INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide (LEN) is a relatively new and very effective therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Prior LEN therapy is associated with an increased risk of peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) failure, particularly with filgrastim (G-CSF) alone. We performed a retrospective chart review of 319 consecutive MM patients who underwent apheresis to collect PBSCs for the first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). RESULTS: The median number of PBSCs collected in the LEN (+) group was significantly less than the LEN (-) group (6.34 vs. 7.52 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg; p = 0.0004). In addition, the median number of apheresis sessions required for adequate PBSCs collection were significantly more in the LEN (+) group as compared to LEN (-) group (2 vs. 1 sessions; p = 0.002). In the LEN (+) group, there was a negative correlation between PBSCs collected and prior number of cycles of LEN (p = 0.0001). Rate of PBSC collection failure was 9% in the LEN (+) group and 5% in the LEN (-) group (p = 0.16). Only six patients who failed PBSC collection with G-CSF were able to collect adequate PBSCs with G-CSF + plerixafor. LEN exposure had no effect on neutrophil or platelet recovery post-ASCT. CONCLUSIONS: Up to four cycles of LEN exposure have minimal negative impact on PBSC collection. Despite prolong exposure of LEN, PBSC collection was adequate for two ASCTs in the majority of patients and post-ASCT engraftment was not longer than expected; however, clinical relevance (complication rate, quality of life, cost) of prolonged LEN exposure on both PBSC and ASCT, should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION:Lenalidomide (LEN) is a relatively new and very effective therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Prior LEN therapy is associated with an increased risk of peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) failure, particularly with filgrastim (G-CSF) alone. We performed a retrospective chart review of 319 consecutive MMpatients who underwent apheresis to collect PBSCs for the first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). RESULTS: The median number of PBSCs collected in the LEN (+) group was significantly less than the LEN (-) group (6.34 vs. 7.52 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg; p = 0.0004). In addition, the median number of apheresis sessions required for adequate PBSCs collection were significantly more in the LEN (+) group as compared to LEN (-) group (2 vs. 1 sessions; p = 0.002). In the LEN (+) group, there was a negative correlation between PBSCs collected and prior number of cycles of LEN (p = 0.0001). Rate of PBSC collection failure was 9% in the LEN (+) group and 5% in the LEN (-) group (p = 0.16). Only six patients who failed PBSC collection with G-CSF were able to collect adequate PBSCs with G-CSF + plerixafor. LEN exposure had no effect on neutrophil or platelet recovery post-ASCT. CONCLUSIONS: Up to four cycles of LEN exposure have minimal negative impact on PBSC collection. Despite prolong exposure of LEN, PBSC collection was adequate for two ASCTs in the majority of patients and post-ASCT engraftment was not longer than expected; however, clinical relevance (complication rate, quality of life, cost) of prolonged LEN exposure on both PBSC and ASCT, should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.
Authors: David H Chang; Nancy Liu; Virginia Klimek; Hani Hassoun; Amitabha Mazumder; Stephen D Nimer; Sundar Jagannath; Madhav V Dhodapkar Journal: Blood Date: 2006-03-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: W Bensinger; F Appelbaum; S Rowley; R Storb; J Sanders; K Lilleby; T Gooley; T Demirer; K Schiffman; C Weaver Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Attal; J L Harousseau; A M Stoppa; J J Sotto; J G Fuzibet; J F Rossi; P Casassus; H Maisonneuve; T Facon; N Ifrah; C Payen; R Bataille Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Meletios Dimopoulos; Andrew Spencer; Michael Attal; H Miles Prince; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Anna Dmoszynska; Jesus San Miguel; Andrzej Hellmann; Thierry Facon; Robin Foà; Alessandro Corso; Zvenyslava Masliak; Marta Olesnyckyj; Zhinuan Yu; John Patin; Jerome B Zeldis; Robert D Knight Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ruben Niesvizky; Tara Naib; Paul J Christos; David Jayabalan; Jessica R Furst; Jessica Jalbrzikowski; Faiza Zafar; Tomer Mark; Richard Lent; Roger N Pearse; Scott Ely; John P Leonard; Madhu Mazumdar; Selina Chen-Kiang; Morton Coleman Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: S Kumar; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; S R Hayman; F K Buadi; D A Gastineau; M R Litzow; R Fonseca; V Roy; S V Rajkumar; M A Gertz Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-06-21 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: G Tricot; S Jagannath; D Vesole; J Nelson; S Tindle; L Miller; B Cheson; J Crowley; B Barlogie Journal: Blood Date: 1995-01-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Ki-Ryang Koh; Martin Janz; Markus Y Mapara; Britt Lemke; David Stirling; Bernd Dörken; Martin Zenke; Suzanne Lentzsch Journal: Blood Date: 2004-08-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael J Buege; Anita Kumar; Brianne N Dixon; Laura A Tang; Terry Pak; Jennifer Orozco; Tim J Peterson; Kathryn T Maples Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Christopher Lemieux; Lori S Muffly; David J Iberri; Juliana K Craig; Laura J Johnston; Robert Lowsky; Parveen Shiraz; Andrew R Rezvani; Matthew J Frank; Wen-Kai Weng; Everett Meyer; Judith A Shizuru; Sally Arai; Michaela Liedtke; Robert S Negrin; David B Miklos; Surbhi Sidana Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 5.174
Authors: Sandra Sauer; Petra Pavel; Anita Schmitt; Martin Cremer; Mark Kriegsmann; Thomas Bruckner; Karin Jordan; Patrick Wuchter; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Katharina Kriegsmann Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 4.430