Kun Miao1, Lu Wei1. 1. Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States.
Abstract
Polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases are a group of neurodegenerative disorders, involving the deposition of aggregation-prone proteins with long polyQ expansions. However, the cytotoxic roles of these aggregates remain highly controversial, largely due to a lack of proper tools for quantitative and nonperturbative interrogations. Common methods including in vitro biochemical, spectroscopic assays, and live-cell fluorescence imaging all suffer from certain limitations. Here, we propose coupling stimulated Raman scattering microscopy with deuterium-labeled glutamine for live-cell imaging, quantification, and spectral analysis of native polyQ aggregates with subcellular resolution. First, through the enrichment of deuterated glutamine in the polyQ sequence of mutant Huntingtin (mHtt) exon1 proteins for Huntington's disease, we achieved sensitive and specific stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging of carbon-deuterium bonds (C-D) from aggregates without GFP labeling, which is commonly employed in fluorescence microscopy. We revealed that these aggregates became 1.8-fold denser compared to those with GFP. Second, we performed ratiometric quantifications, which indicate a surprising dependence of protein compositions on aggregation sizes. Our further calculations, for the first time, reported the absolute concentrations for sequestered mHtt and non-mHtt proteins within the same aggregates. Third, we adopted hyperspectral SRS for Raman spectroscopic studies of aggregate structures. By inducing a cellular heat shock response, a potential therapeutic approach for inhibiting aggregate formation, we found a possible aggregate intermediate state with changed solvation microenvironments. Our method may hence readily unveil new features and mechanistic insight of polyQ aggregates and pave the way for comprehensive in vivo investigations.
Polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases are a group of neurodegenerative disorders, involving the deposition of aggregation-prone proteins with long polyQ expansions. However, the cytotoxic roles of these aggregates remain highly controversial, largely due to a lack of proper tools for quantitative and nonperturbative interrogations. Common methods including in vitro biochemical, spectroscopic assays, and live-cell fluorescence imaging all suffer from certain limitations. Here, we propose coupling stimulated Raman scattering microscopy with deuterium-labeled glutamine for live-cell imaging, quantification, and spectral analysis of native polyQ aggregates with subcellular resolution. First, through the enrichment of deuterated glutamine in the polyQ sequence of mutant Huntingtin (mHtt) exon1 proteins for Huntington's disease, we achieved sensitive and specific stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging of carbon-deuterium bonds (C-D) from aggregates without GFP labeling, which is commonly employed in fluorescence microscopy. We revealed that these aggregates became 1.8-fold denser compared to those with GFP. Second, we performed ratiometric quantifications, which indicate a surprising dependence of protein compositions on aggregation sizes. Our further calculations, for the first time, reported the absolute concentrations for sequestered mHtt and non-mHtt proteins within the same aggregates. Third, we adopted hyperspectral SRS for Raman spectroscopic studies of aggregate structures. By inducing a cellular heat shock response, a potential therapeutic approach for inhibiting aggregate formation, we found a possible aggregate intermediate state with changed solvation microenvironments. Our method may hence readily unveil new features and mechanistic insight of polyQ aggregates and pave the way for comprehensive in vivo investigations.
A
hallmark of neurodegenerative disorders is the presence of protein
aggregates in peripheral nerves.[1−4] Among these disorders are polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases,
such as Huntington’s disease (HD), which starts with motor
symptoms like chorea and is followed by memory deficit and depression.[3,4] The onset of HD has been linked to abnormally expanded CAGtrinucleotide
repeats that encode the polyQ sequence in mutant Huntingtin (mHtt)
proteins. While Q repeats are typically fewer than 37 in healthy humans,
they can range from 40 to 250 in Huntington’s patients and
are consistently found in the protein depositions of HD brain slices
by immunohistology.[1,3] However, the pathological roles
of polyQ aggregates still remain elusive.[2,4−6] Recent studies suggest that soluble oligomers are
cytotoxic by dynamically interacting with cytosolic proteins and triggering
apoptosis while aggregates are cytoprotective by sequestering toxic
protein oligomers to form stable inclusion bodies.[4,7,8] In contrast, evidence also indicates that
toxicity of aggregates arises from depleting functional (e.g., chaperones
and transcription factors) and structural (e.g., actin) proteins and
impairing cellular organelles (e.g., ribosomes and endoplasmic reticulum).[9−13]To understand their molecular roles, extensive efforts have
been
made to investigate the compositions, structures, and kinetics of
mHtt aggregates. Conventional biochemical assays and recent quantitative
proteomics offer relative protein compositions of the aggregates in
reference to the soluble protein pools. However, these methods rely
on extensive postprocessing such as aggregation purification and solubilization.[9,10]In vitro spectroscopic studies including IR,[14] UV-resonance Raman,[15,16] NMR spectroscopy,[17] and fluorescence[18,19] on model peptides provide crucial information, but they are limited
to relatively short expansion lengths because of the difficulty in
isolating peptides with long Q repeats.[14−19] More importantly, all these in vitro studies cannot
recapitulate the native aggregation status in live cells. For live-cell
studies, fluorescence imaging offers unprecedented spatial and temporal
resolution, by fusing fluorescent proteins[20] or self-labeling tags (e.g., HaloTag)[21] to the C-terminus of a mHtt exon1 (ex1) sequence (Figure a). The aggregation-prone ex1
fragment, which comprises a 17 N-terminal sequence, a polyQ tract
followed by a proline-rich domain at the C-terminus (Figure a), can effectively induce
the pathological phenotype of HD in the transgenicmouse model and
humans.[4,22] Compared to mHtt ex1, however, green fluorescent
protein (GFP) is much larger in size and has a known tendency to oligomerize.[23] This could perturb the aggregation kinetics
and conformations and may contribute to the controversy of reported
toxicity. Moreover, because the dense aggregation environment often
causes fluorescence quenching,[24] fluorescence
imaging is not ideal for quantitative analysis of aggregates. It is
therefore highly desirable to have a new modality that combines the
advantages from in vitro investigations and fluorescence
imaging while overcoming their limitations.
