Literature DB >> 22397830

The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations in labour.

Ashley Shepherd1, Helen Cheyne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vaginal examinations (VEs) in labour are a routine part of intrapartum care. Current U.K. guidelines recommend that VEs are offered to women at regular intervals of not less than 4h and only performed when justifiably necessary. However, justification may be interpreted differently by different midwives. This study aimed to investigate (i) the number of VEs performed in relation to length of labour and (ii) the reasons given by midwives for performing the VE.
METHODS: This study recruited a group of women (n=144) admitted in either spontaneous labour or for induction of labour from one NHS hospital in Scotland. The number of VEs performed, the reason provided by the midwife for its need and the length of labour were all recorded.
FINDINGS: The number of VEs carried out (mean 2.9, SD 1.5, range 1-7) increased as length of time in labour in hospital increased. Approximately half the sample (52%) had 3 or more VEs during labour. Almost 70% of women had more VEs than expected when the criteria of 4 hourly VEs was applied. The most common reason given by midwives for performing a VE was to assess labour progress and to assess the commencement of labour.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite maternity care policy to limit interventions in normal labour, we found that a substantial number of women received more VEs than was consistent with adherence to guidelines. However, until further research is conducted to validate other measures of labour progress, the number of VEs undertaken during labour is unlikely to decrease.
Copyright © 2012 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397830     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  8 in total

Review 1.  Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Gillian Ml Gyte; Hannah G Dahlen; Gill Thomson; Mandisa Singata-Madliki; Andrew Clegg; Soo Downe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Improving vaginal examinations performed by midwives.

Authors:  Rhoda S Muliira; Vidya Seshan; Shanthi Ramasubramaniam
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2013-06-25

3.  The association between the number of vaginal examinations during labor and perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ohad Gluck; Hadas Ganer Herman; Ori Tal; Ehud Grinstein; Jacob Bar; Michal Kovo; Shimon Ginath; Eran Weiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the women's perceptions of vaginal examination during labor questionnaire.

Authors:  Samaneh Dabagh-Fekri; Leila Amiri Farahani; Fatemeh Bazarganipour; Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghady
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

5.  Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor.

Authors:  Yaw A Wiafe; Bill Whitehead; Heather Venables; Edward T Dassah; Torbjørn M Eggebø
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-07-28

6.  Potential excess of vaginal examinations during the management of labor: frequency and associated factors in 13 Peruvian hospitals.

Authors:  Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; Renee Montesinos-Segura; Pamela D Flores-Gonzales; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  The diagnostic accuracy of purple line in prediction of labor progress in omolbanin hospital, iran.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Morvarid Irani; Fatemeh Tara; Habibollah Esmaily
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  The correlation between the number of vaginal examinations during active labor and febrile morbidity, a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ohad Gluck; Yossi Mizrachi; Hadas Ganer Herman; Jacob Bar; Michal Kovo; Eran Weiner
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.