Daptomycin is known as an effective antibiotic lipopeptide which shows activity against the number of Gram-positive pathogens. Its primary target is the bacterial cell membrane. However, the detailed mechanism of daptomycin action is still subject to debate. In this paper, we have investigated the interactions between lipopeptide and model lipid films composed of negatively charged phosphatidylglycerols and cardiolipin. In order to evaluate the effect of daptomycin on the molecular organization and the properties of lipid assemblies, we have used surface pressure measurements and electrochemical methods combined with atomic force microscopy, quartz crystal microbalance, and surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. Our results indicate that daptomycin interaction with the lipid membrane is complex. It involves daptomycin aggregation and partial insertion, which in turn affect the charge distribution on both sides of the membrane and may result in a gradient of water chemical potential. The latter can drive the flux of water across the membrane.
Daptomycin is known as an effective antibiotic lipopeptide which shows activity against the number of Gram-positive pathogens. Its primary target is the bacterial cell membrane. However, the detailed mechanism of daptomycin action is still subject to debate. In this paper, we have investigated the interactions between lipopeptide and model lipid films composed of negatively charged phosphatidylglycerols and cardiolipin. In order to evaluate the effect of daptomycin on the molecular organization and the properties of lipid assemblies, we have used surface pressure measurements and electrochemical methods combined with atomic force microscopy, quartz crystal microbalance, and surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. Our results indicate that daptomycin interaction with the lipid membrane is complex. It involves daptomycin aggregation and partial insertion, which in turn affect the charge distribution on both sides of the membrane and may result in a gradient of water chemical potential. The latter can drive the flux of water across the membrane.
Amphiphilic peptides
represent a broad class of compounds composed
of hydrophobic and hydrophilic amino acid sequences or hydrophilic
peptide moieties covalently linked to the lipophilic chains. Because
of their amphipathic surfactant-like character, these compounds can
organize in numerous supramolecular nanostructures like micelles,
fibrils, nanotubes, or nanobelts.[1,2] They also show
high affinity to lipid bilayers which makes them potentially useful
for biomedical applications. Numerous amphiphilic peptides or lipopeptides
were demonstrated to affect the permeability of lipid membranes as
a result of pore formation or local solubilization of the membrane.[3−6] For this reason, these compounds are often considered as candidates
for new antibiotics, which act on bacterial cell membranes.Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide produced by the soil bacterium Streptomyces roseosporus. It consists of a cyclic portion
composed of 10 amino acid residues and the linear portion including
3 amino acid residues connected to decanoyl fatty acid chain. The
characteristic feature of this compound is the presence of nonproteinogenic
amino acids: l-kynurenine (Kyn) and l-3-methylglutamic
acid (mGlu). It was demonstrated in numerous papers that daptomycin
displays a strong antimicrobial activity against the series of Gram-positive
pathogens within nanomolar and micromolar range.[7−9] Although the
clinical efficacy of daptomycin is quite well established, the molecular
mechanism of its action remains unclear. So far it was recognized
that daptomycin shows increased affinity to negatively charged membranes
containing phosphatidylglycerols, which constitute an important lipid
component of the bacterial cell membranes.[10] Moreover, its activity strictly depends on the presence of calcium
ions, which can facilitate lipopeptide binding and oligomerization
by neutralizing negative charges of peptide moieties and lipid polar
heads.[11−13] As a result, daptomycin interacts with the bacterial
cell membranes and causes their depolarization.[14−16] The studies
on model bilayers revealed increased transmembrane flux of small cations
in the presence of daptomycin, which is often interpreted as indicative
of pore formation.[17] Nevertheless, some
papers have shown results inconsistent with such a scenario. For example,
significant perturbation of lipid membrane in giant unilamellar vesicles
composed of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleylphosphatidylcholine (POPC) and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleylphosphatidylglycerol
(POPG) was observed by Kreutzberger and co-workers.[18] These authors have concluded that daptomycin does not translocate
across the lipid bilayer. Instead, it tends to form clusters with
negatively charged lipids. An interesting effect of daptomycin on
PG-containing bilayers was demonstrated by Chen and co-workers, who
observed a lipid-extracting phenomenon, which as the authors claim
can be correlated to the antibacterial activity of daptomycin.[19]To explore the nature of daptomycin action,
we have designed model
lipid films composed of negatively charged phosphatidylglycerols and
cardiolipin, which are known to be the predominant lipid species occurring
in cell membranes of Gram-positive bacteria. By using surface pressure
measurements and electrochemical methods combined with atomic force
microscopy (AFM), quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), and surface-enhanced
infrared absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS), we have examined how the
presence of daptomycin affects the electrical and mechanical properties
of lipid assemblies. These techniques proved to be useful in molecular-scale
characterization of interactions of biologically active compounds
with model membranes.[20−23]
Experimental Section
Chemicals
1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol
(POPG), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol
(DPPG), and 1′,3′-bis[1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho]-glycerol (CL) were purchased from Avanti Polar
Lipids Inc. These particular lipids were chosen as components of lipid
films to attain sufficient stability of the monolayers and bilayers.
Daptomycin, HEPES, calcium dichloride, and ultrapure methanol were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, while potassium chloride and chloroform
were purchased from POCh Gliwice. Analytical grade sodium hydroxide
was purchased from Chempur. All reagents were used as received. The
water was purified through Milli-Q system (resistivity 18.2 MΩ
× cm). In all experiments, we have used an aqueous buffer solution
of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4 unless otherwise stated.
Surface Pressure
Measurements
The monolayers at the
air–buffer interface were formed using a KSV NIMA L &LB
trough (Biolin Scientific, Sweden) equipped with two movable hydrophilic
barriers. HEPES buffer (0.01 M) with 2 mM calcium ions was used as
a subphase. Surface pressure was measured using a Wilhelmy plate made
of paper. The barriers and the trough were cleaned before each experiment
using a chloroform/methanol mixture and then water. Spreading solutions
were prepared by dissolving DPPG/POPG/CL (1:1:2 mol/mol/mol) lipids
in chloroform/methanol mixture (4:1, v/v) to a final concentration
of 1 mg/mL. After spreading, the films at the air–buffer interface
were left for 15 min to complete solvent evaporation. Surface pressure
versus area per molecule isotherms were recorded at the barriers speed
of 10 mm/min and at a constant temperature of subphase (22 ±
1 °C) measured after each experiment. Stock solution of daptomycin
was obtained by dissolving lipopeptide in ultrapure water. All experiments
at the air–water interface were repeated at least three times
to ensure the reproducibility of the results. Calculated errors correspond
to the standard deviation.