Figure 1
Experimental scheme for
stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy
with deuterated glutamine (Gln or Q) labeling. (a) Plasmid construct
of a model mutant Huntingtin (mHtt) Exon1 (ex1) protein fused with
GFP at the C terminus. N: N-terminal 17 aa fragment. PolyQ: poly glutamine
region. Pro: proline-rich domain. GFP: green fluorescent protein.
(b) Experimental scheme for SRS imaging of Gln-d5-labeled polyQ aggregates. (c) Spontaneous Raman (blue dashed)
and SRS (green) spectra of 60 mM Gln-d5 solution. (d) Linear dependence of SRS signals (at 2147 cm–1) on Gln-d5 concentrations under a 50
μs time constant. Error bar: SD.
Experimental scheme for
stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy
with deuterated glutamine (Gln or Q) labeling. (a) Plasmid construct
of a model mutant Huntingtin (mHtt) Exon1 (ex1) protein fused with
GFP at the C terminus. N: N-terminal 17 aa fragment. PolyQ: poly glutamine
region. Pro: proline-rich domain. GFP: green fluorescent protein.
(b) Experimental scheme for SRS imaging of Gln-d5-labeled polyQ aggregates. (c) Spontaneous Raman (blue dashed)
and SRS (green) spectra of 60 mM Gln-d5 solution. (d) Linear dependence of SRS signals (at 2147 cm–1) on Gln-d5 concentrations under a 50
μs time constant. Error bar: SD.Here, we report a novel and general platform for live-cell imaging,
quantification, and spectral analysis of polyQ aggregates by stimulated
Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy (Figure S1) of deuterium-labeled glutamine (Gln-d5) (Figure b,c). We
first achieved specific and sensitive SRS imaging of native polyQ
aggregates without the need of large fusion-proteins. We then developed
a ratiometric strategy for quantitative analysis of protein content
in aggregates of varying sizes. Compared to existing methods, our
modality, for the first time, reports the absolute concentrations
of both mHtt and non-mHtt proteins from aggregates in live cells.
Applying the hyperspectral SRS (hSRS), we further probed the aggregate
structures and aggregate–environment interactions upon an induced
heat shock response.
Results
Coupling of SRS Microscopy
with Deuterated Glutamine Is Ideal
for Imaging PolyQ Aggregates
Labeling of aggregates is achieved
through replacing regular Gln in the medium with Gln-d5 (Figure b,c), which would be metabolically incorporated and enriched into
the long polyQ tail of expressed mHtt proteins (Figure a,b). Targeting the vibrational frequency
of carbon–deuterium bonds (C–D), SRS imaging obtains
subcellular mapping of mHtt aggregates in live cells. Our strategy
has the following advantages: First, the vibrational frequency of
C–D in Gln-d5 (Figure c) is in the desired cell-silent
region (1800–2600 cm–1), providing high imaging
specificity without background from endogenous biomolecules. Second,
the nonexchangeable labeling on the C–H side chains of Gln
offers reliable signals. Third, Gln enrichment in the polyQ region
(Figures a) yields
both high labeling specificity and superb SRS imaging sensitivity.
For example, for a widely used mHtt-97Q ex1 protein, Gln accounts
for 68% of the ex1 sequence (Figure S2),
while the natural occurrence of Gln is only 4.2% in human proteomes.[25] Compared to label-free SRS[26] and SRS imaging with 13C-phenyalanine[27] or deuterated all essential amino acids,[28] selective Gln-d5 labeling is significantly more specific for imaging polyQ aggregates.
