| Literature DB >> 32334570 |
Sandra Sauer1, Petra Pavel2, Anita Schmitt3, Martin Cremer3, Mark Kriegsmann4, Thomas Bruckner5, Karin Jordan3, Patrick Wuchter6, Carsten Müller-Tidow3, Katharina Kriegsmann3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-dose (HD) chemotherapy followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, the collection of sufficient peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts can be challenging, and the question arises whether reinfusion of low-dose grafts will lead to a hematopoietic recovery.Entities:
Keywords: Autologous stem-cell transplantation; Insufficient graft; Multiple myeloma; Peripheral blood stem cells
Year: 2020 PMID: 32334570 PMCID: PMC7183692 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06873-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Patient characteristics and previous therapy regimens
| Parameter | Overall cohort | Group1 (3–4 × 10 | Group 2 (2–2.5 × 10 | Group 3 (< 2 × 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 148 | 86 | 53 | / | 9 | |
| Male | 87 (59) | 44 (51) | 37 (70) | 6 (67) | |
| Female | 61 (41) | 42 (49) | 16 (30) | 3 (33) | |
| Median age at first diagnosis, years (range) | 60 (41–72) | 60 (44–72) | 61 (41–71) | 0.854 | 60 (46–72) |
| Stage at first diagnosis | / | ||||
| I | 7 (5) | 4 (5) | 3 (6) | 9 (100) | |
| II | 4 (3) | 3 (3) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | |
| III | 136 (92) | 79 (92) | 48 (91) | 0 (0) | |
| NA | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | |
| A | 129 (87) | 78 (91) | 44 (83) | / | 7 (78) |
| B | 18 (12) | 8 (9) | 8 (15) | 2 (22) | |
| NA | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | |
| Heavy chain type | 0.767a | ||||
| IgG | 95 (64) | 56 (65) | 37 (70) | 2 (22) | |
| IgA | 29 (20) | 17 (20) | 8 (15) | 4 (44) | |
| IgD | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Light chain only | 23 (16) | 12 (14) | 8 (15) | 3 (33) | |
| Light chain type | 0.452 | ||||
| kappa | 96 (65) | 53 (62) | 36 (68) | 7 (78) | |
| lambda | 52 (35) | 33 (38) | 17 (32) | 2 (22) | |
| Median number of cycles (range) | 4 (2–8) | 4 (2–6) | 4 (3–8) | 4 (3–5) | |
| VCD | 70 (47) | 39 (45) | 28 (53) | 0.297b | 3 (33) |
| VRD | 30 (20) | 22 (26) | 8 (15) | 0 (0) | |
| Elotuzumab-VRd | 33 (22) | 22 (26) | 10 (19) | 1 (11) | |
| Other/modifications | 15 (10) | 3 (3) | 7 (13) | 5 (56) | |
| / | |||||
| 1xCAD | 143 (97) | 85 (99) | 50 (94) | 8 (89) | |
| Other | 5 (3) | 1 (1) | 3 (6) | 1 (11) | |
| nCR | 25 (17) | 19 (22) | 5 (9) | 1 (11) | |
| VGPR | 52 (35) | 34 (40) | 17 (32) | 1 (11) | |
| PR | 54 (36) | 25 (29) | 25 (47) | 4 (44) | |
| MR | 8 (5) | 5 (6) | 2 (4) | 1 (11) | |
| SD | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| NA | 8 (5) | 2 (2) | 4 (8) | 2 (22) | |
aIgD not included
bOther/modifications not included
cnCR/VGPR versus PR/MR/SD
CAD cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone; MM multiple myeloma; MR minimal response; NA not available; nCR near complete remission; PBSC peripheral blood stem cells; PR partial remission; SD stable disease; VCD bortezomib, VGPR very good partial remission; VRD(d) vincristine, lenalidomide (revlimid), dexamethasone; cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone; vs., versus
High-dose chemotherapy/ASCT
| Parameter | Overall cohort | Group 1 (3–4 × 10 | Group 2 (2–2.5 × 10 | Group 3 (< 2 × 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 148 | 86 | 53 | / | 9 | |
| / | |||||
| First | 142 (96) | 86 (100) | 53 (100) | 3 (33) | |
| Second | 5 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 (56) | |
| Third | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (11) | |
| 0.168a | |||||
| CR | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| nCR | 38 (26) | 28 (33) | 9 (17) | 1 (11) | |
| VGPR | 48 (32) | 26 (30) | 21 (40) | 1 (11) | |
| PR | 45 (30) | 21 (24) | 18 (34) | 6 (67) | |
| MR | 4 (3) | 3 (3) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | |
| SD | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | |
| PD | 6 (4) | 2 (2) | 3 (6) | 1 (11) | |
| NA | 4 (3) | 4 (5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| 61 (41–75) | 61 (44–73) | 62 (41–72) | 0.886 | 60 (50–75) | |
| Median transplanted CD34+ cells ×106/kg (range) | 3.2 (1.7–4.0) | 3.6 (3.0–4.0) | 2.3 (2.0–2.5) | 1.9 (1.7–1.99) | |
| Median vitality, % (range) | 79 (53–93) | 76 (53–93) | 81 (58–93) | 0.012 | 80 (66–93) |
| / | |||||
| Melphalan 2 × 100 mg/m2 | 146 (99) | 85 (99) | 53 (100) | 8 (89) | |
| Dose reduction | 2 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (11) | |
| 0.316b | |||||
| CR | 15 (10) | 11 (13) | 4 (8) | 0 (0) | |
| nCR | 42 (28) | 30 (35) | 11 (21) | 1 (11) | |
| VGPR | 54 (36) | 27 (31) | 22 (42) | 5 (56) | |
| PR | 25 (17) | 11 (13) | 12 (23) | 2 (22) | |
| MR | 5 (3) | 3 (3) | 2 (4) | 0 (0) | |
| SD | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| PD | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| NA | 4 (3) | 1 (1) | 2 (4) | 1 (11) | |
a/bCR/nCR/VGPR versus PR/MR/SD/PD.
