Thomas Schmitt1, Hartmut Goldschmidt2, Kai Neben2, Anja Freiberger2, Johannes Hüsing2, Martina Gronkowski2, Markus Thalheimer2, Le Hang Pelzl2, Gerd Mikus2, Jürgen Burhenne2, Anthony D Ho2, Gerlinde Egerer2. 1. Thomas Schmitt, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Anja Freiberger, Johannes Hüsing, Martina Gronkowski, Markus Thalheimer, Le Hang Pelzl, Gerd Mikus, Jürgen Burhenne, Anthony D. Ho, and Gerlinde Egerer, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; and Kai Neben, Klinikum Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Germany. thomas.schmitt@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Thomas Schmitt, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Anja Freiberger, Johannes Hüsing, Martina Gronkowski, Markus Thalheimer, Le Hang Pelzl, Gerd Mikus, Jürgen Burhenne, Anthony D. Ho, and Gerlinde Egerer, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; and Kai Neben, Klinikum Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The optimal regimen to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for patients undergoing high-dosechemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is unclear. To evaluate the effect of aprepitant in addition to a standard regimen, we conducted this randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with multiple myeloma were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive either aprepitant (125 mg orally on day 1 and 80 mg orally on days 2 to 4), granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (4 mg orally on day 1 and 2 mg orally on days 2 to 3) or matching placebo, granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (8 mg orally on day 1 and 4 mg orally on days 2 to 3). Melphalan 100 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1 to 2. ASCT was performed on day 4. The primary end point (complete response) was defined as no emesis and no rescue therapy within 120 hours of melphalan administration. Quality of life was assessed by modified Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire on days -1 and 6. RESULTS: Overall, 362 patients were available for the efficacy analysis (181 in each treatment arm). Significantly more patients receiving aprepitant reached the primary end point (58% v 41%; odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.00; P = .0042). Absence of major nausea (94% v 88%; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.09 to 5.15; P = .026) and emesis (78% v 65%; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.18; P = .0036) within 120 hours was increased by aprepitant. Mean total FLIE score (± standard deviation) was 114 ± 18 for aprepitant and 106 ± 26 for placebo (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The addition of aprepitant resulted in significantly less CINV and had a positive effect on quality of life.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The optimal regimen to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is unclear. To evaluate the effect of aprepitant in addition to a standard regimen, we conducted this randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with multiple myeloma were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive either aprepitant (125 mg orally on day 1 and 80 mg orally on days 2 to 4), granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (4 mg orally on day 1 and 2 mg orally on days 2 to 3) or matching placebo, granisetron (2 mg orally on days 1 to 4), and dexamethasone (8 mg orally on day 1 and 4 mg orally on days 2 to 3). Melphalan 100 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1 to 2. ASCT was performed on day 4. The primary end point (complete response) was defined as no emesis and no rescue therapy within 120 hours of melphalan administration. Quality of life was assessed by modified Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire on days -1 and 6. RESULTS: Overall, 362 patients were available for the efficacy analysis (181 in each treatment arm). Significantly more patients receiving aprepitant reached the primary end point (58% v 41%; odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.00; P = .0042). Absence of major nausea (94% v 88%; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.09 to 5.15; P = .026) and emesis (78% v 65%; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.18; P = .0036) within 120 hours was increased by aprepitant. Mean total FLIE score (± standard deviation) was 114 ± 18 for aprepitant and 106 ± 26 for placebo (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The addition of aprepitant resulted in significantly less CINV and had a positive effect on quality of life.
Authors: Midori Nakagaki; Michael Barras; Cameron Curley; Jason P Butler; Glen A Kennedy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lawrence H Einhorn; Bernardo Rapoport; Rudolph M Navari; Jørn Herrstedt; Mary J Brames Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Joseph M Brandwein; Jack T Seki; Eshetu G Atenafu; Amr Rostom; Andrzej Lutynski; Anna Rydlewski; Aaron D Schimmer; Andre C Schuh; Vikas Gupta; Karen W L Yee Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 3.603