Liposomes Preparation
Small unilamellar
vesicles (SUVs)
were prepared according to the procedure described by Barenholtz and
co-workers.[24] Stock solutions containing
∼5.0 mg/mL of POPG, ∼5.0 mg/mL of DPPG, and ∼5.0
mg/mL of CL in chloroform/methanol (4:1, v/v) were mixed in a test
tube at the desired molar ratio of 1:1:2. The solvent was evaporated
by vortexing the solution under the stream of argon, and then the
test tube with dry lipid cake was placed in a vacuum desiccator for
1 h. After removal of solvent residues, 1.0 mL of an aqueous buffer
solution was added to the lipid cake and the mixture was sonicated
at ∼37 °C for 1 h. The resulting suspension of SUVs was
transparent.
Electrochemistry
In all electrochemical
experiments,
we used CHI 750B potentiostat (CH Instruments, Inc., Austin, TX) with
a three-electrode cell comprising Ag/AgCl/sat. KCl reference electrode,
Pt foil as a counter electrode, and Au(111) as a working electrode.
The Au(111) working electrode was cleaned before experiments in piranha
solution (H2SO4/H2O2,
3:1 v/v. CAUTION: piranha reacts violently with organic compounds.),
rinsed with ultrapure water, and flame-annealed. Self-assembled monolayers
of 1-thio-β-d-glucose (further referenced as thioglucose)
were prepared by immersing the gold electrode in an aqueous solution
containing 0.1 mg/mL of the active compound for ∼2 h, and then
the electrodes were thoroughly rinsed with ultrapure water. The electrochemical
measurements were carried out in the hanging meniscus configuration.
Alternating current (AC) voltammetry measurements were performed with
a scan rate of 5 mV/s, AC perturbation with an root-mean-square amplitude
of 10 mV, and a frequency of 20 Hz. The differential capacitance curves
were derived from the in-phase and out-of-phase components of the
AC signal under the assumption that the electrode–electrolyte
interface can be considered as a simple RC circuit. In order to determine
potential of zero free charge, the immersion method was used.[25] Briefly, the working electrode was placed above
the electrolyte and polarized to the desired potential (the applied
potentials were in the range of +0.30 to −0.40 V with 0.05
V interval). Then the electrode was slowly lowered toward the electrolyte
and the current flow was measured upon contact. The same method was
utilized in chronocoulometry measurements. Electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy experiments were performed within the frequency range
of 10–1 to 104 Hz at the potential of
+0.1 V and the amplitude of 0.01 V. All of the measurements were performed
at 22 ± 1 °C. All potentials reported in this work are referenced
to Ag/AgCl/sat. KCl electrode. The supporting electrolyte used in
all electrochemical experiments was an aqueous buffer solution of
HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation
Monitoring
Q-Sense E1 instrument (Q-Sense AB, Sweden) was
used for real-time
monitoring of mass and viscoelasticity changes of the lipid membranes
immobilized on solid support upon the addition of daptomycin. The
sensor crystals were 5 MHz, AT-cut quartz electrodes with 100 nm evaporated
gold and titanium adhesion layer (QSX 338). Before the experiments,
the crystals were cleaned with piranha solution (concentrated H2SO4/H2O2) (3:1 v/v) for approximately
5 min, rinsed thoroughly with Milli-Q water, then sonicated in 2%
Hellmanex solution for 30 min in 35 °C and rinsed with Milli-Q
water. After drying under Ar stream, the crystals were immersed in
0.1 mM thioglucose solution in methanol for 12 h. After that, the
substrates were rinsed with methanol and water and mounted in an electrochemical
three-electrode QCM-D cell with miniaturized Ag/AgCl/sat. KCl as a
reference electrode and platinum wire as a counter electrode. Potential
was controlled with CHI 750B potentiostat (CH Instruments, Inc., Austin,
TX). HEPES buffer with 2 mM calcium ions was passed through the chamber
using a peristaltic pump at the flow rate of 0.15 mL/min for about
15 min to obtain the stable baseline of frequency and dissipation.
Solid-supported lipid bilayers were prepared by a liposome spreading
method. The stock solution of DPPG/POPG/CL liposomes was injected
into the QCM-D chamber at a flow rate of 0.15 mL/min. Following the
formation of a stable lipid bilayer, crystals were rinsed with buffer
solution to remove any nonruptured vesicles. After approximately 20
min, the 3 μM solution of daptomycin was added at the flow rate
of 0.15 mL/min. Afterward, the pump was stopped. QCM-D crystals covered
with lipid bilayer were subjected to a stagnant daptomycin solution
up to 3 h. The values of frequency and dissipation were measured at
four overtones (third, fifth, seventh, and ninth).
Topography
Imaging
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments
were performed with Dimension Icon (Bruker) in PeakForce Tapping Mode
with ScanAsyst Fluid probes (Bruker, nominal spring constant 0.7 N/m).
The samples were imaged under in situ conditions
in an aqueous buffer solution at the temperature of 22 ± 1 °C.
Potential was controlled with CHI 750B potentiostat (CH Instruments,
Inc., Austin, TX), platinum wire served as a counter electrode and
miniaturized Ag|AgCl|sat.KCl as a reference electrode The bilayers
were deposited on thioglucose-modified Au(111) substrates by spreading
small unilamellar vesicles and the bilayer formation was completed
within approximately 2 h. The thickness of lipid bilayers was determined
based on a cross-sectional analysis of defects as an average height
difference between the bare substrate and the region covered by lipid
film.