Fourth, compared to using alkyne-tagged unnatural amino acids, which
only introduces one tag to one copy of a protein,[29] multiple Q labeling (e.g., 103Q for mHtt-97Q ex1) has higher
sensitivity and requires less sample manipulation. Fifth, imaging-wise,
compared to spontaneous Raman,[30] SRS provides
higher detection sensitivity and faster image acquisition with the
stimulated emission quantum amplification principle (Figure S1). Compared to Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering
(CARS),[31] another nonlinear Raman microscopy
technique, SRS, offers high-fidelity Raman spectra (Figure c) and linear concentration
dependence (Figure d) without a nonresonance background.We first determined our
SRS detection limit on Gln-d5 solution
to be 3 mM (Figure d, when signal (S)/noise (N) =
1) by targeting the C–D peak at 2147 cm–1. Hence, our detection limit is as low as 29 μM for mHtt proteins
with a total of 103 Gln in the mHtt-97Q ex1 protein. This strategy
offers higher detection sensitivity compared to previously reported
200 μM by SRS imaging of alkyne tags.[32] In cells, however, the detection limit is set by aggregate-signal
to cellular-background ratio (Sagg/Bcell). There are two sources for Bcell. First, the newly synthesized proteome incorporates
Gln. Since Gln accounts for 4.2% of human proteome,[25] the estimated detectability for mHtt-97Q ex1 is 86 μM
when Sagg/Bcell = 1 (details in the SI). Second, the
intracellular free Gln pool is about 8 mM,[33] slightly lowering the achievable detectability. To minimize this
additional background, we replaced the medium with buffer before imaging.
Although a detection sensitivity of 86 μM may be too high for
imaging normal proteins, it is highly feasible to detect polyQ aggregates
down to very small sizes. Our GFP fluorescence analysis by time-lapse
tracking of mHtt-97Q-GFP proteins (Figure S3a,b) and tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) fluorescence analysis of mHtt-97Q-Halo
proteins (Figure S3c) suggest that once
the new and small aggregates form in cells, the concentration of polyQ
protein is already beyond 86 μM to as high as 400 μM.
Imaging and Quantification of mHtt Aggregates with and without
GFP Labeling in Live HeLa Cells
We next validated our SRS
imaging by transfecting HeLa cells with mHtt-97Q-GFP plasmid (Figure a and Figure S2) and culturing them in Gln-d5 medium. We first conducted parallel SRS and
fluorescence imaging on the same set of live cells. The SRS image
of C–D enriched aggregate (Figure a, 2167 cm–1) agrees well
with the fluorescence image of GFP (Figure a, fluorescence). A clear off-resonance image
demonstrates high SRS imaging quality (Figure a, 2035 cm–1). The C–D
peak for Gln-d5 is shifted from 2147 cm–1 in solution to 2167 cm–1 after
being incorporated into cellular proteins, suggesting a change of
the microenvironment. Indeed, we found that the shifted C–D
spectrum has Raman spectral features from both Gln-d5 solution and solid (peaked at 2167 cm–1) (Figure S4). As a comparison, label-free
SRS images at CH3 (2940 cm–1) and amide
I (1664 cm–1) channels, widely adopted for imaging
total proteins,[26] show much decreased detection
specificity, particularly pronounced for small aggregates (Figure b, arrow indicated),
which are indistinguishable from the nucleoli. Moreover, the high
contrast of the C–D image decreases significantly if Gln-d5 is replaced by nonenriched leucine-d10 (Leu-d10) for
labeling (Figure c).
Our quantification on the average Sagg/Bcell for each channel clearly demonstrated
much higher imaging specificity with Gln-d5 (Figure d).
Figure 2
Live-cell SRS
imaging of mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregates with Gln-d5 labeling. (a) SRS imaging of mHtt aggregates
(arrowheaded, 2167 cm–1, C–D on), validated
by fluorescence imaging through GFP (Fluorescence). Off-resonance
image at 2035 cm–1 shows no signal. (b) Live-cell
SRS images for an mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregate (arrowheaded) at Gln-d5 (2167 cm–1), CH3(2940 cm–1), and amide I (1664 cm–1) channels on the same set of HeLa cells. (c) SRS imaging of an mHtt-97Q-GFP
aggregate at 2143 cm–1 by leucine-d10 (Leu-d10) labeling. (d)
Average Sagg/Bcell from SRS images of C–D with Gln-d5 labeling (5.75 ± 1.03, n = 13); amide I (2.15
± 0.34, n = 4); CH3 (1.66 ±
0.14, n = 10); and C–D with Leu-d10 labeling (2.45 ± 0.33, n = 10).
Error bar: SD.
Live-cell SRS
imaging of mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregates with Gln-d5 labeling. (a) SRS imaging of mHtt aggregates
(arrowheaded, 2167 cm–1, C–D on), validated
by fluorescence imaging through GFP (Fluorescence). Off-resonance
image at 2035 cm–1 shows no signal. (b) Live-cell
SRS images for an mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregate (arrowheaded) at Gln-d5 (2167 cm–1), CH3(2940 cm–1), and amide I (1664 cm–1) channels on the same set of HeLa cells. (c) SRS imaging of an mHtt-97Q-GFP
aggregate at 2143 cm–1 by leucine-d10 (Leu-d10) labeling. (d)
Average Sagg/Bcell from SRS images of C–D with Gln-d5 labeling (5.75 ± 1.03, n = 13); amide I (2.15
± 0.34, n = 4); CH3 (1.66 ±
0.14, n = 10); and C–D with Leu-d10 labeling (2.45 ± 0.33, n = 10).