ASCT autologous blood stem cell transplantation; CR complete remission; HD high-dose; MR minimal response; NA not available; nCR near complete remission; PD progressive disease; PR partial remission; SD stable disease; VGPR very good partial remission; vs., versus
Hematopoietic reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy/ASCT by number of transplanted CD34+ cells
| Parameter | Overall cohort | Group 1 (3–4 × 10 | Group 2 (2–2.5 × 10 | Group 3 (< 2 × 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 148 | 86 | 53 | 9 | ||
| 0.271 | |||||
| Yes | 62 (42) | 34 (40) | 26 (49) | 2 (22) | |
| No | 86 (58) | 52 (60) | 27 (51) | 7 (78) | |
| 0.393 | |||||
| n available | 144 | 82 | 53 | 9 | |
| Days to L ≥ 1.0 × 109/L | 12 (9–24) | 12 (9–23) | 12 (10–24) | 12 (9–16) | |
| / | |||||
| n available | 42 | 17 | 23 | 2 | |
| Days to | 14 (9–19) | 14 (9–19) | 13 (10–18) | 13 (11–14) | |
| 0.513 | |||||
| n available | 116 | 62 | 46 | 8 | |
| Days in aplasia | 9 (4–20) | 9 (4–19) | 8 (5–20) | 9 (5–13) | |
| n available | 144 | 85 | 51 | 8 | |
| Days to platelets ≥20 × 109/L | 12 (9–21) | 11 (9–16) | 13 (10–21) | 13 (9–19) | |
| n available | 81 | 55 | 23 | 3 | |
| Days to platelets ≥50 × 109/L | 14 (10–22) | 14 (10–18) | 14 (13–22) | 15 (13–18) |
If not otherwise indicated, the data are presented as the median (range)
ASCT autologous blood stem cell transplantation; G-CSF granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; L leukocytes, NA not available; N neutrophils; vs., versus
Fig. 1Hematopoietic reconstitution after HD/ASCT by the number of reinfused CD34+ cells. The relative number of patients with leukocyte recovery ≥1.0 × 109/L (a) and platelet recovery ≥20 × 109/L (b) is shown. The results are grouped according to the number of reinfused CD34+ cells (3–4 versus 2–2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg bw)
Fig. 2Hematopoietic reconstitution after HD/ASCT by the number of reinfused CD34+ cells and by G-CSF support status. The relative number of patients with leukocyte recovery ≥1.0 × 109/L (a) and platelet recovery ≥20 × 109/L (b) is shown. The results are grouped according to the number of reinfused CD34+ cells (3–4 versus 2–2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg bw) and G-CSF support status
Hematopoietic reconstitution - multivariate analysis
| Parameter | Leukocyte reconstitution (≥1.0 × 10 | Aplasia | Platelet reconstitution (≥20 × 10 | Platelet reconstitution (≥50 × 10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 130 | 103 | 131 | 76 | |||||
| 1.038 (0.730–1.476) | 0.837 | 1.101 (0.725–1.669) | 0.652 | 1.086 (0.762–1.547) | 0.649 | 0.841 (0.529–1.336) | 0.463 | |
| 0.989 (0.681–1.436) | 0.952 | 1.129 (0.735–1.734) | 0.581 | 1.098 (0.755–1.598) | 0.625 | 1.060 (0.650–1.729) | 0.815 | |
| 16.742 (8.514–32.923) | 9.634 (5.425–17.107) | 1.365 (0.951–1.958) | 0.091 | 1.084 (0.655–1.794) | 0.753 | |||
| 0.607 (0.416–0.885) | 0.573 (0.375–0.875) | 0.438 (0.299–0.642) | 0.442 (0.258–0.755) | |||||
ASCT autologous blood stem cell transplantation; CI confidence interval; CR complete remission; HR hazard ratio; G-CSF granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; MR minimal response; nCR near complete remission; PD progressive disease; PR partial remission; SD stable disease; VGPR very good partial remission; vs., versus