Surface-Enhanced Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy
The
spectra were recorded using Nicolet iS50 infrared spectrometer (Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc.) equipped with liquid nitrogen cooled MCT-A
detector and custom-made single-reflection accessory. The incident
angle was set at 60°, and the spectral resolution was 4 cm–1. The spectra are displayed in absorbance units defined
as A = log(I0/I), where I0 and I correspond to the intensities of IR radiation observed for the reference
and the sample, respectively. In all experiments, we have used all-glass
spectroelectrochemical cell with platinum foil as a counter electrode
and Ag/AgCl/sat. KCl as a reference electrode. The working electrode
was a thin gold film deposited on a reflectance plane of a silicon
hemispherical prism accordingly to the procedure described in the
literature.[26] PGSTAT101 potentiostat (Metrohm
Autolab) was utilized to control electrode potential. Omnic 9 software
(Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used for data processing.
Results
and Discussion
Surface Pressure Measurements
To
assess the aggregation
behavior of daptomycin under the experimental conditions used in this
work, we have determined its critical micelle concentration (CMC). Figure presents the dependence
of the surface pressure as a function of the natural logarithm of
daptomycin concentration in an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10
mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted
to pH = 7.4. At low concentrations, the surface pressure changes sharply
with increasing concentration of lipopeptide. This is related to increasing
number of surfactant molecules at the interface. However, above a
certain concentration the dependence becomes weak since daptomycin
interfacial concentration does not change significantly. Consequently,
we can observe two linear regimes on the plot and the inflection point
indicates CMC, which was found to be 91 μM. For comparison,
the value of 0.12 mM was determined from fluorescence measurements
in 0.1 M KCl by Kirkham and co-workers.[27] The small difference may result from the different composition of
the solution as well as the method used for CMC determination since
surface tension measurements often exhibit lower sensitivity compared
with fluorescence-based assays. To ensure complete dispersion of molecules
in solution, the concentration of daptomycin in subsequent experiments
was kept at the level of well below CMC that is within the range of
0.5–3 μM.
Figure 1
Dependence of the surface pressure as a function of the
natural
logarithm of the bulk concentration of daptomycin. Surface pressure
measurements were performed on an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES
(10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM)
adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Dependence of the surface pressure as a function of the
natural
logarithm of the bulk concentration of daptomycin. Surface pressure
measurements were performed on an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES
(10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM)
adjusted to pH = 7.4.According to numerous
reports, bacterial cell membrane is considered
as a primary target for daptomycin, which is assumed to incorporate
into the lipid assembly and affect the overall permeability of the
bilayer.[28] In order to evaluate daptomycin
interactions with lipids, we have performed surface pressure measurements
utilizing POPG/DPPG/CL monolayer spread at the air–buffer interface.
The ability of daptomycin to incorporate into the lipid film was examined
by following the surface pressure changes of the monolayer during
its lateral compression on an aqueous HEPES buffer containing calcium
ions and dissolved lipopeptide (see Figure ). The lift-off of the isotherm recorded
for POPG/DPPG/CL monolayer in the absence of daptomycin starts at
area per molecule equals approximately 150 Å2. Then
the phase transition occurs that is attributed to the transition from
a liquid-expanded (LE) to a liquid condensed phase (LC). After the
phase transition, the isotherm rises rapidly while reducing the area
per molecule and collapses at approximately 62 mN/m. This confirms
the formation of a stable and well-ordered monolayer at the air–buffer
interface. Next, the POPG/DPPG/CL isotherms were recorded on the buffered
subphase containing three different concentrations of daptomycin:
5 × 10–7 M, 10–6 M, and 3
× 10–6 M. The analysis of isotherms allows
one to determine characteristic parameters of the monolayers, that
is, limiting and minimum molecular area as well as collapse surface
pressure. The limiting molecular area was determined by extrapolating
the slope of the isotherm to zero surface pressure, and it is interpreted
as the hypothetical area occupied by one molecule in either solid
or liquid-condensed phase. The minimum molecular area refers to the
area at which collapse pressure occurs, that is, the smallest area
occupied by a molecule in the monolayer.
Figure 2
Surface pressure versus
area per molecule isotherms (A) and the
changes in compression modulus as a function of the surface pressure
(B) obtained for POPG/DPPG/CL monolayers compressed on pure buffer
subphase (black curve) and buffer subphase containing different concentration
of daptomycin (colored curves). The aqueous buffer solution contained
HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) and it was adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Surface pressure versus
area per molecule isotherms (A) and the
changes in compression modulus as a function of the surface pressure
(B) obtained for POPG/DPPG/CL monolayers compressed on pure buffer
subphase (black curve) and buffer subphase containing different concentration
of daptomycin (colored curves). The aqueous buffer solution contained
HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) and it was adjusted to pH = 7.4.The obtained isotherms depicted in Figure demonstrate that the presence of daptomycin
in the subphase induces changes in the surface properties of POPG/DPPG/CL
membrane. The lift-off point of the isotherms shifts toward higher
values of area per molecules with increasing daptomycin concentration.
Similar changes are observed for limiting area per molecule and minimal
area per molecule (Table ). This suggests that daptomycin incorporates into POPG/DPPG/CL
membrane during its formation and it is not squeezed out from the
monolayer even at high surface pressure values. However, the increasing
amount of daptomycin within the POPG/DPPG/CL membrane decreases the
stability of the monolayer which is manifested by the decreasing value
of the surface pressure at which the collapse of the monolayer occurs.
Moreover, for the lowest concentration of daptomycin in the subphase
the phase transition shifts toward a slightly higher value of surface
pressure and it becomes less developed, while it completely disappears
for higher daptomycin concentration. Such behavior together with increasing
limiting area per molecule is commonly attributed to the increasing
fluidity of the model lipid membrane.[29] These changes on isotherms are also manifested in a variation of
the values of compression modulus, which is defined aswhere π is the surface pressure and A is the
area per molecule. This parameter provides information
on the state in which the monolayer exists at a given surface pressure.
It is assumed that compression modulus below 12.5 mN/m corresponds
to a gaseous phase, between 12.5 and 100 mN/m, the monolayer is in
a liquid expanded state, the range of 100–250 mN/m is characteristic
for a liquid condensed state, and the values above 250 mN/m are indicative
of a solid state. The maximum value of compression modulus for the
monolayer registered on pure buffer subphase is equal to 163 mN/m,
which indicates that the monolayer is in a liquid-condensed state.
