| Literature DB >> 32334523 |
Xiaoxiao Wang1,2, Wei Ruan2, Shuisen Zhou3, Xinyu Feng1, He Yan1, Fang Huang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmodium vivax is the most widely distributed malaria parasite, and its drug resistance poses unique challenges to malaria elimination. The Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) is known as the global epicenter of multidrug resistance. Surveillance of molecular markers associated with drug resistance in this area will help to inform drug policy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32334523 PMCID: PMC7183581 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05032-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
General information of P. vivax infections
| General information | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| 2017 | 3 (5.17) |
| 2018 | 52 (89.66) |
| 2019 | 3 (5.17) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 40 (68.97) |
| Female | 18 (31.03) |
| Age | |
| Range | 3 ~ 69 yr |
| Median | 34.5 yr |
| History of malaria infection | |
| Yes | 9 (15.52) |
| No | 49 (84.48) |
| Activities in Myanmar | |
| Planting | 29 (50.00) |
| Visiting relatives or friends | 16 (27.59) |
| Business trip | 4 (6.90) |
| Trading | 4 (6.90) |
| Living | 4 (6.90) |
| Studying | 1 (1.72) |
Prevalence of point mutations at specific positions in Pvcrt-o, Pvmdr1, Pvdhps and Pvdhfr of P. vivax isolates
| Genes | Mutation at codon | Number (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 0 | |
| 57 | 16 (27.59) | |
| 58 | 28 (48.28) | |
| 61 | 16 (27.59) | |
| 99* | 19 (32.76) | |
| 117 | 28 (48.28) | |
| 173 | 0 | |
| 382 | 1 (1.72) | |
| 383 | 29 (50.00) | |
| 512 | 1 (1.72) | |
| 553 | 9 (15.52) | |
| 580 | 0 | |
| 585 | 0 | |
| 958 | 58 (100.00) | |
| 976 | 0 | |
| 997 | 0 | |
| 1076 | 49 (84.48) | |
| K10 insertion | 11 (18.97) | |
a: Deletion type was not included
Prevalence of haplotypes of Pvcrt-o, Pvmdr1, Pvdhps and Pvdhfr in P. vivax isolates
| Genes | Haplotype | Codona | Number (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type | I13F57S58T61H99S117I173 | 3 (5.17) | |
| Mutant type | 55 (94.83) | ||
| Mutant tandem repeat | I13F57S58T61-S117I173 | 10 (17.24) | |
| Single mutant | I13F57S58T61 | 17 (29.31) | |
| Double mutant and tandem repeat | I13F57 | 12 (20.69) | |
| Quadruple mutant(a) | I13 | 9 (15.52) | |
| Quadruple mutant(b) | I13 | 5 (8.62) | |
| Quintuple mutant | I13 | 2 (3.45) | |
| Wild type | S382A383K512A553R580V585 | 29 (50.00) | |
| Single mutant | S382 | 20 (34.48) | |
| Double mutant | S382 | 8 (13.79) | |
| Quadruple mutant | 1 (1.72) | ||
| Wild type | T958Y976K997F1076 | 0 | |
| Single mutant | 9 (15.52) | ||
| Double mutant | 49 (84.48) | ||
| Wild type | 47 (81.03) | ||
| Mutant (“AAG” insertion) | 11 (18.97) | ||
a:Mutant amino acids are shown in bold
Fig. 1Prevalence of point mutations and haplotypes of Pvcrt-O, Pvmdr1, Pvdhps and Pvdhfr in P. vivax isolates
Fig. 2Sequence alignment of tandem repeat region between amino acid positions 84 and 106 in Pvdhfr gene. Dashes represent tandem repeat deletion between 98 and 103. Blue indicates the tandem repeat. Orange denotes the mutant at codon 99