Literature DB >> 3233783

Evaluation of genetic counselling: recall of information, post-counselling reproduction, and attitude of the counsellees.

M Somer1, H Mustonen, R Norio.   

Abstract

Of the families who had received genetic counselling between 1972 and 1981, 791 replied to a questionnaire which covered recall of information, post-counselling reproduction and attitudes towards counselling and prenatal diagnosis. Eighty percent had adequate knowledge of mode of inheritance and 74% of recurrence risk. Knowledge of mode of inheritance was poorest in multifactorial transmission (63%) and knowledge of recurrence risk in X-chromosomal disorders (61%). Forty-five per cent of the families had started a pregnancy after the counselling. 25%). Early lethality of the disorder and feasibility of a prenatal study contributed to positive reproductive decisions. Nine per cent of the children born after the counselling were affected by the disorder in question. The observed risks tended to match well with the expected ones. Sixty-two per cent of the respondents felt that the counselling had had a great or moderate impact on their reproductive plans. Forty-two per cent expressed a wish to hear the counsellor's opinion in addition to the facts. This was more common when the disorder was severe. Although most couples (53%) wished to have a prenatal study, if feasible, and abort an affected foetus, 16% were against abortion in such a case and 31% wished to have the study but were ambiguous about an abortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3233783     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1988.tb02893.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  15 in total

1.  Attitudes toward genetic testing for cystic fibrosis among college students.

Authors:  Ran Neiger; Dianne N Abuelo; Mary Ann Passero
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counseling: the impact in Indian milieu.

Authors:  Shubha R Phadke; Amita Pandey; Ratna Dua Puri; S J Patil
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  A practical account of autonomy: why genetic counseling is especially well suited to the facilitation of informed autonomous decision making.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Merle Spriggs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain.

Authors:  C G Palmer; F Sainfort
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Comparison of genetic services with and without genetic registers: knowledge, adjustment, and attitudes about genetic counselling among probands referred to three genetic clinics.

Authors:  C Wright; L Kerzin-Storrar; P R Williamson; A Fryer; A Njindou; O Quarrell; D Donnai; D Craufurd
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Impact of hereditary pancreatitis on patients and their families.

Authors:  Celeste A Shelton; Robin E Grubs; Chandraprakash Umapathy; Dhiraj Yadav; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  An assessment of risk understanding in Hispanic genetic counseling patients.

Authors:  Jennifer N Eichmeyer; Hope Northrup; Michael A Assel; Thomas J Goka; Dennis A Johnston; Aimee Tucker Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic diagnosis: present and prospects.

Authors:  A Robinson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Non-syndromic sensorineural prelingual deafness: the importance of genetic counseling in demystifying parents' beliefs about the cause of their children's deafness.

Authors:  Fidjy Rodrigues; Milena Paneque; Cláudia Reis; Margarida Venâncio; Jorge Sequeiros; Jorge Saraiva
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.