Literature DB >> 32341939

Verification of the accuracy of a hybrid breast imaging simulation framework for virtual clinical trial applications.

Liesbeth Vancoillie1, Nicholas Marshall1,2, Lesley Cockmartin2, Janne Vignero2, Guozhi Zhang2, Hilde Bosmans1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of system parameters on signal detectability can be studied with simulation platforms. We describe the steps taken to verify and confirm the accuracy of a local platform developed for the use in virtual clinical trials. Approach: The platform simulates specific targets into existing two-dimensional full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis images acquired on a Siemens Inspiration system. There are three steps: (1) creation of voxel models or analytical objects; (2) generation of a realistic object template with accurate resolution, scatter, and noise properties; and (3) insertion and reconstruction. Four objects were simulated: a 0.5-mm aluminium (Al) sphere and a 0.2-mm-thick Al sheet in a PMMA stack, a 0.8-mm steel edge and a three-dimensional mass model in a structured background phantom. Simulated results were compared to acquired data.
Results: Peak contrast and signal difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) were in close agreement ( < 5 % error) for both sphere and sheet. The similarity of pixel value profiles for sphere and sheet in the x y direction and the artifact spread function for real and simulated spheres confirmed accurate geometric modeling. Absolute and relative average deviation between modulation transfer function measured from a real and simulated edges showed accurate sharpness modelling for spatial frequencies up to the Nyquist frequency. Real and simulated objects could not be differentiated visually. Conclusions: The results indicate that this simulation framework is a strong candidate for use in virtual clinical studies.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast imaging; digital breast tomosynthesis; digital mammography; simulation framework; virtual clinical trial

Year:  2020        PMID: 32341939      PMCID: PMC7175415          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.042804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  23 in total

1.  The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Eman Shaheen; Chantal Van Ongeval; Federica Zanca; Lesley Cockmartin; Nicholas Marshall; Jurgen Jacobs; Kenneth C Young; David R Dance; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Simulation of 3D objects into breast tomosynthesis images.

Authors:  E Shaheen; F Zanca; F Sisini; G Zhang; J Jacobs; H Bosmans
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Characterisation of noise and sharpness of images from four digital breast tomosynthesis systems for simulation of images for virtual clinical trials.

Authors:  Alistair Mackenzie; Nicholas W Marshall; Andria Hadjipanteli; David R Dance; Hilde Bosmans; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.

Authors:  L Cockmartin; N W Marshall; G Zhang; K Lemmens; E Shaheen; C Van Ongeval; E Fredenberg; D R Dance; E Salvagnini; K Michielsen; H Bosmans
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Verification of the accuracy of a hybrid breast imaging simulation framework for virtual clinical trial applications.

Authors:  Liesbeth Vancoillie; Nicholas Marshall; Lesley Cockmartin; Janne Vignero; Guozhi Zhang; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-22

7.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution.

Authors:  W Que; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Andriy I Bandos; Randi Gullien; Ellen B Eben; Ulrika Ekseth; Unni Haakenaasen; Mina Izadi; Ingvild N Jebsen; Gunnar Jahr; Mona Krager; Loren T Niklason; Solveig Hofvind; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Lorraine Tucker; Maureen Gc Gillan; Paula Willsher; Julie Cooke; Karen A Duncan; Michael J Michell; Hilary M Dobson; Yit Yoong Lim; Hema Purushothaman; Celia Strudley; Susan M Astley; Oliver Morrish; Kenneth C Young; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  Verification of the accuracy of a hybrid breast imaging simulation framework for virtual clinical trial applications.

Authors:  Liesbeth Vancoillie; Nicholas Marshall; Lesley Cockmartin; Janne Vignero; Guozhi Zhang; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-22

2.  VIRTUAL CLINICAL TRIALS IN MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEM EVALUATION AND OPTIMISATION.

Authors:  Bruno Barufaldi; Andrew D A Maidment; Magnus Dustler; Rebecca Axelsson; Hanna Tomic; Sophia Zackrisson; Anders Tingberg; Predrag R Bakic
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 0.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.