [27]. ALAS2 and ALAS1 encode the same enzyme, 5′-Aminolevuilnnate Synthetase, which plays a key role in heme synthesis [28]. Previous studies have demonstrated that ALAS1 and ALAS2 expression levels are increased during erythropoiesis in healthy individuals [28]. ALAS2 is erythroid-specific whereas ALAS1 is expressed in many tissues, including skeletal muscle. This may indicate defective heme biochemistry has ramifications outside of circulating red blood cells which could be relevant to both cancer and COPD cachexia. SLC25A39 encodes the solute carrier family 25 member 39, a mitochondrial membrane protein which plays a role in iron homeostasis and metabolism [29]. Specifically, SLC25A39 is involved in iron transportation and transfer, and interruptions in SLC25A39 biogenic activity have been shown to result in iron overloading [29]. ANK1 (encodes ankyrin 1) and SPTB (encodes the erythrocytic protein spectrin beta) are involved in erythrocyte membrane stability. Mutations in ANK1 and SPTB have been linked to erythrocyte membrane disorders including hereditary spherocytosis, in which clinically significant iron overload is commonly seen [30]. PPP2R5B (protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B’beta) and TRIM58 (tripartite motif containing 58) function as regulators of erythropoiesis and mutations in these genes can lead to defective erythropoiesis and [31, 32] iron overloading [33]. TNS1 (Tensin 1) plays a role in heme metabolism and functions in the formation of fibrillar adhesion in muscle. Previous studies have identified an association between genetic variants in TNS1 and elevated risk of COPD and lung function decline [34]. Transcriptomic analysis has identified TNS1 as downregulated and differentially expressed in hypoxic alveolar cells [35]. Lung parenchymal destruction in COPD makes it difficult for the body to take in sufficient oxygen and can lead to hypoxemia (low blood oxygen saturation). Hypoxemic COPD patients often present with polycythemia, which suggests increased production of erythrocytes may be one mechanism for the body to maximize delivery of oxygen from the lungs [36]. Downregulation of TNS1 and other genes playing a critical role in heme metabolism could inhibit the body’s ability to effectively sequester the elevated levels of iron produced leading to an excess of iron. In our study, PLEK2 was significantly downregulated in cachectic COPD patients. PLEK2 encodes pleckstrin-2, a protein playing a critical role in the protection of erythroblasts from oxidative damage [37]. Specifically, PLEK2 functions in the structural organization of the erythroblast to prevent the localization of cofilin (an actin-binding protein) to the mitochondria where it induces apoptosis [28, 37]. Previous studies have demonstrated pleckstrin-2 knockout results in erythrocyte apoptosis and inhibition of differentiation, a precursor to cell-free iron loading [37]. Our study indicates downregulation of PLEK2 could result in increased rates of hemolysis resulting in iron overloading (Fig. 2). Hepcidin is essential for sequestering iron in the body and downregulation of hepcidin has been shown to cause severe iron overloading [38]. One gene, GUCD1, was downregulated in cachectic COPD patients. GUCD1 (guanylyl cyclase domain containing 1) is a ubiquitous protein that plays a role in regulating the growth of liver cells [39]. Hepcidin, produced in liver cells, degrades ferroprotein, which is responsible for releasing iron from cells [38]. Downregulation of GUCD1 in our study may suggest one mechanism of iron-overloading due to impaired hepcidin production (Fig. 2). Iron overload due to inhibited iron metabolism has been implicated in increased production of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress [24]. Interestingly, mitochondrial dysfunction is one mechanism thought to contribute to the development of muscle wasting and dysfunction in COPD via buildup of oxidative stress [2]. In our study, the downregulation of genes involved in heme metabolism and biosynthesis, hepcidin production, and erythrocyte membrane stability may contribute to iron-overloading. Iron overloading has been implicated in the generation of mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage, which are hallmarks of COPD cachexia pathogenesis (Fig. 2) [40]. Our study has several strengths and limitations. A strength of our study is that it presents the largest genome-wide expression study of cachexia in patients with COPD. We took advantage of a genome-wide approach which highlighted new candidate genes associated with COPD cachexia such as those involved with heme biochemistry. Another strength of our study was our ability to phenotype cachexia in our replication cohort (ECLIPSE) according to the criteria from the cachexia consensus definition [12], whereas previous studies have focused on COPD cachexia-associated proxy traits such as low FFMI or low BMI that lack specificity. Finally, we were also able to replicate 14 genes as a potential markers of COPD cachexia in an independent cohort of participants with COPD. Among the limitations, we were not able to test whether all 23 significantly differentially regulated genes in COPDGene replicated in ECLIPSE due to limitations with the microarray not having probes for all 23 genes. It is possible some of these genes would also replicate but requires further study in a COPD cohort with RNA-sequencing data. There was also limited phenotype data available to characterize cachexia in COPDGene to code the 5 criteria of the consensus definition; thus, we used the maximal set available. As not all criteria were available to categorize cachexia using the Evans consensus definition, participants with COPD may have been miscategorized. However, the criteria we used to classify cachexia in ECLIPSE were much more stringent and we replicated 14/23 findings. Further, unintentional weight loss in COPDGene was self-reported, which can be unreliable. We also dichotomized 6MWD (6MWD < 350 m) as a surrogate for muscle strength which could have misclassified some participants. Although it is reasonable to infer participants with very low 6MWD have low muscle strength, other factors such as cardiac and pulmonary function may affect 6MWD. We also analyzed gene expression data generated at a single time point. A longitudinal analysis would have provided a deeper and more powerful understanding of the changes in gene expression over time. Future analyses could prove useful in understanding the changes that occur over time in cachectic COPD patients and even prior to the development of cachexia to define at-risk populations. Also, we did not use qRT-PCR to validate significant findings from COPDGene However, our discovery analyses were performed with a fairly large sample size of 400 COPD subjects with replication in an independent cohort of COPD subjects. Finally, peripheral blood was used to evaluate gene expression in cachectic COPD subjects as opposed to skeletal muscle. However, our study replicates abovementioned findings using skeletal muscle biopsies to evaluate gene expression in patients with cancer cachexia [27]. Additionally, a peripheral blood sample is less invasive than a skeletal muscle biopsy, an important factor to consider due to the advanced age and accompanying frailty in COPD patients [1].

