Literature DB >> 32336555

Invasive central venous monitoring during hepatic resection: unnecessary for most patients.

David C O'Connor1, Kenneth Seier2, Mithat Gonen2, Patrick J McCormick3, Camilo Correa-Gallego3, Benjamin Parker3, Emily Weiser3, Vinod P Balachandran4, Ronald P Dematteo3, Michael D'Angelica3, Peter T Kingham3, Peter J Allen3, Jeffrey A Drebin4, William R Jarnagin3, Mary E Fischer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low central venous pressure (LCVP) anesthesia reduces blood loss during hepatic resection and historically has required a central venous catheter (CVC) for intra-operative monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an evolution of practice to CVP monitoring without CVC on the perioperative outcomes after liver resection.
METHODS: A retrospective study of partial hepatectomy patients from 2007 to 2016 who were over 18 years of age was performed.
RESULTS: Of 3903 patients having partial hepatectomy, 2445 (62%) met inclusion criteria, and 404 (16%) had a CVC. Overall morbidity (33% non-CVC vs 38% CVC P = 0.076), major morbidity (16% vs 20% P = 0.067), and infective complications (superficial wound infection) 3% vs 4% P = 0.429; deep wound infection (5% vs 6% P = 0.720) did not differ between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, and major complications were not associated with the presence of a CVC. All-cause mortality at 90 days was associated with CVC presence (OR 3.45, CI 1.74-6.85, P = 0.001) and age (OR 1.05, CI 1.02-1.08, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Since the adoption of non-invasive CVP monitoring, there has been no increase in adverse peri-operative outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32336555      PMCID: PMC7581625          DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  11 in total

1.  Central venous pressure in optimal blood volume maintenance.

Authors:  J N WILSON; J B GROW; C V DEMONG; A E PREVEDEL; J C OWENS
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1962-10

2.  The relationship between right atrial pressure and blood volume.

Authors:  R E HUGHES; G J MAGOVERN
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1959-08

3.  Optimal Fluid Resuscitation after Liver Resection: An Evolving Concept: In Reply to Geerts and colleagues.

Authors:  Camilo Correa-Gallego; William R Jarnagin; Mary E Fischer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  V. Notes on the Arrest of Hepatic Hemorrhage Due to Trauma.

Authors:  J H Pringle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1908-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Perioperative outcomes of major hepatic resections under low central venous pressure anesthesia: blood loss, blood transfusion, and the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction.

Authors:  J A Melendez; V Arslan; M E Fischer; D Wuest; W R Jarnagin; Y Fong; L H Blumgart
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Trends in Central Venous Catheter Insertions by Anesthesia Providers: An Analysis of the Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary From 2007 to 2016.

Authors:  Daniel S Rubin; Jeffrey L Apfelbaum; Avery Tung
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 7.  Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Tajender Vasu; Amyn Hirani
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  One hundred consecutive hepatic resections. Blood loss, transfusion, and operative technique.

Authors:  J D Cunningham; Y Fong; C Shriver; J Melendez; W L Marx; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-10

10.  Hepatic parenchymal preservation surgery: decreasing morbidity and mortality rates in 4,152 resections for malignancy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Michael I D'Angelica; Mithat Gönen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Peter J Allen; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.