Error bar: SD.After establishing the feasibility
for SRS imaging of Gln-d5-labeled mHtt-97Q-GFP
aggregates, we aimed
to image native mHtt-97Q proteins without GFP (Figure a). GFP may perturb aggregation formation
of mHtt proteins, because it is 238 amino acid (aa) in length, which
is about twice as large as mHtt-97Q ex1 with only 152 aa. We successfully
imaged aggregates at the same C–D frequency (Figure b, CD on and off). Interestingly,
these aggregates (Figure b, 2167 cm–1) are about twice as bright
as those of similar sizes with GFP labeling (Figure a, 2167 cm–1). Because
the GFP sequence only contains 8 Gln, the C–D intensity should
remain approximately unchanged when deleting GFP. We hence reasoned
that the detected intensity increase is due to the formation of denser
aggregates. A similar phenomenon was recently reported by Cryo-ET
with the same mHtt ex1 sequence.[11] To test
our theory, we acquired amide I images to compare total protein concentrations
between aggregates with and without GFP. If the density remains unchanged,
mHtt-97Q aggregates would have a much lower amide intensity than mHtt-97Q-GFP
because the GFP sequence contributes significantly to amide signals.
We observed similar levels of amide signals between these two types
of aggregates (Figure S5), confirming that
the increase in aggregate density makes up for the signal loss of
deleting GFP. Moreover, mHtt-97Q aggregates become barely distinguishable
from cellular background in the CH3 channel (Figure b, 2940 cm–1), indicating that previous CH3 signals for aggregates
were mainly from the GFP sequence (Figure b, 2940 cm–1, and Figure S2). To prove the high biocompatibility
of our method, we also demonstrated time-lapse SRS imaging on the
same set of live cells to capture the aggregation formation (Figure c). To quantify aggregates
from multiple experimental replicates, we plotted the average Sagg/Bcell in both
C–D and CH channels for mHtt-97Q and mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregates
(Figure d). In the
C–D channel, the Sagg/Bcell for mHtt-97Q aggregates is 1.8-fold higher, confirming
the formation of 1.8-fold denser aggregates without GFP labeling,
as Bcell is not affected by the change
of plasmids. In the C–H channel, the Sagg/Bcell values remain approximately
the same. We further confirmed our high detection specificity of polyQ
aggregates by inducing the formation of stress granules in normal
HeLa cells and confirmed that our SRS imaging with Gln-d5 labeling does not detect these non-polyQ-aggregate-type
of stress granules (Figure S6). Going beyond
mHtt-97Q, we imaged and quantitatively analyzed a shorter Q expansion
sequence, mHtt-46Q, for which the Q number is just above the disease-prone
aggregation threshold (Figure S7). Similarly,
we found that mHtt-46Q aggregates are about 1.6-time denser compared
to those formed by mHtt-46Q-GFP. Moreover, we demonstrated our applicability
of imaging polyQ aggregates in a stable embryonic stem cell-line[34] (Figure S8), paving
the way for more general future applications.
Figure 3
SRS imaging of mHtt-97Q
aggregates without GFP. (a) Plasmid construct
of mHtt-97Q by deleting GFP sequence. (b) SRS images of a Gln-d5-labeled aggregate at C–D on-resonance
(2167 cm–1), C–D off-resonance (2035 cm–1), CH3 (2940 cm–1), and
amide I (1664 cm–1). (c) Time-lapse SRS tracking
at the C–D channel for capturing aggregation formation on the
same set of live cells. (d) Sagg/Bcell of mHtt-97Q (97Q) in C–D (CD, 10.14
± 1.99, n = 11) and CH3 (CH, 1.50
± 0.12, n = 10) channels compared to that for
mHtt-97Q-GFP (97Q-GFP, CD, 5.75 ± 1.03, n =
13; CH, 1.66 ± 0.14, n = 10). (e) CH/CDs for
97Q-GFP (9.79 ± 1.05, n = 7) and 97Q (5.75 ±
0.86, n = 20) aggregates. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Error bar: SD.
SRS imaging of mHtt-97Q
aggregates without GFP. (a) Plasmid construct
of mHtt-97Q by deleting GFP sequence. (b) SRS images of a Gln-d5-labeled aggregate at C–D on-resonance
(2167 cm–1), C–D off-resonance (2035 cm–1), CH3 (2940 cm–1), and
amide I (1664 cm–1). (c) Time-lapse SRS tracking
at the C–D channel for capturing aggregation formation on the
same set of live cells. (d) Sagg/Bcell of mHtt-97Q (97Q) in C–D (CD, 10.14
± 1.99, n = 11) and CH3 (CH, 1.50
± 0.12, n = 10) channels compared to that for
mHtt-97Q-GFP (97Q-GFP, CD, 5.75 ± 1.03, n =
13; CH, 1.66 ± 0.14, n = 10). (e) CH/CDs for
97Q-GFP (9.79 ± 1.05, n = 7) and 97Q (5.75 ±
0.86, n = 20) aggregates. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Error bar: SD.