The addition of daptomycin to the subphase leads to a slight decrease
in the maximum of compression modulus indicating some disordering
effect on lipid film. This effect becomes more pronounced with the
increasing concentration of lipopeptide. The maximum value of compression
modulus, although decreased, remains in the range corresponding to
the liquid-condensed phase. Hence, the daptomycin substantially decreases
molecular packing density within the film but with moderate fluidizing
effect. This may be indicative of relatively strong lipid–lipopeptide
interactions, which hinder to some extent motional freedom of the
molecules within the assembly. On the other hand, substantially increased
molecular area might be a relevant factor contributing to the increased
permeability of the film.
Table 1
Properties of Monolayers
at the Air–Buffer
Interface
monolayer
limiting
area per molecule [Å2]
collapse
pressure [mN/m]
minimum area
per molecule [Å2]
maximum Cs–1 [mN/m]
POPG/DPPG/CL (1:1:2)
72.0 ± 0.1
62.8 ± 0.8
32.4 ± 0.9
163 ± 9
+ 5 × 10–7 M daptomycin
116.5 ± 0.4
56.8 ± 0.9
78.9 ± 0.8
165 ± 12
+ 10–6 M daptomycin
169.4 ± 1.2
49.2 ± 0.9
124.5 ± 0.7
151 ± 10
+ 3 × 10–6 M daptomycin
277.4 ± 0.9
39.7 ± 0.9
215.6 ± 1.1
140 ± 7
The above-presented results concern the action of daptomycin during
the formation of a model lipid membrane. However, in physiological
conditions the antibiotic interacts with already existing cell membranes.
Therefore, we have examined the effect of daptomycin on the already
precompressed lipid layer (Figure ). The POPG/DPPG/CL monolayer was first compressed
to the surface pressure of 35 mN/m, since at this value the molecular
packing within the monolayer roughly corresponds to the packing of
the molecules in natural cell membranes.[29] The surface pressure of a pure POPG/DPPG/CL monolayer measured at
a constant area decreases slightly over time. This decrease may result
from the partial solubility of the lipids in the subphase or from
the oxidation of the double bond present in POPG molecule.[30] Moreover, since all three components of the
monolayer are negatively charged and the monolayer at 35 mN/m exists
in a highly ordered state, the repulsive forces between molecules
may induce the expulsion of some molecules into the subphase. After
compression of POPG/DPPG/CL monolayer to 35 mN/m, daptomycin was injected into the subphase
to give the desired final concentration and the changes in surface
pressure were recorded in time until equilibrium pressure was reached.
The injection of daptomycin results in a substantial rapid increase
in surface pressure, which is mainly driven by interactions between
daptomycin–Ca2+ complex and negatively charged lipid
polar headgoups and the incorporation of the drug into the lipid monolayer
due to the hydrophobic interactions. However, after reaching the maximum
a slight decrease in surface pressure was observed, which may result
from a slow reorganization of lipid chains upon interactions with
drug molecules.[31] The quasi-plateau indicating
that the monolayer approaches the steady-state was reached after approximately
45–60 min. The surface pressure increases steadily with the
increasing daptomycin concentration in the subphase. The analysis
performed 3 h after the addition of daptomycin revealed the increase
in surface pressure values by 10.6, 14.0, and 19.8 mN/m for daptomycin
concentration equals 5 × 10–7, 10–6, and 3 × 10–6 M, respectively. Such a significant
and stable increase in surface pressure indicates that daptomycin
interacts with lipid polar headgroups and inserts into the hydrophobic
region of the lipid layer. These results clearly indicate that daptomycin
can spontaneously insert into negatively charged POPG/DPPG/CL membrane.
Figure 3
Changes
in a surface pressure as a function of time recorded for
POPG/DPPG/CL monolayer compressed to initial surface pressure of 35
mN/m on an aqueous buffer after injection of daptomycin into the subphase.
An aqueous buffer solution contained HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM) and calcium dichloride (2 mM) and it was adjusted to pH =
7.4.
Changes
in a surface pressure as a function of time recorded for
POPG/DPPG/CL monolayer compressed to initial surface pressure of 35
mN/m on an aqueous buffer after injection of daptomycin into the subphase.
An aqueous buffer solution contained HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM) and calcium dichloride (2 mM) and it was adjusted to pH =
7.4.
Electrochemical Characterization
Although the monolayers
at air–water interface are often used as a model assembly to
evaluate the interactions between lipids and biologically relevant
molecules, they do not fully reflect supramolecular organization of
lipids within biological membranes. Therefore, we have evaluated the
daptomycin behavior in the presence of model lipid bilayer supported
on solid surface. For that purpose, POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer was deposited
on gold electrode premodified with thioglucose forming a floating
bilayer lipid membrane (fBLM).[32,33] Such approach offers
several advantages. First of all, it enables electrochemical control
of the transmembrane potential by applying external electric field
of comparable magnitude as in biological membranes. Another advantage
of fBLM is that thioglucose interlayer can act as hydrophilic cushion
which assures better hydration of lipid polar heads located in the
inner leaflet of the membrane in the vicinity of electrode surface.
Recently, the presence of water layer between POPG/DPPG/CL membrane
and thioglucose-modified gold electrode was proved experimentally
using surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy.[34]To evaluate how the stability of the lipid
membrane is affected by the electric field, we have performed differential
capacitance measurements. As can be concluded from Figure , the variation of the differential
capacitance for intact fBLM is minor between +0.4 and −0.3
V with a shallow minimum at ∼4.7 μF/cm2, indicating
that the membrane is stable within this potential range. The capacitance
is growing at more negative potentials, which reflect the increasing
amount of water accumulating at the interface between the bilayer
and the thioglucose. The latter is related to electroporation of the
film and the onset of electrodewetting.[35] Finally, the pseudocapacitive peak at −0.73 V appears, which
is indicative of the desorption of the membrane.
Figure 4
Potential-dependent changes
in a differential capacitance of thioglucose-modified
gold electrodes with POPG/DPPG/CL membrane. The supporting electrolyte
was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4. Inset
shows schematic view of the fBLM architecture.
