Literature DB >> 7944934

One hundred consecutive hepatic resections. Blood loss, transfusion, and operative technique.

J D Cunningham1, Y Fong, C Shriver, J Melendez, W L Marx, L H Blumgart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection is prone to significant blood loss. Adverse effects of blood loss and transfusion mandate improvements in surgical techniques to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements.
METHODS: One hundred hepatic resections were carried out using a standard surgical technique that includes control of the hilar structures, extrahepatic control of the hepatic veins, and use of the Pringle maneuver. Low central venous pressure and Trendelenburg positioning were used during parenchymal transection. Data were collected retrospectively in the first 36 patients, whereas data were collected prospectively in the remaining 64 patients.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 3%. Median blood loss was 450, 700, 1000, 1100, and 1500 mL for segmental, nonanatomic, lobar, extended right, and extended left resections, respectively. Major resections were more likely than minor resections to be transfused with albumin (P = .008), fresh frozen plasma (P = .009), and packed red blood cells or whole blood (P = .04). Overall transfusion of packed red blood cells or whole blood occurred in 59 of 100 patients. In the 64 patients who were followed up prospectively, the predeposit of autologous blood decreased the need for homologous transfusions from 56% to 38%. A further reduction in the transfusion rate of 25% could have been possible if all patients in the prospective group had donated 2 U of autologous blood. Patients who predeposited blood were more likely to receive transfusions and to have had a transfusion more than 24 hours after surgery than were patients who did not donate blood.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical techniques used results in acceptable blood loss and transfusion requirements for hepatic resection. This approach is safe, cost-effective, reproducible, and applicable for widespread use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7944934     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420340064011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  60 in total

1.  Hepatic vascular exclusion with preservation of the caval flow for liver resections.

Authors:  D Cherqui; B Malassagne; P I Colau; F Brunetti; N Rotman; P L Fagniez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Use of a bipolar vessel-sealing device for parenchymal transection during liver surgery.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; David Linehan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Protection of the liver during hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jean Emond; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Jacques Belghiti; Ravi S Chari; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Hepatic surgery using the Ligasure vessel sealing system.

Authors:  Fabrizio Romano; Claudio Franciosi; Roberto Caprotti; Fabio Uggeri; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Intermittent hepatic vein--total vascular exclusion during liver resection: anatomic and clinical studies.

Authors:  Shawn MacKenzie; Elijah Dixon; Oliver Bathe; Francis Sutherland
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  How should transection of the liver be performed?: a prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients: comparing four different transection strategies.

Authors:  Mickael Lesurtel; Markus Selzner; Henrik Petrowsky; Lucas McCormack; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Intraoperative blood salvage during liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Takuya Hashimoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Ryo Orii; Yasuji Seyama; Keiji Sano; Hiroshi Imamura; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Autologous versus allogeneic transfusions: no difference in perioperative outcome after partial hepatectomy. Autologous transfusion on hepatectomy outcome.

Authors:  James O Park; Mithat Gonen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; David Wuest; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Ruminations of an ordinary hepatic surgeon: a journey through the pitfalls of major liver resections.

Authors:  Thomas S Helling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Early outcome following hepatic resection in patients older than 80 years of age.

Authors:  Ken Shirabe; Kiyoshi Kajiyama; Norifumi Harimoto; Tomonobu Gion; Eiji Tsujita; Tomoyuki Abe; Shigeki Wakiyama; Takashi Nagaie; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.