Ratiometric Quantifications
for the Dependence of Protein Compositions
on Aggregation Sizes
The feature of parallel C–D and
CH3 SRS imaging enables us to perform ratiometric analysis
of CH3-to-CD ratios (CH/CDs) to investigate polyQ aggregate
compositions of non-mHtt and mHtt proteins. This is because the CD
signals are from Gln-d5, which mainly
originates from mHtt proteins, while the CH3 signals represent
non-Gln aa, which come from the combined sources of non-Gln aa in
mHtt proteins and sequestered non-mHtt proteins. We first applied
CH/CD quantifications on both mHtt-97Q-GFP and mHtt-97Q aggregates
(Figure e). Surprisingly,
the average CH/CD remains as high as 5.75 for mHtt-97Q aggregates
(Figure e). If the
aggregates were formed primarily by mHtt proteins, the CH/CD should
be about 0.5 because the mHtt-97Q sequence contains 49 non-Q aa and
103 Q. Similarly, the CH/CD should have decreased by 5-fold from mHtt-97Q-GFP
(289 non-Q aa and 112 Q) to mHtt-97Q aggregates (49 non-Q aa and 103
Q) (Figure S2). Instead, the decrease is
only 1.5-fold (Figure e, 9.79 vs 5.75). Our control experiments confirmed that the Gln-d5 labeling efficiency is close to 100% (i.e., de novo glutamine synthesis for regular Gln is about zero, Figures S9 and S10), indicating that all 103
Q in the mHtt sequence are deuterated. Our results hence imply that
these aggregates contain a rather high percentage of non-mHtt proteins.
Sequestrations and depletions of cellular functional and structural
proteins by aggregates have been suggested to be one underlying mechanism
of HD cytotoxicity.[9−13] Consequently, we calculated the relative molar percentages for mHtt
and non-mHtt proteins in the aggregates. Assuming that the molar percentage
of mHtt and non-mHtt proteins in the aggregates is x and 1 – x, respectively, with known protein
sequences, we can generate an equation with x and
(1 – x) for the relative ratio between non-Gln
aa and Gln-d5 to represent the measurable
of CH/CDs (Figure e) (details in the SI). We calculated
that the average molar percentage of non-mHtt proteins is indeed as
high as 54% for an average CH/CD of 5.75.Now that we have established
that CH/CDs could serve as a direct indicator of aggregation compositions,
we next examined the relationship between CH/CDs and aggregation sizes.
Based on the sequestration theory,[12,13] we expect
that the relationship might offer insight for understanding the molecular
cytotoxicity of polyQ aggregates. Interestingly, we observed a negative
correlation (Figure a, Pearson’s r = −0.56), which indicates
that the percentage of sequestered mHtt proteins increases as the
aggregates grow. As a comparison, such distinctive correlation by
Gln-d5 labeling is absent when replaced
by Leu-d10 labeling (Figure b, Pearson’s r = −0.11), because mHtt and non-mHtt proteins have
similar leucine abundance. This underscores the importance of specific
polyQ labeling to observe such a size–composition correlation.
Figure 4
SRS quantification
for mHtt-97Q aggregates of different sizes.
(a) CH/CDs for Gln-d5-labeled aggregates
present a negative correlation on aggregation areas (Pearson’s
coefficient r = −0.56). (b) Minimum correlation
between CH/CDs for Leu-d10-labeled aggregates
and aggregation areas (Pearson’s coefficient r = −0.11). (c, d) C–D SRS images for representative
Gln-d5-labeled small (c, 6.7 μm2, green dot in a) and medium (d, 19.1 μm2, red dot in a) mHtt-97Q aggregates. Calculated mHtt-97Q concentrations
for the aggregates are indicated. Cell shapes and nuclei are outlined
by a white dotted line. Scale bar: 10 μm.
SRS quantification
for mHtt-97Q aggregates of different sizes.
