| Literature DB >> 32353929 |
Xiubing Gao1,2,3, Can Guo2, Ming Li1,3, Rongyu Li1,3, Xiaomao Wu1,3, Anlong Hu1,3, Xianfeng Hu1,3, Feixu Mo1,3, Shuai Wu1,3.
Abstract
The brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Stål), is the most notorious rice insect pest. In order to repel BPH effectively while being environmentally friendly, a new film based on guar gum incorporated with citral (GC film) was formulated. A toxicity bioassay of citral and guar gum at different proportions (ratios of 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3 in w/w) of GC film-forming emulsion to BPH was performed with the rice stem dipping method. Results showed that the most effective ratio of citral to guar gum was 1:1 with the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 4.30 mg/mL, far below the LC50 of guar gum (GG)/citral individual (141.51 and 44.38 mg/mL, respectively). The mortality of BPH adults and nymphs in the third instar treated with different dilution multiples of GC film-forming emulsion ranged from 46.67% to 82.22% and from 37.78% to 71.11%, respectively. These indicated that GC film-forming emulsion had a direct toxicity on BPH, and the mixture of citral and GG had synergistic interactions. Subsequently, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy showed that the incorporation of guar gum with citral was successful and did not result in the formation of new chemical bonds. The GC film exhibited a darker color and rougher surface topography with larger apertures and deeper gullies (Ra = 1.42 nm, Rq = 2.05 nm, and Rmax = 25.40 nm) compared to the guar gum film (GG film) (Ra = 1.00 nm, Rq = 1.33 nm, and Rmax = 16.40 nm), as determined by transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The GC film exhibited a 50.4% lower solubility in water (30.30% vs. 15.00%) and 71.3% oxygen permeability (8.26 × 10-9 vs. 2.37 × 10-9 cm3/m2·d·Pa) (p < 0.05) but did not demonstrate any significant difference in mechanical properties, such as thickness (39.10 vs. 41.70 mm), tensile strength (41.89 vs. 38.30 N/mm2), and elongation at break (1.82% vs. 2.03%) (p < 0.05) compared to the GG film. Our findings established a link between physicochemical properties and bioactivity, which can provide useful information on developing and improving GC films and may offer an alternative approach for the control of BPH in the near future.Entities:
Keywords: Nilaparvata lugens; bioactivity; citral; film; guar gum; physicochemical properties
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32353929 PMCID: PMC7249019 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25092044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Median lethal concentration (LC50) of different ratios of citral and guar gum in GC film emulsions to 3rd-instar nymph of BPH.
| Ratio of Citral and Guar Gum | Total Number of Nymphs Treated | Toxicity Regression Equations (Y) | Correlation Coefficient (r) | LC50 (95% Confidence Interval) (mg/mL) | Chi-Square Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3:1 | 225 | y = 4.262 + 0.981x | 0.980 | 5.65 (2.58−12.39) | 0.8397 |
| 2:1 | 225 | y = 4.262 + 0.867x | 0.992 | 7.11 (2.48−20.40) | 0.2124 |
| 1:1 | 225 | y = 4.475 + 0.828x | 0.976 | 4.30 (1.64−11.31) | 0.6948 |
| 1:2 | 225 | y = 3.782 + 1.334x | 0.998 | 8.19 (2.98−22.47) | 0.0514 |
| 1:3 | 225 | y = 4.014 + 0.830x | 0.976 | 15.43 (3.12−76.21) | 0.6044 |
| citral | 225 | y = 3.769 + 0.748x | 0.978 | 44.38 (2.06−954.28) | 0.3503 |
| GG | 225 | y = 3.483 + 0.705x | 0.957 | 141.51 (3.72−5387.85) | 0.6624 |
Figure 1Mortality of (A) BPH adults and (B) BPH nymphs in the 3rd instar treated with different dilution multiples of film-forming emulsion. Value is mean ± SE (n = 3). The means followed by the same letter in the bar diagram are not significantly different according to ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (p < 0.05).
Figure 2FTIR spectra of the (A) GC film-forming emulsion, (B) guar gum (GG) film-forming emulsion, and (C) pure guar gum.
Figure 3Visual observation of the different kinds of films. The figures were evaluated by a digital still camera (Canon and Nikon, Japan): (A) GC film, (B) GG film.
Figure 4Microstructural features of the different types of films. Depth-of-field stereoscopic three-dimensional microscopy of (A) GC film and (B) GG film. SEM micrographs of films of (C,c) GC film and (D,d) GG film.
Figure 5AFM images of the different types of films. The scanning scale is 1.0 × 1.0 μm. (A,C) GC film, H was planar and J was triaxial. (B,D) GG film, I was planar and K was triaxial.
The physicochemical properties of different types of films.
| Film Type | Mechanical Properties | Physical Properties | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness (mm) | TS (N/mm2) | EAB (%) | SOW (%) | OP (×10−9cm3/m2·d·Pa) | |
| GG film | 39.10 ± 2.80 a | 41.89 ± 1.96 a | 1.82 ± 0.38 a | 30.30 ± 0.26 a | 8.26 ± 0.38 a |
| GC film | 41.70 ± 2.30 a | 38.30 ± 1.40 a | 2.03 ± 0.49 a | 15.00 ± 0.23 b | 2.37 ± 0.21 b |
Note: The values are displayed as mean ± SE (n = 5). Same superscript letters in the same column are not significantly different (p > 0.05). GG film: Guar gum film; GC film: Guar gum-based film incorporated with citral; TS: Tensile strength; EAB: Elongation at break; SOW: Solubility in water of film; OP: Oxygen permeability of film.