Literature DB >> 9849736

Perioperative outcomes of major hepatic resections under low central venous pressure anesthesia: blood loss, blood transfusion, and the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction.

J A Melendez1, V Arslan, M E Fischer, D Wuest, W R Jarnagin, Y Fong, L H Blumgart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that maintenance of a low central venous pressure (LCVP) combined with extrahepatic control of venous outflow reduced the overall blood loss during major hepatic resections. This study examined the overall outcomes and, in particular, renal morbidity associated with a large series of consecutive major liver resections performed with this approach. In addition, the rationale for the anesthetic management to maintain LCVP was carefully reviewed. STUDY
DESIGN: All major hepatectomies performed between December 1991 and April 1997 were reviewed. The prospective Hepatobiliary Surgical Service database was merged with the Memorial Hospital Laboratory and Blood Bank databases to yield the nature of the operation, blood loss, blood product transfusions, outcomes, and levels of preoperative, postoperative, and discharge serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen.
RESULTS: A total of 496 LCVP-assisted major liver resections were performed, with no intraoperative deaths and an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.8%. The median blood loss was 645 mL. Sixty-seven percent of the patients did not require perioperative blood transfusion during surgery and the immediate 12 hours after surgery. The median number of blood transfusions was 2. Only 3% of the patients experienced a persistent and clinically significant increase in serum creatinine possibly attributable to the anesthetic technique. Renal failure directly attributable to the anesthetic technique did not occur.
CONCLUSIONS: Major resection with LCVP allowed easy control of the hepatic veins before and during parenchymal transection. The anesthetic technique, designed to maintain LCVP during the critical stages of hepatic resection, not only helped to minimize blood loss and mortality but also preserved renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9849736     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00240-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  121 in total

1.  Comparative study of perioperative management of hepatic resection.

Authors:  K Akashi; S Mizuno; S Isaji
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Factors in perioperative care that determine blood loss in liver surgery.

Authors:  Stephen J McNally; Erica J Revie; Lisa J Massie; Dermot W McKeown; Rowan W Parks; O James Garden; Stephen J Wigmore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Differences between bipolar compression and ultrasonic devices for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Nsehniitooh A Mbah; Russell E Brown; Matthew R Bower; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  [Intraoperative surgical and anesthesiological problems and the consequences for surgery].

Authors:  J Beckmann; B Bein; M Steinfath; T Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Hughes; Nicholas T Ventham; Ewen M Harrison; Stephen J Wigmore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Hepatic surgery using the Ligasure vessel sealing system.

Authors:  Fabrizio Romano; Claudio Franciosi; Roberto Caprotti; Fabio Uggeri; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  How should transection of the liver be performed?: a prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients: comparing four different transection strategies.

Authors:  Mickael Lesurtel; Markus Selzner; Henrik Petrowsky; Lucas McCormack; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Elevated Lactate is Independently Associated with Adverse Outcomes Following Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Madeline Lemke; Paul J Karanicolas; Rogeh Habashi; Ramy Behman; Natalie G Coburn; Sherif S Hanna; Calvin H L Law; Julie Hallet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Intraoperative blood salvage during liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Takuya Hashimoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Ryo Orii; Yasuji Seyama; Keiji Sano; Hiroshi Imamura; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Radiofrequency vessel-sealing system versus the clamp-crushing technique in liver transection: results of a prospective randomized study on 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Andrea Muratore; Alfredo Mellano; Giuseppe Tarantino; Patrizia Marsanic; Michele De Simone; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.