(a) CH/CDs for Gln-d5-labeled aggregates
present a negative correlation on aggregation areas (Pearson’s
coefficient r = −0.56). (b) Minimum correlation
between CH/CDs for Leu-d10-labeled aggregates
and aggregation areas (Pearson’s coefficient r = −0.11). (c, d) C–D SRS images for representative
Gln-d5-labeled small (c, 6.7 μm2, green dot in a) and medium (d, 19.1 μm2, red dot in a) mHtt-97Q aggregates. Calculated mHtt-97Q concentrations
for the aggregates are indicated. Cell shapes and nuclei are outlined
by a white dotted line. Scale bar: 10 μm.In addition to calculating molar percentages from CH/CDs, we can
also compute absolute concentrations with aggregate intensities in
the C–D channel and our reference calibration curves (Figure d). Such quantification
is otherwise highly challenging for existing methods. We selected
three representative aggregates with different sizes for calculation
(Figure a, color-indicated,
details in the SI and results listed in Table S1). The mHtt protein concentration in
the small aggregate (Figure a, green dot) ranges from 1.2 to 2.1 mM (Figure c, 6.7 μm2). It increases to 4.3–5.1 mM (and Figure d, 19.1 μm2) for the medium
aggregate (Figure a, red dot). The concentration becomes 5.6–6.4 mM for the
large aggregate (36.5 μm2, Figure a, magenta dot). The upper and lower limits
shown are determined by the relative content of newly synthesized
and pre-existing non-mHtt proteins sequestered to the aggregates.
Surprisingly, we found that while mHtt concentrations increase with
aggregate sizes, the concentrations of non-mHtt proteins remain almost
the same for small (4.6 mM), medium (4.7 mM), and large (4.2 mM) aggregates
(Table S1). Our observations therefore
suggest that the formation of small aggregates preferentially sequesters
non-mHtt cytosolic proteins (to as high as 70%). These proteins are
likely functional chaperones, ribonucleoproteins, and structural proteins.[9−13] As the aggregates become larger, they then sequester more mHtt proteins.
This might indicate a cellular rescue mechanism during aggregate growth
by clearing toxic mHtt proteins.[4,7,8] Our data further demonstrate that the total protein concentrations
of these aggregates fall in the range 5–10 mM. To the best
of our knowledge, our study is the first to quantify the mHtt protein
concentrations and molar percentages for aggregates of different sizes
in live cells.
Interrogating Aggregate Structures and Aggregate–Environment
Interactions by Hyperspectral SRS (hSRS) Imaging
One key
advantage for in vitro spectroscopic studies over
live-cell fluorescence imaging is that they provide structural and
conformational information on the aggregates.[14−19] For instance, multiple reports suggested the presence of β-sheet-rich
structures in mHtt aggregates. However, there is still no consensus.[15,18] We therefore adopted hSRS to analyze mHtt-97Q aggregates in live
cells. We started with the amide I band since its Raman vibration
is well documented for probing protein secondary structures by vibrational
spectroscopy.[16] A recent report by label-free
hSRS imaging of amide I on amyloid plaques in brain tissues revealed
a clear 12 cm–1 blue shift (resolvable by our spectral
resolution of ∼12 cm–1), which corresponds
to cross-β sheet structures.[35] Nonetheless,
we observed no such difference comparing the amide I spectrum of mHtt
aggregates to that of the cellular background (Figure a, 1664 cm–1, blue vs red).
Similar to a recent study,[18] our data suggest
that β-sheet structures might not be enriched in these aggregates.
Note that we detected a spectral distortion upon chemical fixation
(Figure a, from 1600
to 1640 cm–1, green vs blue and magenta vs red),
highlighting the importance of live-sample analysis.[35,36] Similar to amide I, CH3 (2940 cm–1)
offers no discernible spectral information (Figure b), since the signals mainly come as sequestered
non-mHtt proteins. The aggregates’ spectra are almost identical
to those of nucleoli with abundant proteins and rRNA. The lower shoulder
at 2850 cm–1, attributed to CH2 vibrations,
implies reduced lipids in the aggregates.
Figure 5
Hyperspectral SRS analysis
on mHtt-97Q aggregates. (a) Average
amide I SRS spectra of live aggregates (Live agg, blue, n = 14), live cell-background (Live cell, red, n =
14), fixed aggregates (Fixed agg, green, n = 10),
and fixed cell-background (Fixed cell, magenta, n = 10). (b) Live-cell SRS CH3 spectra of aggregates (green, n = 14), cell background (blue, n = 16),
and nucleoli (orange, n = 16). (c) Live-cell SRS
C–D spectra of Gln-d5-labeled aggregates
(green, n = 20) and cell background (blue, n = 20). (d) Live-cell SRS C–D spectra on small mHtt
aggregates (green, n = 20), lipid droplets (red, n = 10), and nucleoli (blue, n = 12) with
distinct spectral features. Error bar: SD.
Hyperspectral SRS analysis
on mHtt-97Q aggregates. (a) Average
amide I SRS spectra of live aggregates (Live agg, blue, n = 14), live cell-background (Live cell, red, n =
14), fixed aggregates (Fixed agg, green, n = 10),
and fixed cell-background (Fixed cell, magenta, n = 10). (b) Live-cell SRS CH3 spectra of aggregates (green, n = 14), cell background (blue, n = 16),
and nucleoli (orange, n = 16). (c) Live-cell SRS
C–D spectra of Gln-d5-labeled aggregates
(green, n = 20) and cell background (blue, n = 20). (d) Live-cell SRS C–D spectra on small mHtt
aggregates (green, n = 20), lipid droplets (red, n = 10), and nucleoli (blue, n = 12) with
distinct spectral features. Error bar: SD.We next asked whether the C–D spectral region could offer
insightful structural information with specific aggregate labeling.
