Literature DB >> 32328711

The association between the number of vaginal examinations during labor and perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study.

Ohad Gluck1, Hadas Ganer Herman2, Ori Tal2, Ehud Grinstein2, Jacob Bar2, Michal Kovo2, Shimon Ginath2, Eran Weiner2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the association between the number of vaginal examinations (VEs) performed during labor and subsequent severe perineal trauma.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. We included all women admitted to the delivery ward between 2008 and 2017, in active labor. Exclusion criteria included preterm deliveries (< 37 weeks), Cesarean deliveries and episiotomy during delivery. The primary outcome, severe perineal trauma, was defined as perineal tears grades 3-4. The cohort was divided into 4 groups, based on the number of VEs performed during labor: Group 1-up to two VEs (n = 4588), Group 2-three to four VEs (n = 5815), Group 3-five to six VEs (n = 4687), and Group 4-seven or more VEs (n = 7297).
RESULTS: Overall, 22,387 women were included in the study. The rate of severe perineal trauma in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 was 0.4%, 0.1%, 0.8%, and 0.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Performing five or more VEs during labor was associated with a higher risk of severe perineal trauma (0.26% vs. 0.53%, p < 0.01), as compared to four VEs or less. Using a logistic regression model, we found that performing five or more VEs during labor (aOR = 1.72 CI 95% (1.21-2.47), p < 0.001) or performing an instrumental delivery (aOR = 2.65 CI 95% (1.72-4.07), p < 0.001) were directly associated with the risk for severe perineal trauma. Applying epidural anesthesia showed an inverse association with severe perineal trauma (aOR = 0.54 CI 95% (0.38-0.77), p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Performing five or more VEs during active labor is associated with an increased risk for severe perineal trauma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Perineal trauma; Vaginal examination

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32328711     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05552-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  9 in total

1.  Obstetric gel shortens second stage of labor and prevents perineal trauma in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial on labor facilitation.

Authors:  Andreas F Schaub; Mario Litschgi; Irene Hoesli; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Ulrich Bleul; Verena Geissbühler
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 2.  Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.

Authors:  Vigdis Aasheim; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Liv Merete Reinar; Mirjam Lukasse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

3.  Episiotomy: the final cut?

Authors:  Naama Steiner; Adi Y Weintraub; Arnon Wiznitzer; Ruslan Sergienko; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Risk factors for intraamniotic infection: a prospective epidemiologic study.

Authors:  D E Soper; C G Mayhall; H P Dalton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Helain J Landy; S Katherine Laughon; Jennifer L Bailit; Michelle A Kominiarek; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero; Mildred Ramirez; Shoshana Haberman; Judith Hibbard; Isabelle Wilkins; D Ware Branch; Ronald T Burkman; Kimberly Gregory; Matthew K Hoffman; Lee A Learman; Christos Hatjis; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Liping Sun; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  A clinical audit of the number of vaginal examinations in labor: a NOVEL idea.

Authors:  Noelle Borders; Robyn Lawton; Shannon R Martin
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations in labour.

Authors:  Ashley Shepherd; Helen Cheyne
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 8.  Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.

Authors:  Soo Downe; Gillian M L Gyte; Hannah G Dahlen; Mandisa Singata
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-15

9.  Once episiotomy, always episiotomy?

Authors:  Ayala Zilberman; Eyal Sheiner; Orit Barrett; Batel Hamou; Tali Silberstein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.344

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).

Authors:  Nadine Schwertner-Tiepelmann; Karlotta Lorenz; Frank Schwab; Kathrin Beilecke; Juliane Marschke; Ralf Tunn
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Gillian Ml Gyte; Hannah G Dahlen; Gill Thomson; Mandisa Singata-Madliki; Andrew Clegg; Soo Downe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.