Potential-dependent changes
in a differential capacitance of thioglucose-modified
gold electrodes with POPG/DPPG/CL membrane. The supporting electrolyte
was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4. Inset
shows schematic view of the fBLM architecture.Further, we have used the immersion method to determine the potential
of zero free charge (Epzfc) for thioglucose-modified
gold electrodes with POPG/DPPG/CL membrane in the absence and in the
presence of daptomycin. Figure illustrates the resulting plots of the charge density as
a function of the potential applied to the electrode. It can be seen
that the value of Epzfc for intact POPG/DPPG/CL
membrane is about +0.18 V, while in the presence of daptomycin it
is shifted down to −0.20 V.
Figure 5
Free charge plotted as a function of the
immersion potential for
thioglucose-modified gold (111) electrode with the POPG/DPPG/CL floating
bilayer in the absence (black) and presence (red) of daptomycin (3
μM). Each point represents an average from three independent
measurements and error bars correspond to the standard deviation.
The supporting electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES
(10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM)
adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Free charge plotted as a function of the
immersion potential for
thioglucose-modified gold (111) electrode with the POPG/DPPG/CL floating
bilayer in the absence (black) and presence (red) of daptomycin (3
μM). Each point represents an average from three independent
measurements and error bars correspond to the standard deviation.
The supporting electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES
(10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM)
adjusted to pH = 7.4.Daptomycin is known to
bind with calcium ions with 1:1 stoichiometry.[13] It means that the resulting complex is still
monoanion, which after binding to the membrane can alter the charge
distribution across the membrane and contributes to the negative shift
in Epzfc. It is supported by the results
of chronocoulometry experiment shown in Figure performed within similar time-scale as liposome
leakage experiments reported in the literature. In this case, the
potential of +0.10 V was applied to the electrode modified with intact
fBLM and then the electrode was brought into the contact with supporting
electrolyte. Since Epzfc for this system
was determined to be +0.18 V, the potential of +0.10 V is negative
with respect to Epzfc. Therefore, the
electrode surface becomes negatively charged under these conditions
as can also be deduced from negative charge flow. Using the value
of Epzfc, one can roughly estimate the
transmembrane potential as a difference between potential applied
to the electrode and the potential of zero free charge (ϕtrans = Eapp – Epzfc).[35] The resulting value
of ϕtrans is −0.08 V, which is close to the
transmembrane potentials observed in biological membranes. Further,
the daptomycin was injected into the electrochemical cell and approximately
after 5 min of exposure, the Q versus t curve displayed well-pronounced inflection and the charge started
to change toward the zero value. The latter is reached after approximately
20 min upon injection of lipopeptide. Such behavior may be considered
as indicative of the slow dissipation of transmembrane potential resulting
from the redistribution of ions on both sides of the membrane. This
seems to be in line with earlier reported observations that daptomycin
causes incomplete or at least slow depolarization of the membrane.[36] After prolonged exposure to daptomycin, the
charge was still rising and finally reached positive values. It means
that the electrode surface became positively charged. This is fully
in line with the results shown in Figure , since in the presence of the daptomycin
the charge density at the metal surface is positive at the potential
of +0.1 V. These results demonstrate that indeed daptomycin has a
strong effect on the distribution of ions on both sides of the lipid
membrane, which in turn affects the charge of the electrode surface.
Figure 6
Charge
versus time curves recorded after immersion of the thioglucose-modified
Au(111) electrode with POPG/DPPG/CL floating bilayer in a buffer solution
while holding constant potential of +0.1 V. Black curve was recorded
in the absence of daptomycin, while red curve was recorded under the
same conditions with the exception that daptomycin was added to the
electrochemical cell ∼12 min after immersion of the electrode.
The concentration of lipopeptide was 3 μM. The supporting electrolyte
was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Charge
versus time curves recorded after immersion of the thioglucose-modified
Au(111) electrode with POPG/DPPG/CL floating bilayer in a buffer solution
while holding constant potential of +0.1 V. Black curve was recorded
in the absence of daptomycin, while red curve was recorded under the
same conditions with the exception that daptomycin was added to the
electrochemical cell ∼12 min after immersion of the electrode.
The concentration of lipopeptide was 3 μM. The supporting electrolyte
was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4.In order to evaluate whether the effect of membrane
depolarization
is related to pore-forming activity of daptomycin, we have performed
electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) experiments. EIS is a
reliable method for detection of lipid membrane-damaging effects triggered
by pore-forming proteins or peptides. It was demonstrated by Valincius
and co-workers that formation of the pores causes the decrease in
the measured impedance and the phase angle displays well-pronounced
minimum in the low frequency region.[37] Moreover,
the logarithm of the frequency corresponding to the said minimum can
be correlated with the density of the pores. The results of the EIS
measurements performed with POPG/DPPG/CL fBLM are shown as Bode plot
in Figure . We have
observed that the impedance decreases upon injection of the daptomycin
indicating increased permeability of the membrane. However, the phase
angle plot does not display a minimum in low frequency region. Hence,
this process does not seem to be accompanied by formation of the stable
pores within the lipid membrane. Moreover, the decrease of impedance
is temporal and after 15 min of exposure its value increases above
the initial level. This is commonly interpreted as sealing of the
membrane. However, in this case it might be related to decreased water
content within the interfacial region between the electrode and the
bilayer.
Figure 7
Bode plots presenting logarithm of impedance (squares) and phase
angle (circles) as a function of the frequency for POPG/DPPG/CL fBLM
on gold electrode before (black curve) and after (colored curves)
addition of 3 μM daptomycin. Spectra were collected at the potential
of +0.1 V. The supporting electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution
of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Bode plots presenting logarithm of impedance (squares) and phase
angle (circles) as a function of the frequency for POPG/DPPG/CL fBLM
on gold electrode before (black curve) and after (colored curves)
addition of 3 μM daptomycin. Spectra were collected at the potential
of +0.1 V. The supporting electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution
of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Quartz Crystal Microbalance Studies
For further evaluation
of daptomycin action on negatively charged fBLM, we have used quartz
crystal microbalance which enabled monitoring of the changes in a
frequency (Δf) and energy dissipation (ΔD) of a gold-coated quartz crystal sensor covered by thioglucose
interlayer and lipid membrane. These two parameters allow a conclusion
about the variation in mass and viscoelastic properties of the solid-supported
lipid film.[38,39] The variation in Δf is indicative of either mass loss or gain depending whether
the changes are positive or negative, respectively. The variations
in energy dissipation are related to the changes in the rigidity of
the membrane immobilized on the sensor. Namely, an increase of ΔD reflects the softening of the film, while its stiffening
is characterized by a decrease of ΔD values.