Interestingly, we observed a clear dip around 2146 cm–1 from aggregates compared to that from the cellular background (Figure c), suggesting a
structural or microenvironmental difference between aggregated and
cytosolic mHtt proteins. To understand such spectral changes, we fitted
the averaged spectra (Figure c) by three Lorentzian peaks (Figure S11a,b). Our results indicate that the observed 2146 cm–1 dip resulted from the narrowing and the slight red shift of the
shoulder peak at 2130 cm–1 (Figure S11c,d). The narrowing of the peak width is likely
due to the formation of a more ordered structure upon aggregation.[16] Our results establish that this shoulder peak
could serve as a sensitive indicator for the microenvironment of mHtt
aggregates. We note that the weak-intensity cellular background structures,
including nucleoli and lipid droplets shown in the C–D images,
might interfere with the specific analysis of small aggregates with
low signals. In this case, C–D spectra generated by hSRS on
aggregates, nucleoli, and lipid droplets could help unequivocally
differentiate these structures (Figure d).As we have proven our technique as an effective
method to analyze
the microenvironment of native aggregates, we sought to apply it to
understanding molecular interactions between polyQ aggregates and
heat shock proteins (HSPs), key chaperones for protein folding and
inhibiting protein aggregations.[37] This
may offer fundamental insight toward therapeutic development for HD.[6] We induced cellular heat shock responses by a
small-molecule drug, geldanamycin (GA), an inhibitor of HSP 90, which
has been shown to effectively induce the expression of HSP 40 and
70 for the clearance of polyQ aggregates.[37] We first validated the function of GA by confirming that the number
of large aggregates decreases with the treatment of increased GA concentrations[37] (Figure S12). We
next resorted to C–D hSRS on mHtt-97Q aggregates. Interestingly,
in GA-treated samples, we discovered a subset of aggregates with reduced
size and intensity that consistently present a varied spectral feature
with a lowered shoulder peak at 2132 cm–1 compared
to that of larger-size aggregates (Figure S13a,b). Inspired by this spectroscopic observation, we came back to mHtt-97Q-GFP
and adopted a correlative fluorescence and hSRS to understand this
phenomenon (Figure a). We found that such aggregates, when exhibiting the same SRS spectral
feature as found for the mHtt-97Q subset (Figure b and Figure S13c), always coexist with surrounding diffusive mHtt protein pools (Figure a, Fluorescence).
Recently, a liquid-to-solid phase transition is reported for the mHtt-97Q-GFP
proteins during aggregation formation.[38] We first speculated that our observed shoulder peak decrease is
caused by a reverse phase conversion from solid mHtt aggregates toward
the surrounding liquid pool by GA triggered upregulation of HSP 40/70.
However, the fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP) experiments
on the surrounding fluorescent pool did not reveal any fluorescence
exchange between the cytosolic and aggregated mHtt proteins (Figure S14), ruling out our phase-transition
hypothesis.
Figure 6
Hyperspectral SRS study of mHtt aggregations upon cellular heat
shock responses. (a) Fluorescence (green) and correlative SRS images
for mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregates (white arrowheaded) at 2167 cm–1 (C–D on-resonance), 2035 cm–1 (off-resonance),
and 2940 cm–1 (CH3) in live cells after
100 nM geldanamycin (GA) treatment for 20 h. Scale bar: 10 μm.
(b) SRS spectra of normal mHtt aggregates (green, n = 20) and a subset of GA-treated small aggregates (red, n = 7). (c) SRS spectra of mHtt aggregates in fixed cells
in DPBS buffer (green, n = 15), MeOH (yellow, n = 5), and DMSO (blue, n = 6). Error bar:
SD.
Hyperspectral SRS study of mHtt aggregations upon cellular heat
shock responses. (a) Fluorescence (green) and correlative SRS images
for mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregates (white arrowheaded) at 2167 cm–1 (C–D on-resonance), 2035 cm–1 (off-resonance),
and 2940 cm–1 (CH3) in live cells after
100 nM geldanamycin (GA) treatment for 20 h. Scale bar: 10 μm.