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the utility of genome-wide expression analyses to identify novel molecular genes and pathways associated with COPD cachexia. Specifically, our results indicated genes involved in heme biosynthesis and metabolism were significantly downregulated in cachectic patients with COPD. These results highlight impaired heme metabolism and biosynthesis as potential mechanisms for COPD cachexia pathogenesis via free iron build up, oxidative tissue damage, and aberrant repair. Further studies are warranted to determine potential efficacy of therapeutic targeting to prevent, attenuate, or even possibly reverse COPD cachexia. Additional file 1: Table S1. ECLIPSE Sample Demographics. Descriptive values for COPD patients (N = 114) in ECLIPSE with gene expression data by Cachectic (N = 9) and Non-Cachectic (N = 105) co-morbid status. Unless otherwise noted values denote mean (SD). Table S2. Gene set enrichment analysis of 23 significantly (FDR p-value < 0.05) differentially expressed between cachectic and non-cachectic COPD patients in COPDGene. Additional file 2: Figure S1. Principle component analysis on SV residualized expression data of (N = 400) COPDGene subjects with COPD. Principal component 1 (PC1) is presented on the x-axis and the second principle component on the y-axis (PC2) after adjustment for significant surrogate variables (N = 27). Numbers in parentheses denotes the proportion of variance captured by each component. Red dots indicate COPD subjects with cachexia. Blue dots indicate COPD subjects without cachexia.
  39 in total

1.  Tangled up in red: intertwining of the heme and iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis pathways.

Authors:  Tracey A Rouault; Wing-Hang Tong
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 27.287

2.  Validation and comparison of reference equations for the 6-min walk distance test.

Authors:  C G Cote; C Casanova; J M Marín; M V Lopez; V Pinto-Plata; M M de Oca; L J Dordelly; H Nekach; B R Celli
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 3.  The pathophysiology of cachexia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Annemie M W J Schols; Harry R Gosker
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.302

4.  Cachexia: a new definition.

Authors:  William J Evans; John E Morley; Josep Argilés; Connie Bales; Vickie Baracos; Denis Guttridge; Aminah Jatoi; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Herbert Lochs; Giovanni Mantovani; Daniel Marks; William E Mitch; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Armine Najand; Piotr Ponikowski; Filippo Rossi Fanelli; Morrie Schambelan; Annemie Schols; Michael Schuster; David Thomas; Robert Wolfe; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria with FACT-F and VAS for cancer-related fatigue: proposal for use as a screening tool.

Authors:  Simon Van Belle; Robert Paridaens; Georges Evers; Joseph Kerger; Dominique Bron; Jan Foubert; Gerrit Ponnet; Didier Vander Steichel; Christine Heremans; Dominique Rosillon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Strategies for aggregating gene expression data: the collapseRows R function.

Authors:  Jeremy A Miller; Chaochao Cai; Peter Langfelder; Daniel H Geschwind; Sunil M Kurian; Daniel R Salomon; Steve Horvath
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Altered gene expression in blood and sputum in COPD frequent exacerbators in the ECLIPSE cohort.

Authors:  Dave Singh; Steven M Fox; Ruth Tal-Singer; Stewart Bates; John H Riley; Bartolome Celli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  It's more than low BMI: prevalence of cachexia and associated mortality in COPD.

Authors:  Merry-Lynn N McDonald; Emiel F M Wouters; Erica Rutten; Richard Casaburi; Stephen I Rennard; David A Lomas; Marcas Bamman; Bartolome Celli; Alvar Agusti; Ruth Tal-Singer; Craig P Hersh; Mark Dransfield; Edwin K Silverman
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2019-05-22

9.  Increased expression of H19/miR-675 is associated with a low fat-free mass index in patients with COPD.

Authors:  Amy Lewis; Jen Y Lee; Anna V Donaldson; S Amanda Natanek; Srividya Vaidyanathan; William D-C Man; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Avan A Sayer; Harnish P Patel; Cyrus Cooper; Holly Syddall; Michael I Polkey; Paul R Kemp
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 12.910

10.  RNA sequencing identifies novel non-coding RNA and exon-specific effects associated with cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Margaret M Parker; Robert P Chase; Andrew Lamb; Alejandro Reyes; Aabida Saferali; Jeong H Yun; Blanca E Himes; Edwin K Silverman; Craig P Hersh; Peter J Castaldi
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.063

View more
  1 in total

1.  Iron Depletion in Systemic and Muscle Compartments Defines a Specific Phenotype of Severe COPD in Female and Male Patients: Implications in Exercise Tolerance.

Authors:  Maria Pérez-Peiró; Mariela Alvarado; Clara Martín-Ontiyuelo; Xavier Duran; Diego A Rodríguez-Chiaradía; Esther Barreiro
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 6.706

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.