Moreover, by analyzing the frequency and dissipation changes at different
overtones one can conclude about the spatial distribution of mass
and rigidity changes on the sensor surface.[40,41] The response of the sensor at higher overtones is sensitive to those
processes, which occur close to the sensor surface, while the response
at the lower overtones brings information about the changes at the
film-water interface. Figure illustrates how Δf and ΔD changes in time upon exposure of POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer
to daptomycin at 3 μM concentration at the potential of +0.10
V (i.e., ϕtrans = −0.08 V). We can observe
substantial frequency drop accompanied by an increase in dissipation
energy. Such response of the sensor is indicative of daptomycin aggregation,
which is accompanied by the decreased coupling of the lipid membrane
with the sensor. The latter could be explained by daptomycin-induced
interruption of the ordering of lipids resulting from decreased molecular
packing density. Interestingly, the QCM-D data show clearly that the
variations in Δf and ΔD at lower overtones are definitely larger compared to higher overtones.
It means that the changes occurring within the lipid film are more
pronounced in the upper leaflet of the bilayer compared to the region
in the vicinity of the sensor surface.
Figure 8
Quartz crystal microbalance
frequency Δf (solid lines) and energy dissipation
ΔD (dashed
lines) response recorded for thioglucose-modified gold with POPG/DPPG/CL
floating bilayer in the presence of 3 μM daptomycin (A) and
corresponding (ΔD) vs (Δf) plot (B). Lipopeptide was injected into the cell approximately
after 23 min of stabilization of the system (indicated by red arrow
in panel A). The supporting electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution
of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4.
Quartz crystal microbalance
frequency Δf (solid lines) and energy dissipation
ΔD (dashed
lines) response recorded for thioglucose-modified gold with POPG/DPPG/CL
floating bilayer in the presence of 3 μM daptomycin (A) and
corresponding (ΔD) vs (Δf) plot (B). Lipopeptide was injected into the cell approximately
after 23 min of stabilization of the system (indicated by red arrow
in panel A). The supporting electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution
of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride
(2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4.More detailed information on the mechanism of daptomycin action
can be obtained from ΔD versus Δf plots shown in Figure B. Such presentation of the QCM-D can be used as a
fingerprint for the lipopeptide-membrane interaction. Initially the
linear growth of ΔD accompanied by the decrease
of Δf values is observed. This is indicative
of mass accumulation with corresponding loss of the membrane rigidity
and it is interpreted as an adsorption of lipopeptide on the membrane.
This process is very rapid but it slows down after ∼30–40
s. Then, the maximum is observed at ΔD versus
Δf plots followed by small decrease of ΔD. This is indicative of the change in the mechanism of
daptomycin-membrane interaction and it can be interpreted as slow
insertion of the lipopeptide into the lipid bilayer. Clearly, the
upper leaflet is more affected by this process since the changes at
third overtone are definitely much more pronounced compared with higher
overtones. On the basis of this observation, we may assume that lipopeptide
aggregates predominantly in the upper part of the membrane and then
some fraction inserts into the lipid film but its spatial distribution
across the bilayer is nonhomogenous. Another important conclusion
from QCM-D experiments is that the daptomycin does not cause rupture
or dissipation of the membrane. As shown in Figure A, the quasi steady state is reached after
∼20–30 min, and then the mass as well as viscoelastic
properties of the assembly does not vary considerably indicating that
there are no further changes in a membrane structure/organization.
Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging
Daptomycin aggregation
was also verified using atomic force microscopy (AFM). This technique
enables monitoring the changes in the topography of POPG/DPPG/CL bilayers
supported on thioglucose-modified Au(111) electrode after exposure
to lipopeptide. The imaging was performed under in situ conditions. First, the samples were imaged in the absence of lipopeptide
to ensure that the bilayers are stable during repetitive scans. Figure A presents an exemplary
image of intact fBLM at the potential of +0.10 V (i.e., ϕtrans = −0.08 V). Lipid membrane is homogeneous and
covers almost all scanned area. Small membrane spanning defect is
visible in the top section of the image. There are also some topographically
lower regions visible at the borders between the domains where the
molecules are less ordered. The thickness of the lipid membrane was
estimated as an average height difference measured across the defect
sites. Cross-sectional analysis of the images obtained for five independent
samples revealed that the mean thickness of the lipid film is 5.2
± 0.5 nm. This value is in good agreement with previous studies
reporting AFM imaging of lipid bilayers.[42] Then, an aqueous stock solution of daptomycin was injected to reach
the final concentration of lipopeptide of 3 μM and the imaging
was continued.
Figure 9
(A) AFM images presenting intact POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer
deposited
on thioglucose-modified Au(111) electrode; (B) POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer
immediately after injection of daptomycin; (C) POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer
60 min of exposure to daptomycin. All images were acquired in an aqueous
buffer at the potential of +0.10 V. The concentration of daptomycin
was 3 μM. Roman numerals indicate different phases detected
after exposure of the membrane to daptomycin. The supporting electrolyte
was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4. Cross-sectional
profiles taken across the images are shown in Figure S2 in Supporting Information.