(b) SRS spectra of normal mHtt aggregates (green, n = 20) and a subset of GA-treated small aggregates (red, n = 7). (c) SRS spectra of mHtt aggregates in fixed cells
in DPBS buffer (green, n = 15), MeOH (yellow, n = 5), and DMSO (blue, n = 6). Error bar:
SD.Since C–D vibration is
sensitive to the microenvironment,
similar to that from CH,[39] we then asked
whether such a decrease at the 2132 cm–1 shoulder
peak corresponds to a change of secondary structures when interacting
with HSP 40/70 proteins, as suggested by previous in vitro EM experiments.[40] To test the hypothesis,
we emerged fixed non-GA-treated cells containing mHtt-97Q-GFP aggregates
in solvents with descending hydrogen-bonding capacity (Figure c, from DPBS buffer (green),
to MeOH (yellow) and DMSO (blue)). Interestingly, the 2132 cm–1 shoulder increases accordingly (Figure c, vertical line). Quantitative
fittings for the averaged spectra with three Lorentzian peaks (Figure S15a–c) further confirmed an increase
of ratios between the shoulder (2130 cm–1, peak1)
and the major (2169 cm–1, peak2) peaks (Figure S15e,f) from DPBS-treated aggregates (Figure S15a) to DMSO-treated aggregates (Figure S15c). This indicates that the peak1/peak2
ratios may report the local solvation states (e.g., hydrogen bonding)
of aggregates. Similar fitting for the averaged spectrum from GA-treated
aggregates (Figure S15d) showed that it
poses the lowest peak1/peak2 ratio (Figure S15e,f), suggesting that the local solvation environment for our captured
GA-treated aggregates may be more hydrogen-bonded compared to that
for regular cellular proteomes (Figure S15d). Such likely hyperhydration status might be caused by a partially
folded state, a folding intermediate, for aggregates upon interacting
with HSP 40/70 in live cells.[41] We further
analyzed the CH/CD ratios on these small aggregates in cells with
and without induced heat-shock responses. We postulated that if the
heat-shock responses recruit extra HSPs to the aggregates, as our
hSRS data suggested above, we might detect an increase in CH/CD ratios
since the percentage of the non-mHtt proteins is higher in these aggregates.
We indeed found that the CH/CD ratios became slightly higher in small
aggregates from cells under induced heat-shock responses compared
to those in similarly sized aggregates from noninduced cells (Figure S16).
Conclusions
In
summary, we demonstrated the combination of SRS microscopy with
Gln-d5 labeling to be a general platform
for sensitive and specific imaging, ratiometric quantification, and
hyperspectral analysis of native polyQ aggregates in HD. Our technique
provides new and complementary structural and compositional information
to our current knowledge of polyQ aggregates. As shown above, our
detection sensitivity and specificity are ensured from three aspects.
First, the expanded polyQ sequences yield a Gln-d5 labeling enrichment in disease proteins over the normal
proteins with only low Q abundance. Second, the formation of the aggregates
is specifically induced by these disease-form polyQ proteins. Together,
these ensure a much higher signal from polyQ aggregates compared to
that from the cellular background. Third, in the case the aggregates
are small with low signals, hSRS on aggregates adds an additional
layer of spectral specificity, differentiating the aggregates from
other puncta-like structures, including nucleoli and lipid droplets.Our method is also applicable to polyQ expansions of various lengths.
In particular, with linear concentration dependence, it is suited
for investigating aggregates of extended polyQ construct (e.g., >200Q),
which may form rather dense structures and pose challenges to study
by other strategies. Our method is also applicable to other polyQ
diseases, including spinocerebellar ataxia and spinobulbar muscular
atrophy.[42] Other poly aa diseases[43,44] with poly-glycine-alanine (poly-GA), poly-proline-arginine (poly-PR),
and poly-proline-alanine (poly-PA) aggregates, recently reported in
the ALS/FTDpatient brain, could also be investigated by selective
deuteration of corresponding aa. To better guide future SRS work on
these aggregates, we further calculated the corresponding SRS detection
limits for representative, varying lengths of polyQ and poly aa sequences
(Table S2). In addition, since Gln can
transport across the blood–brain barrier,[45] and deuterium labeling is minimally invasive, applications
to animal models or even to humans may be possible. Moreover, correlative
live-cell SRS imaging with Gln-d5 labeling
with recently demonstrated Cryo-ET[11] or
quantitative proteomics[12] may offer a comprehensive
structure–function relationship for native mHtt-97Q aggregates.
Authors: Atsushi Iwata; John C Christianson; Mirella Bucci; Lisa M Ellerby; Nobuyuki Nukina; Lysia S Forno; Ron R Kopito Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: L Mangiarini; K Sathasivam; M Seller; B Cozens; A Harper; C Hetherington; M Lawton; Y Trottier; H Lehrach; S W Davies; G P Bates Journal: Cell Date: 1996-11-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Yvonne S Eisele; Cecilia Monteiro; Colleen Fearns; Sandra E Encalada; R Luke Wiseman; Evan T Powers; Jeffery W Kelly Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: John B Warner; Kiersten M Ruff; Piau Siong Tan; Edward A Lemke; Rohit V Pappu; Hilal A Lashuel Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Minbiao Ji; Michal Arbel; Lili Zhang; Christian W Freudiger; Steven S Hou; Dongdong Lin; Xinju Yang; Brian J Bacskai; X Sunney Xie Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Charles H Wolstenholme; Hang Hu; Songtao Ye; Brian E Funk; Divya Jain; Chia-Heng Hsiung; Gang Ning; Yu Liu; Xiaosong Li; Xin Zhang Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Diana M Mitrea; Matthäus Mittasch; Beatriz Ferreira Gomes; Isaac A Klein; Mark A Murcko Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 112.288