(A) AFM images presenting intact POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer
deposited
on thioglucose-modified Au(111) electrode; (B) POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer
immediately after injection of daptomycin; (C) POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer
60 min of exposure to daptomycin. All images were acquired in an aqueous
buffer at the potential of +0.10 V. The concentration of daptomycin
was 3 μM. Roman numerals indicate different phases detected
after exposure of the membrane to daptomycin. The supporting electrolyte
was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium chloride
(100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH = 7.4. Cross-sectional
profiles taken across the images are shown in Figure S2 in Supporting Information.It was found that the exposure of POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer to daptomycin
results in the formation of the elongated aggregates which appear
on top of the membrane immediately after lipopeptide injection (see Figure B). Dimension analysis
revealed that the length of aggregates varies from 50 nm up to 300
nm, while the width is between 15 and 40 nm. The average height of
the aggregates is 6.1 ± 0.6 nm. This dimension corresponds roughly
to the doubled length of daptomycin molecule, which is about 3.2 nm.
Therefore, we propose that aggregates can be described as the assemblies
where lipopeptide molecules are organized into the double-layered
structure with partially interdigitated lipophilic chains to compensate
for the large size of the polar heads. Such organization of lipopeptides
was reported in several research papers.[43−45] At this point,
it should also be stressed that the concentration of daptomycin used
in all experiments is well below critical micelle concentration and
the molecules are fully dispersed in a buffer solution. Therefore,
we conclude that assembly of daptomycin on lipid membrane is a surface-induced
phenomenon driven by lipid–lipopeptide interactions. This statement
is supported by the results of reference experiments, that is, the
imaging of thioglucose-modified gold under the same experimental conditions
did not reveal the formation of aggregates. Moreover, we have observed
that aggregation phenomena on POPG/DPPG/CL bilayer do not occur in
the absence of Ca2+. This proves that aggregation depends
on the synergistic effect of negatively charged lipids and calcium
ions. We believe that our AFM results agree very well with the findings
reported by Lee and co-workers.[46] On the
basis of circular dichroism (CD) studies, these authors have demonstrated
that daptomycin is in the monomeric form before membrane binding at
therapeutic micromolar concentrations and it has a unique CD state
independent of calcium ion concentrations. However, the daptomycin
has another unique CD state after binding to PG-containing membranes
with calcium ions, possibly in a form of oligomers or aggregates bound
with lipids. Nevertheless, the partitioning of some fraction of daptomycin
molecules into the fBLM cannot be excluded, as can be deduced from
QCM-D results. Continuous AFM imaging of the POPG/DPPG/CL membrane
revealed that the structure of the assemblies evolves in time and
noticeable fraction of daptomycin aggregates merge with lipid bilayer.
The resulting film morphology is shown in high-resolution image in Figure C, where three different
phases can be distinguished. Phase I is ascribed to the area where
the bilayer morphology seems to be unchanged. Phase II indicates the
domain, which is on average ∼0.4 nm lower compared to phase
I and it displays visible undulations. Finally, phase III has similar
morphology as phase II but this region is ∼1.0 nm lower compared
to phase I. Such changes in morphology of the lipid membrane indicate
that certain population of lipopeptide molecules is released from
aggregates and inserts into the lipid bilayer. As can be deduced from
AFM image shown in Figure Cdaptomycin insertion affects the ordering of the molecules
within lipid assembly since the thickness of the film is decreased.
The observed corrugation may indicate that after insertion of daptomycin,
the molecules within the film try to rearrange to accommodate lipophilic
chains of lipopeptide and compensate for its bulky head groups. As
a result, certain curvature is induced locally in the membrane giving
rise to undulations. This observation seems to be in line with the
postulate that daptomycin induces positive curvature strain on the
lipids.[14] Assuming that such a scenario
is valid, phase II can be ascribed to the bilayer domain where daptomycin
insertion affected predominantly the upper leaflet, while phase III
corresponds to a more disordered region where some fraction of the
lipopeptide is present in both leaflets. Such interpretation would
be in line with QCM-D fingerprints, which demonstrated that lipopeptide
inserts into the membrane to some extent, however, noticeably larger
fraction seems to be accumulated in the upper part of the bilayer.
Another important information gained from AFM imaging is that the
continuity of the membrane is preserved even upon daptomycin insertion.
Hence, the AFM results support the conclusion that membrane disruption
does not take place after daptomycin aggregation. This is in line
with the findings reported by Cotroneo and co-workers who demonstrated
that daptomycin bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus
aureus is accompanied by negligible cell lysis and no membrane
discontinuities have been detected by electron microscopy.[47]In
order to get molecular-scale insight into the mechanisms of daptomycin
action on negatively charged fBLM, we have employed surface-enhanced
infrared absorption spectroscopy (SEIRAS).[48,49] This method takes advantage of the fact that infrared absorption
intensity can be significantly enhanced by 10–1000 times on
nanoparticles of coinage metals due to the polarization of metal nanoparticles
by the electromagnetic field of the incident light. The latter induces
an oscillating dipole in the metal nanoparticle through excitation
of localized plasmon. Further, the induced dipole produces an electric
field around the nanoparticle and excites the absorbed molecules.
The induced electric field is normal to the local metal surface, which
implies that only those molecular vibrations where transition dipole
moment has component normal to the local surface can be excited and
enhanced. On the basis of such surface selection rule, one can conclude
about the orientation of adsorbed molecules with respect to the surface.
Importantly, the local electric field decays within a short distance
away from the surface. It means that local enhancement occurs only
in the vicinity of the metallic islands and a dominant contribution
comes from the species close to the metal surface. For this reason,
SEIRAS can provide information about the amount and the structure
of interfacial water. Figure illustrates the differential spectra collected for POPG/DPPG/CL
fBLM during its exposure to daptomycin action, while the potential
applied to the gold electrode was held at +0.1 V. The spectra recorded
before injection of the lipopeptide was used as reference. Daptomycin
binding to the membrane is confirmed by relatively well-developed
bands located at ∼1653 and ∼1531 cm–1. The position of these bands correlates very well with amide I and
amide II bands observed in daptomycin IR spectra. Interaction of daptomycin
with lipid membrane resulted in emergence of negative ν(OH)
band with global minimum at ∼3350 cm–1 indicative
of loss of hydrogen-bonded water.[50] This
band is most likely accompanied by a weak negative δ(HOH) band
near 1645 cm–1, but in this case it is probably
overlapped with relatively strong positive amide I band from daptomycin.
Nevertheless, the appearance of the negative ν(OH) band demonstrates
that lipopeptide aggregation leads to the partial dehydration of the
lipid polar heads. Additionally, the loss of water from the region
between the membrane and thioglucose may also contribute to the emergence
of the negative ν(OH) band, since the SEIRAS is more sensitive
to the changes in the direct vicinity of the electrode. Such interpretation
is in line with the results of EIS measurements where the decrease
of the capacitance of the submembrane region was observed. Hence,
the negative ν(OH) band could be related to the efflux of water
molecules from the interfacial region between the membrane and thioglucose
interlayer to the outer plane of the bilayer and/or bulk of the solution.
Daptomycin initially adsorbs on top of the membrane and lipopeptide
molecules may displace water bound to phosphates and carbonyl groups.
Hence the chemical potential of water in the polar head region of
the upper leaflet is lower compared to the polar head region of the
proximal leaflet. This in turn may result in a situation similar to
that when the membrane experiences osmotic stress.[51] As a consequence, the gradient of chemical potential drives
the flux of water molecules across the membrane. It should also be
noted that daptomycin binding resulted in the emergence of positive
bands related to ν(C–H) and ester ν(C=O)
stretching vibrations. Both may originate from aggregated daptomycin,
or alternatively, indicate the change in the orientation of lipids.
In the latter case, it would imply that lipid molecules are tilting
upon lipopeptide binding and the membrane becomes thinner or more
disordered, which is consistent with QCM-D and AFM results. Such behavior
is reasonable in the view of the previously discussed effect of water
replacement by lipopeptide. The latter may affect the orientation
of the lipids, which in turn locally changes their packing and can
lead to the formation of defects facilitating the passage of water.
Figure 10
Time
evolution of SEIRA spectra recorded at the potential of +0.1
V for thioglucose-modified gold with POPG/DPPG/CL floating bilayer
upon exposure to 3 μM daptomycin. The reference spectrum was
recorded for the same system before injection of daptomycin. The supporting
electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium
chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH =
7.4.
Time
evolution of SEIRA spectra recorded at the potential of +0.1
V for thioglucose-modified gold with POPG/DPPG/CL floating bilayer
upon exposure to 3 μM daptomycin. The reference spectrum was
recorded for the same system before injection of daptomycin. The supporting
electrolyte was an aqueous buffer solution of HEPES (10 mM), potassium
chloride (100 mM), and calcium dichloride (2 mM) adjusted to pH =
7.4.
Conclusions
In
this paper, we have used a multitechnique experimental approach
to follow how daptomycin interacts with a negatively charged membrane
composed of POPG/DPPG/CL (1:1:2). Surface pressure measurements with
monolayers at the air–buffer interface demonstrated that daptomycin
shows the ability to bind and insert into the lipid films. Simultaneously,
it changes the packing density of the molecules causing moderate fluidization
of the membrane manifested by an increase in mean molecular area and
decrease of compression modulus. This observation was confirmed by
further experiments under electrochemical control for fBLMs immobilized
on gold electrodes premodified with thioglucose. As revealed by QCM-D
data obtained at ϕtrans = −0.08 V, daptomycin
aggregates quickly on top of the lipid membrane and this process is
followed by slow insertion of the lipopeptide into fBLM. This leads
to the softening of the film, however, the overall change in mass
and the viscoelastic properties is more pronounced for an upper leaflet,
which demonstrates that larger fraction of the lipopeptide accumulates
in the upper part of the bilayer. AFM imaging fully confirms such
a scenario, since the formation of aggregates on top of the fBLM is
observed immediately after daptomycin injection. Further changes in
bilayer morphology strongly suggest possible partitioning of the lipopeptide
into the membrane. Interestingly, electrochemical measurements revealed
that the exposure of fBLM to daptomycin at ϕtrans = −0.08 V leads to a substantial redistribution of the charge
resulting in membrane depolarization. It is accompanied by the directional
flux of water from the submembrane region to the bulk as proved by
SEIRAS measurements. On the basis of the analysis of our results,
we have concluded that lipopeptide mode of action is complex and initially
it involves relatively fast adsorption of daptomycin in a form of
aggregated assemblies. At this stage, lipopeptide binds to the lipids
and concomitantly displaces water molecules bound to the polar heads.
This process has multiple consequences. First of all, the charge distribution
across the membrane is changed since the excessive negative charge
is accumulated in the upper leaflet the fBLM. This way the potential
gradient across the membrane is lowered. Second, the binding of daptomycin
affects the orientation of lipids and molecular ordering. The latter
facilitates lipopeptide insertion, and as a consequence the membrane
curvature pronounced as corrugation is produced. Such local changes
in packing can lead to the formation of defects which increase the
permeability of the membrane for water and small ionic species. Moreover,
since the water molecules are displaced during lipopeptide binding
in the upper leaflet, it can be expected that a certain gradient of
water chemical potential across the membrane is created,[45] which in turn drives the temporal efflux of
water from the submembrane region. Nevertheless, the temporarily increased
permeation of water/ions is not associated with the formation of stable
pores but rather stems from local disordering of the lipid film. Such
a scenario seems to contradict the generally accepted model of pore-forming
activity of daptomycin. However, it should be noted that our model
system contains a relatively large fraction of palmitoyl lipids, which
do not support membrane permeabilization.[52] Also cardiolipin, which is present in our model system, was demonstrated
to prevent daptomycin translocation into the inner leaflet of the
membrane.[53] This may explain the lack of
pore-forming activity and preferential accumulation of daptomycin
in the outer leaflet of the membrane observed in this work. Nevertheless,
our results show that even in the presence of palmitoyl lipids and
cardiolipins daptomycin is still able to depolarize the membrane and
temporarily increase its permeability. Moreover, the observation of
daptomycin-induced changes in the orientation of lipids and/or molecular
ordering may have important implications for natural membranes since
the localization of proteins involved in cell division and cell wall
synthesis may be affected this way.
Authors: Lawrence I Mortin; Tongchuan Li; Andrew D G Van Praagh; Shuxin Zhang; Xi-Xian Zhang; Jeff D Alder Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Steven Kirkham; Valeria Castelletto; Ian William Hamley; Katsuaki Inoue; Robert Rambo; Mehedi Reza; Janne Ruokolainen Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 3.102